在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术中使用氯尼替丁和右美托咪定控制低血压:一项比较研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Erick Namegabe Mugabo, Yvette Masime Kulimushi, Gregor Pollach, Rania Abdelazim Sabra, Ragab Saad Beltagy, Furaha Nzanzu Blaise Pascal
{"title":"在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术中使用氯尼替丁和右美托咪定控制低血压:一项比较研究。","authors":"Erick Namegabe Mugabo, Yvette Masime Kulimushi, Gregor Pollach, Rania Abdelazim Sabra, Ragab Saad Beltagy, Furaha Nzanzu Blaise Pascal","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02809-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is minimally invasive, ambulatory endoscopic surgical procedure usually performed in most paranasal sinus diseases. Controlled hypotension during anaesthesia (hypotensive anesthesia) improves surgical field visibility and reduces risk of injuring surrounding structures. Clonidine (C) and dexmedetomidine (D) are both used to reduce blood pressure and heart rate while maintaining tissue perfusion. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of clonidine compared to dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during FESS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethical approval, 80 patients undergoing elective FESS were included in the study and randomly allocated to Group C or Group D. In Group C, 40 patients received intravenous clonidine with a loading dose of 3µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8 µg/Kg/hour. In Group D patients received intravenous dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8µg/Kg/hour. The target was mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 55 and 65 mmHg and heart rate (HR) above 50 beats per minute. The primary outcome was blood loss. The secondary outcomes were surgical field quality assessed by Fromme Bezooart score, variations in MAP and HR intraoperatively, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and post-operative sedation assessed by Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data of both groups were comparable. The difference between both groups in terms of blood loss and surgical field quality was not statistically significant (p = 0.579, 1.000). MAP and HR were statistically significantly reduced to targeted level in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.001). Dexmedetomidine led to severe hypotension compared to clonidine, and the difference was statistically significant. Duration of return to baseline MAP and HR, duration of anesthesia and postoperative sedation were prolonged in group D compared to Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clonidine and dexmedetomidine provided good to excellent quality of surgical field visibility to surgeons during FESS. Dexmedetomidine produce more hypotension and bradycardia compared to clonidine which may be preferable for controlled hypotension in the setting of ambulatory surgery. However, considering the small sample of this study which could not detect small but clinically differences between both drugs, there is a need for a much larger and multicenter study to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Registry (pactr.samrc, ac.za) on 15 August 2024 under trial number PACTR202408565688611.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clonidine and dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Erick Namegabe Mugabo, Yvette Masime Kulimushi, Gregor Pollach, Rania Abdelazim Sabra, Ragab Saad Beltagy, Furaha Nzanzu Blaise Pascal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02809-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is minimally invasive, ambulatory endoscopic surgical procedure usually performed in most paranasal sinus diseases. Controlled hypotension during anaesthesia (hypotensive anesthesia) improves surgical field visibility and reduces risk of injuring surrounding structures. Clonidine (C) and dexmedetomidine (D) are both used to reduce blood pressure and heart rate while maintaining tissue perfusion. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of clonidine compared to dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during FESS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ethical approval, 80 patients undergoing elective FESS were included in the study and randomly allocated to Group C or Group D. In Group C, 40 patients received intravenous clonidine with a loading dose of 3µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8 µg/Kg/hour. In Group D patients received intravenous dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8µg/Kg/hour. The target was mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 55 and 65 mmHg and heart rate (HR) above 50 beats per minute. The primary outcome was blood loss. The secondary outcomes were surgical field quality assessed by Fromme Bezooart score, variations in MAP and HR intraoperatively, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and post-operative sedation assessed by Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data of both groups were comparable. The difference between both groups in terms of blood loss and surgical field quality was not statistically significant (p = 0.579, 1.000). MAP and HR were statistically significantly reduced to targeted level in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.001). Dexmedetomidine led to severe hypotension compared to clonidine, and the difference was statistically significant. Duration of return to baseline MAP and HR, duration of anesthesia and postoperative sedation were prolonged in group D compared to Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clonidine and dexmedetomidine provided good to excellent quality of surgical field visibility to surgeons during FESS. Dexmedetomidine produce more hypotension and bradycardia compared to clonidine which may be preferable for controlled hypotension in the setting of ambulatory surgery. However, considering the small sample of this study which could not detect small but clinically differences between both drugs, there is a need for a much larger and multicenter study to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Registry (pactr.samrc, ac.za) on 15 August 2024 under trial number PACTR202408565688611.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02809-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02809-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)是一种微创、非卧床内窥镜手术,通常用于治疗大多数副鼻窦疾病。麻醉期间控制低血压(低血压麻醉)可改善手术视野,降低损伤周围结构的风险。氯尼替丁(C)和右美托咪定(D)都可用于降低血压和心率,同时维持组织灌注。本研究旨在评估在 FESS 过程中,氯尼替丁与右美托咪定相比在控制低血压方面的疗效:C组的40名患者接受静脉注射氯尼替丁,负荷剂量为3µg/Kg,持续10分钟,维持剂量为0.4-0.8µg/Kg/小时。D 组患者接受静脉注射右美托咪定,负荷剂量为 1 微克/千克,持续 10 分钟,维持剂量为 0.4-0.8 微克/千克/小时。目标是平均动脉血压(MAP)介于 55 至 65 mmHg 之间,心率(HR)高于每分钟 50 次。主要结果是失血量。次要结果是由 Fromme Bezooart 评分评估的手术视野质量、术中 MAP 和 HR 的变化、手术和麻醉持续时间以及由 Ramsay 镇静评分(RSS)评估的术后镇静:结果:两组患者的人口统计学数据具有可比性。两组在失血量和手术视野质量方面的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.579,1.000)。与基线相比,两组患者的血压和心率均明显降低至目标水平,差异无统计学意义(P=0.579,1.000):氯尼替丁(Clonidine)和右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine)为外科医生提供了良好至卓越的 FESS 手术视野。右美托咪定产生的低血压和心动过缓比氯雷定更多,在非卧床手术中,右美托咪定可能更适合用于控制低血压。然而,考虑到这项研究的样本较少,无法检测出两种药物之间微小但临床上的差异,因此有必要进行更大规模的多中心研究来证实这些发现:本试验于 2024 年 8 月 15 日在泛非临床注册中心(pactr.samrc, ac.za)进行了回顾性注册,试验编号为 PACTR202408565688611。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clonidine and dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a comparative study.

Background: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is minimally invasive, ambulatory endoscopic surgical procedure usually performed in most paranasal sinus diseases. Controlled hypotension during anaesthesia (hypotensive anesthesia) improves surgical field visibility and reduces risk of injuring surrounding structures. Clonidine (C) and dexmedetomidine (D) are both used to reduce blood pressure and heart rate while maintaining tissue perfusion. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of clonidine compared to dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during FESS.

Methods: After ethical approval, 80 patients undergoing elective FESS were included in the study and randomly allocated to Group C or Group D. In Group C, 40 patients received intravenous clonidine with a loading dose of 3µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8 µg/Kg/hour. In Group D patients received intravenous dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8µg/Kg/hour. The target was mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 55 and 65 mmHg and heart rate (HR) above 50 beats per minute. The primary outcome was blood loss. The secondary outcomes were surgical field quality assessed by Fromme Bezooart score, variations in MAP and HR intraoperatively, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and post-operative sedation assessed by Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS).

Results: Demographic data of both groups were comparable. The difference between both groups in terms of blood loss and surgical field quality was not statistically significant (p = 0.579, 1.000). MAP and HR were statistically significantly reduced to targeted level in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.001). Dexmedetomidine led to severe hypotension compared to clonidine, and the difference was statistically significant. Duration of return to baseline MAP and HR, duration of anesthesia and postoperative sedation were prolonged in group D compared to Group C.

Conclusion: Clonidine and dexmedetomidine provided good to excellent quality of surgical field visibility to surgeons during FESS. Dexmedetomidine produce more hypotension and bradycardia compared to clonidine which may be preferable for controlled hypotension in the setting of ambulatory surgery. However, considering the small sample of this study which could not detect small but clinically differences between both drugs, there is a need for a much larger and multicenter study to confirm these findings.

Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Registry (pactr.samrc, ac.za) on 15 August 2024 under trial number PACTR202408565688611.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信