移动非接触式指纹演示攻击检测:通用性和可解释性

Jannis Priesnitz;Roberto Casula;Jascha Kolberg;Meiling Fang;Akhila Madhu;Christian Rathgeb;Gian Luca Marcialis;Naser Damer;Christoph Busch
{"title":"移动非接触式指纹演示攻击检测:通用性和可解释性","authors":"Jannis Priesnitz;Roberto Casula;Jascha Kolberg;Meiling Fang;Akhila Madhu;Christian Rathgeb;Gian Luca Marcialis;Naser Damer;Christoph Busch","doi":"10.1109/TBIOM.2024.3403770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contactless fingerprint recognition is an emerging biometric technology that has several advantages over contact-based schemes, such as improved user acceptance and fewer hygienic concerns. Like for most other biometrics, Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) is crucial to preserving the trustworthiness of contactless fingerprint recognition methods. For many contactless biometric characteristics, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) represent the state-of-the-art of PAD algorithms. For CNNs, the ability to accurately classify samples that are not included in the training is of particular interest, since these generalization capabilities indicate robustness in real-world scenarios. In this work, we focus on the generalizability and explainability aspects of CNN-based contactless fingerprint PAD methods. Based on previously obtained findings, we selected four CNN-based methods for contactless fingerprint PAD: two PAD methods designed for other biometric characteristics, an algorithm for contact-based fingerprint PAD and a general-purpose ResNet18. For our evaluation, we use four databases and partition them using Leave-One-Out (LOO) protocols. Furthermore, the generalization capability to a newly captured database is tested. Moreover, we explore t-SNE plots as a means of explainability to interpret our results in more detail. The low D-EERs obtained from the LOO experiments (below 0.1% D-EER for every LOO group) indicate that the selected algorithms are well-suited for the particular application. However, with an D-EER of 4.14%, the generalization experiment still has room for improvement.","PeriodicalId":73307,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","volume":"6 4","pages":"561-574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10536028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection: Generalizability and Explainability\",\"authors\":\"Jannis Priesnitz;Roberto Casula;Jascha Kolberg;Meiling Fang;Akhila Madhu;Christian Rathgeb;Gian Luca Marcialis;Naser Damer;Christoph Busch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBIOM.2024.3403770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contactless fingerprint recognition is an emerging biometric technology that has several advantages over contact-based schemes, such as improved user acceptance and fewer hygienic concerns. Like for most other biometrics, Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) is crucial to preserving the trustworthiness of contactless fingerprint recognition methods. For many contactless biometric characteristics, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) represent the state-of-the-art of PAD algorithms. For CNNs, the ability to accurately classify samples that are not included in the training is of particular interest, since these generalization capabilities indicate robustness in real-world scenarios. In this work, we focus on the generalizability and explainability aspects of CNN-based contactless fingerprint PAD methods. Based on previously obtained findings, we selected four CNN-based methods for contactless fingerprint PAD: two PAD methods designed for other biometric characteristics, an algorithm for contact-based fingerprint PAD and a general-purpose ResNet18. For our evaluation, we use four databases and partition them using Leave-One-Out (LOO) protocols. Furthermore, the generalization capability to a newly captured database is tested. Moreover, we explore t-SNE plots as a means of explainability to interpret our results in more detail. The low D-EERs obtained from the LOO experiments (below 0.1% D-EER for every LOO group) indicate that the selected algorithms are well-suited for the particular application. However, with an D-EER of 4.14%, the generalization experiment still has room for improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"561-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10536028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10536028/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10536028/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非接触式指纹识别是一种新兴的生物识别技术,与基于接触的方案相比,它具有一些优势,例如用户接受度更高,卫生问题更少。与大多数其他生物识别技术一样,呈现攻击检测(PAD)对于保持非接触式指纹识别方法的可信度至关重要。就许多非接触式生物识别特征而言,卷积神经网络(CNN)代表了 PAD 算法的最先进水平。对于卷积神经网络来说,对训练中未包含的样本进行准确分类的能力尤其令人感兴趣,因为这些泛化能力表明了其在现实世界中的鲁棒性。在这项工作中,我们重点研究了基于 CNN 的非接触式指纹 PAD 方法的泛化能力和可解释性。根据之前的研究结果,我们选择了四种基于 CNN 的非接触式指纹 PAD 方法:两种针对其他生物特征设计的 PAD 方法、一种基于接触式指纹 PAD 的算法和一种通用 ResNet18。在评估中,我们使用了四个数据库,并使用 "留一"(LOO)协议对其进行了分割。此外,我们还测试了新获取数据库的泛化能力。此外,我们还探索了 t-SNE 图作为可解释性的一种手段,以更详细地解释我们的结果。从 LOO 实验中获得的低 D-EER(每个 LOO 组的 D-EER 均低于 0.1%)表明,所选算法非常适合特定应用。然而,泛化实验的 D-EER 为 4.14%,仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection: Generalizability and Explainability
Contactless fingerprint recognition is an emerging biometric technology that has several advantages over contact-based schemes, such as improved user acceptance and fewer hygienic concerns. Like for most other biometrics, Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) is crucial to preserving the trustworthiness of contactless fingerprint recognition methods. For many contactless biometric characteristics, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) represent the state-of-the-art of PAD algorithms. For CNNs, the ability to accurately classify samples that are not included in the training is of particular interest, since these generalization capabilities indicate robustness in real-world scenarios. In this work, we focus on the generalizability and explainability aspects of CNN-based contactless fingerprint PAD methods. Based on previously obtained findings, we selected four CNN-based methods for contactless fingerprint PAD: two PAD methods designed for other biometric characteristics, an algorithm for contact-based fingerprint PAD and a general-purpose ResNet18. For our evaluation, we use four databases and partition them using Leave-One-Out (LOO) protocols. Furthermore, the generalization capability to a newly captured database is tested. Moreover, we explore t-SNE plots as a means of explainability to interpret our results in more detail. The low D-EERs obtained from the LOO experiments (below 0.1% D-EER for every LOO group) indicate that the selected algorithms are well-suited for the particular application. However, with an D-EER of 4.14%, the generalization experiment still has room for improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信