Florian Kattner, Julia Föcker, Cleopatra Christina Moshona, John E Marsh
{"title":"当较柔和的声音更容易分散注意力时:与任务无关的耳语会干扰连续回忆。","authors":"Florian Kattner, Julia Föcker, Cleopatra Christina Moshona, John E Marsh","doi":"10.1121/10.0034454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two competing accounts propose that the disruption of short-term memory by irrelevant speech arises either due to interference-by-process (e.g., changing-state effect) or attentional capture, but it is unclear how whispering affects the irrelevant speech effect. According to the interference-by-process account, whispered speech should be less disruptive due to its reduced periodic spectro-temporal fine structure and lower amplitude modulations. In contrast, the attentional account predicts more disruption by whispered speech, possibly via enhanced listening effort in the case of a comprehended language. In two experiments, voiced and whispered speech (spoken sentences or monosyllabic words) were presented while participants memorized the order of visually presented letters. In both experiments, a changing-state effect was observed regardless of the phonation (sentences produced more disruption than \"steady-state\" words). Moreover, whispered speech (lower fluctuation strength) was more disruptive than voiced speech when participants understood the language (Experiment 1), but not when the language was incomprehensible (Experiment 2). The results suggest two functionally distinct mechanisms of auditory distraction: While changing-state speech causes automatic interference with seriation processes regardless of its meaning or intelligibility, whispering appears to contain cues that divert attention from the focal task primarily when presented in a comprehended language, possibly via enhanced listening effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"156 5","pages":"3632-3648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When softer sounds are more distracting: Task-irrelevant whispered speech causes disruption of serial recall.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Kattner, Julia Föcker, Cleopatra Christina Moshona, John E Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0034454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two competing accounts propose that the disruption of short-term memory by irrelevant speech arises either due to interference-by-process (e.g., changing-state effect) or attentional capture, but it is unclear how whispering affects the irrelevant speech effect. According to the interference-by-process account, whispered speech should be less disruptive due to its reduced periodic spectro-temporal fine structure and lower amplitude modulations. In contrast, the attentional account predicts more disruption by whispered speech, possibly via enhanced listening effort in the case of a comprehended language. In two experiments, voiced and whispered speech (spoken sentences or monosyllabic words) were presented while participants memorized the order of visually presented letters. In both experiments, a changing-state effect was observed regardless of the phonation (sentences produced more disruption than \\\"steady-state\\\" words). Moreover, whispered speech (lower fluctuation strength) was more disruptive than voiced speech when participants understood the language (Experiment 1), but not when the language was incomprehensible (Experiment 2). The results suggest two functionally distinct mechanisms of auditory distraction: While changing-state speech causes automatic interference with seriation processes regardless of its meaning or intelligibility, whispering appears to contain cues that divert attention from the focal task primarily when presented in a comprehended language, possibly via enhanced listening effort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"156 5\",\"pages\":\"3632-3648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034454\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
When softer sounds are more distracting: Task-irrelevant whispered speech causes disruption of serial recall.
Two competing accounts propose that the disruption of short-term memory by irrelevant speech arises either due to interference-by-process (e.g., changing-state effect) or attentional capture, but it is unclear how whispering affects the irrelevant speech effect. According to the interference-by-process account, whispered speech should be less disruptive due to its reduced periodic spectro-temporal fine structure and lower amplitude modulations. In contrast, the attentional account predicts more disruption by whispered speech, possibly via enhanced listening effort in the case of a comprehended language. In two experiments, voiced and whispered speech (spoken sentences or monosyllabic words) were presented while participants memorized the order of visually presented letters. In both experiments, a changing-state effect was observed regardless of the phonation (sentences produced more disruption than "steady-state" words). Moreover, whispered speech (lower fluctuation strength) was more disruptive than voiced speech when participants understood the language (Experiment 1), but not when the language was incomprehensible (Experiment 2). The results suggest two functionally distinct mechanisms of auditory distraction: While changing-state speech causes automatic interference with seriation processes regardless of its meaning or intelligibility, whispering appears to contain cues that divert attention from the focal task primarily when presented in a comprehended language, possibly via enhanced listening effort.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.