{"title":"Covid-19 对孕期和围产期妇女心理健康和福祉的影响:混合方法系统综述》。","authors":"Kanamon Pankaew, Diane Carpenter, Nalinee Kerdprasong, Juntina Nawamawat, Nisa Krutchan, Samantha Brown, Jill Shawe, Jane March-McDonald","doi":"10.1177/00469580241301521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Review question: </strong>What is the impact of Covid-19 upon the mental health and well-being of women during pregnancy and during the perinatal period?</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>empirical primary research; maternal mental health and wellbeing; perinatal period; Covid-19; English or Thai language; studies from December 2019-September 2021, updated March 2024.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>secondary research, commentary, grey literature. Databases searched: CINAHL, Cochrane, JBI, Medline, PsycINFO, Clinical Key and Web of Science. Studies were assessed for bias using tools aligned with study design. A convergent integrated approach was taken whereby quantitative data was combined with qualitative data, synthesised simultaneously using Braun and Clarke Six Steps to Thematical Analysis and presented as narrative. Forty-two studies were included. Overall level of methodological quality of studies was 14 rated good, 28 fair. Overarching themes: \"Impact\" and \"Emotional Impact.\" Themes: demographic impact; mental health and socio-economic factors; obstetric factors; pre-morbidity; maternity service delivery; relationships; fear and worry, grief and loss. Commonality suggested some evidence for increased risk and prevalence for perinatal mental illness to pre-pandemic levels.</p><p><strong>Risk factors: </strong>lack/perceived lack of social support; high-risk pregnancy, complex obstetric history; prior mental illness; maternity service delivery, quality and safety; fear and worry. Results confer perinatal mental illness prominent during the pandemic though many did not suggest prevalence higher than pre-pandemic levels, or directly associated. Several factors compound risk. A small number of protective factors are identified. The dynamic processes of risk and protection need to be understood within the specific context in which they operate. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was not registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"61 ","pages":"469580241301521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Covid-19 on Women's Mental Health and Wellbeing During Pregnancy and the Perinatal Period: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kanamon Pankaew, Diane Carpenter, Nalinee Kerdprasong, Juntina Nawamawat, Nisa Krutchan, Samantha Brown, Jill Shawe, Jane March-McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580241301521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Review question: </strong>What is the impact of Covid-19 upon the mental health and well-being of women during pregnancy and during the perinatal period?</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>empirical primary research; maternal mental health and wellbeing; perinatal period; Covid-19; English or Thai language; studies from December 2019-September 2021, updated March 2024.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>secondary research, commentary, grey literature. Databases searched: CINAHL, Cochrane, JBI, Medline, PsycINFO, Clinical Key and Web of Science. Studies were assessed for bias using tools aligned with study design. A convergent integrated approach was taken whereby quantitative data was combined with qualitative data, synthesised simultaneously using Braun and Clarke Six Steps to Thematical Analysis and presented as narrative. Forty-two studies were included. Overall level of methodological quality of studies was 14 rated good, 28 fair. Overarching themes: \\\"Impact\\\" and \\\"Emotional Impact.\\\" Themes: demographic impact; mental health and socio-economic factors; obstetric factors; pre-morbidity; maternity service delivery; relationships; fear and worry, grief and loss. Commonality suggested some evidence for increased risk and prevalence for perinatal mental illness to pre-pandemic levels.</p><p><strong>Risk factors: </strong>lack/perceived lack of social support; high-risk pregnancy, complex obstetric history; prior mental illness; maternity service delivery, quality and safety; fear and worry. Results confer perinatal mental illness prominent during the pandemic though many did not suggest prevalence higher than pre-pandemic levels, or directly associated. Several factors compound risk. A small number of protective factors are identified. The dynamic processes of risk and protection need to be understood within the specific context in which they operate. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was not registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"469580241301521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241301521\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241301521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
审查问题:Covid-19对孕期和围产期妇女的心理健康和福祉有何影响?纳入标准:实证性初步研究;产妇心理健康和福祉;围产期;Covid-19;英语或泰语;2019年12月至2021年9月的研究,2024年3月更新。排除标准:二次研究、评论、灰色文献。检索的数据库:检索数据库:CINAHL、Cochrane、JBI、Medline、PsycINFO、Clinical Key 和 Web of Science。使用与研究设计相一致的工具对研究进行偏倚评估。采用聚合综合方法,将定量数据与定性数据相结合,同时使用布劳恩和克拉克的 "主题分析六步骤 "进行综合,并以叙述的形式呈现。共纳入 42 项研究。研究方法的总体质量水平为 14 项良好,28 项一般。总体主题:"影响 "和 "情感影响"。主题:人口统计学影响;心理健康和社会经济因素;产科因素;发病前;孕产服务提供;人际关系;恐惧和担忧、悲伤和失落。风险因素:缺乏/认为缺乏社会支持;高危妊娠、复杂的产科病史;既往精神疾病;孕产服务的提供、质量和安全;恐惧和担忧。研究结果表明,围产期精神疾病在大流行期间十分突出,但许多研究结果并未表明其流行率高于大流行前的水平,或与大流行直接相关。一些因素加剧了风险。同时也发现了少数保护因素。风险和保护的动态过程需要在其运作的具体环境中加以理解。作者在本文的研究、撰写和/或发表过程中未获得任何资金支持。本研究未经注册。
The Impact of Covid-19 on Women's Mental Health and Wellbeing During Pregnancy and the Perinatal Period: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.
Review question: What is the impact of Covid-19 upon the mental health and well-being of women during pregnancy and during the perinatal period?
Inclusion criteria: empirical primary research; maternal mental health and wellbeing; perinatal period; Covid-19; English or Thai language; studies from December 2019-September 2021, updated March 2024.
Exclusion criteria: secondary research, commentary, grey literature. Databases searched: CINAHL, Cochrane, JBI, Medline, PsycINFO, Clinical Key and Web of Science. Studies were assessed for bias using tools aligned with study design. A convergent integrated approach was taken whereby quantitative data was combined with qualitative data, synthesised simultaneously using Braun and Clarke Six Steps to Thematical Analysis and presented as narrative. Forty-two studies were included. Overall level of methodological quality of studies was 14 rated good, 28 fair. Overarching themes: "Impact" and "Emotional Impact." Themes: demographic impact; mental health and socio-economic factors; obstetric factors; pre-morbidity; maternity service delivery; relationships; fear and worry, grief and loss. Commonality suggested some evidence for increased risk and prevalence for perinatal mental illness to pre-pandemic levels.
Risk factors: lack/perceived lack of social support; high-risk pregnancy, complex obstetric history; prior mental illness; maternity service delivery, quality and safety; fear and worry. Results confer perinatal mental illness prominent during the pandemic though many did not suggest prevalence higher than pre-pandemic levels, or directly associated. Several factors compound risk. A small number of protective factors are identified. The dynamic processes of risk and protection need to be understood within the specific context in which they operate. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was not registered.
期刊介绍:
INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.