美国医生的工作控制与职业倦怠和职业意向的关系:一项多机构研究。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christine A Sinsky, Roger L Brown, Lisa Rotenstein, Lindsey E Carlasare, Purva Shah, Tait D Shanafelt
{"title":"美国医生的工作控制与职业倦怠和职业意向的关系:一项多机构研究。","authors":"Christine A Sinsky, Roger L Brown, Lisa Rotenstein, Lindsey E Carlasare, Purva Shah, Tait D Shanafelt","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician control over their clinical work is hypothesized to be associated with both burnout and career intentions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of perceived work control with burnout and career intentions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-institution study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A sample of U.S. physicians between November 2022 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A novel multicomponent measure of work control, Mini-Z single-item burnout measure, intent to reduce clinical hours (ITR), and intent to leave the current practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 61.4% (1318 of 2144) reported adequate control over patient load, 60.6% (1301 of 2144) adequate control over membership of their clinical team, and 61.3% (1434 of 2339) adequate control over workload. Adequate control over hiring of staff and clinical schedule were reported by 49.0% (772 of 1574) and 74.6% (1175 of 1574), respectively. Most respondents (58.3% [692 of 1186]) reported that they had sufficient authority/autonomy over that for which they are accountable. On multivariable analyses adjusting for personal and professional characteristics, poor control over patient load, team composition, clinical schedule, domains for which the physician is accountable, and workload were independently associated with burnout. Poor control over patient load and workload were each independently associated with ITR.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study, so causation cannot be determined, and it is a convenience sample of practices with more than 100 physicians, so it may not be representative of all U.S. physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, cross-sectional study, poor control over specific aspects of work was associated with burnout and intentions to reduce clinical effort or leave one's organization. Efforts to reduce burnout and improve retention should consider how to provide physician control over appropriate aspects of their clinical work environment.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>American Medical Association.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Work Control With Burnout and Career Intentions Among U.S. Physicians : A Multi-Institution Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christine A Sinsky, Roger L Brown, Lisa Rotenstein, Lindsey E Carlasare, Purva Shah, Tait D Shanafelt\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician control over their clinical work is hypothesized to be associated with both burnout and career intentions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of perceived work control with burnout and career intentions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-institution study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A sample of U.S. physicians between November 2022 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A novel multicomponent measure of work control, Mini-Z single-item burnout measure, intent to reduce clinical hours (ITR), and intent to leave the current practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 61.4% (1318 of 2144) reported adequate control over patient load, 60.6% (1301 of 2144) adequate control over membership of their clinical team, and 61.3% (1434 of 2339) adequate control over workload. Adequate control over hiring of staff and clinical schedule were reported by 49.0% (772 of 1574) and 74.6% (1175 of 1574), respectively. Most respondents (58.3% [692 of 1186]) reported that they had sufficient authority/autonomy over that for which they are accountable. On multivariable analyses adjusting for personal and professional characteristics, poor control over patient load, team composition, clinical schedule, domains for which the physician is accountable, and workload were independently associated with burnout. Poor control over patient load and workload were each independently associated with ITR.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study, so causation cannot be determined, and it is a convenience sample of practices with more than 100 physicians, so it may not be representative of all U.S. physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, cross-sectional study, poor control over specific aspects of work was associated with burnout and intentions to reduce clinical effort or leave one's organization. Efforts to reduce burnout and improve retention should consider how to provide physician control over appropriate aspects of their clinical work environment.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>American Medical Association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00884\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00884","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医生对其临床工作的控制被认为与职业倦怠和职业意向有关:假设医生对临床工作的控制与职业倦怠和职业意向有关:评估感知到的工作控制与职业倦怠和职业意向的关系:设计:一项多机构研究:横断面调查:2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 12 月期间的美国医生样本:新颖的工作控制多成分测量法、Mini-Z 单项职业倦怠测量法、减少临床工作时间(ITR)的意愿以及离开当前执业地点的意愿:在受访者中,61.4%(2144 位受访者中的 1318 位)表示对患者工作量有充分控制,60.6%(2144 位受访者中的 1301 位)表示对临床团队成员有充分控制,61.3%(2339 位受访者中的 1434 位)表示对工作量有充分控制。49.0%的受访者(1574 位受访者中的 772 位)和 74.6%的受访者(1574 位受访者中的 1175 位)表示对员工聘用和临床日程安排有充分的控制权。大多数受访者(58.3% [1186人中的692人])表示,他们对自己负责的工作有足够的权力/自主权。在对个人和职业特征进行调整的多变量分析中,对患者负荷、团队组成、临床日程安排、医生负责的领域和工作量控制不力与倦怠感有独立关联。对患者负荷和工作量的控制不佳分别与ITR独立相关:局限性:这是一项横断面研究,因此无法确定因果关系,而且这是对拥有 100 多名医生的诊所进行的方便抽样调查,因此可能无法代表所有美国医生:在这项大型横断面研究中,对工作特定方面控制不力与职业倦怠和减少临床工作或离开所在机构的意愿有关。减少职业倦怠和提高留任率的工作应考虑如何让医生控制临床工作环境的适当方面:主要资金来源:美国医学协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Work Control With Burnout and Career Intentions Among U.S. Physicians : A Multi-Institution Study.

Background: Physician control over their clinical work is hypothesized to be associated with both burnout and career intentions.

Objective: To assess the association of perceived work control with burnout and career intentions.

Design: A multi-institution study.

Setting: Cross-sectional survey.

Participants: A sample of U.S. physicians between November 2022 and December 2023.

Measurements: A novel multicomponent measure of work control, Mini-Z single-item burnout measure, intent to reduce clinical hours (ITR), and intent to leave the current practice.

Results: Among respondents, 61.4% (1318 of 2144) reported adequate control over patient load, 60.6% (1301 of 2144) adequate control over membership of their clinical team, and 61.3% (1434 of 2339) adequate control over workload. Adequate control over hiring of staff and clinical schedule were reported by 49.0% (772 of 1574) and 74.6% (1175 of 1574), respectively. Most respondents (58.3% [692 of 1186]) reported that they had sufficient authority/autonomy over that for which they are accountable. On multivariable analyses adjusting for personal and professional characteristics, poor control over patient load, team composition, clinical schedule, domains for which the physician is accountable, and workload were independently associated with burnout. Poor control over patient load and workload were each independently associated with ITR.

Limitation: This is a cross-sectional study, so causation cannot be determined, and it is a convenience sample of practices with more than 100 physicians, so it may not be representative of all U.S. physicians.

Conclusion: In this large, cross-sectional study, poor control over specific aspects of work was associated with burnout and intentions to reduce clinical effort or leave one's organization. Efforts to reduce burnout and improve retention should consider how to provide physician control over appropriate aspects of their clinical work environment.

Primary funding source: American Medical Association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信