新诊断心力衰竭患者的社会经济劣势与早期和反复入院风险之间的关系

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Radha Dhingra, Hanzhang Xu, Bradley G Hammill, Scott M Lynch, Jessica S West, Michael D Green, Eric D Peterson, Lesley H Curtis, Matthew E Dupre
{"title":"新诊断心力衰竭患者的社会经济劣势与早期和反复入院风险之间的关系","authors":"Radha Dhingra, Hanzhang Xu, Bradley G Hammill, Scott M Lynch, Jessica S West, Michael D Green, Eric D Peterson, Lesley H Curtis, Matthew E Dupre","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with greater risks of hospital readmission and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is less clear whether socioeconomic disadvantage has an immediate and lasting impact on the risk of admissions after the diagnosis of HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic health record data of patients aged 65 years and older with newly diagnosed HF between January 2015 and July 2018 in the Duke University Health System, with up to 8 years of follow-up. We assessed the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage, measured by the area deprivation index (lower, moderate, or higher) and hospital admissions within 30, 90, and 180 days after HF diagnosis using multivariable logistic regression models. We also assessed the risk of recurrent admissions over follow-up using Prentice, Williams, and Peterson models with total time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 5889 patients (mean [SD] age, 75 (6) years; 51% women; 67% non-Hispanic White), 71% of patients had at least one admission, and ≈50% of patients died over a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Unadjusted models showed that patients residing in higher disadvantaged neighborhoods had incrementally increasing risks for admissions within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 0.99-1.38]), 90 days (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.35]), and 180 days (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.08-1.40]) after diagnosis compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas. These risks were no longer significant after adjusting for patients' clinical and nonclinical characteristics at 30 days (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.90-1.31]), 90 days (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.92-1.25]), and 180 days (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96-1.27]). However, patients living in higher disadvantaged areas had significantly greater risks of recurrent admissions over follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]; <i>P</i><0.001) compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with HF residing in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage are at higher risk for recurrent admissions and thus should be considered for targeted intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011141"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Risks of Early and Recurrent Admissions Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Radha Dhingra, Hanzhang Xu, Bradley G Hammill, Scott M Lynch, Jessica S West, Michael D Green, Eric D Peterson, Lesley H Curtis, Matthew E Dupre\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with greater risks of hospital readmission and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is less clear whether socioeconomic disadvantage has an immediate and lasting impact on the risk of admissions after the diagnosis of HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic health record data of patients aged 65 years and older with newly diagnosed HF between January 2015 and July 2018 in the Duke University Health System, with up to 8 years of follow-up. We assessed the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage, measured by the area deprivation index (lower, moderate, or higher) and hospital admissions within 30, 90, and 180 days after HF diagnosis using multivariable logistic regression models. We also assessed the risk of recurrent admissions over follow-up using Prentice, Williams, and Peterson models with total time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 5889 patients (mean [SD] age, 75 (6) years; 51% women; 67% non-Hispanic White), 71% of patients had at least one admission, and ≈50% of patients died over a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Unadjusted models showed that patients residing in higher disadvantaged neighborhoods had incrementally increasing risks for admissions within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 0.99-1.38]), 90 days (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.35]), and 180 days (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.08-1.40]) after diagnosis compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas. These risks were no longer significant after adjusting for patients' clinical and nonclinical characteristics at 30 days (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.90-1.31]), 90 days (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.92-1.25]), and 180 days (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96-1.27]). However, patients living in higher disadvantaged areas had significantly greater risks of recurrent admissions over follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]; <i>P</i><0.001) compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with HF residing in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage are at higher risk for recurrent admissions and thus should be considered for targeted intervention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社会经济状况不佳与心力衰竭(HF)患者再次入院的风险和死亡率增加有关。然而,社会经济劣势是否会对心力衰竭确诊后的入院风险产生直接和持久的影响,目前还不太清楚:我们使用了杜克大学卫生系统 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月间新诊断为高血压的 65 岁及以上患者的电子健康记录数据,并进行了长达 8 年的随访。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了以地区贫困指数(较低、中等或较高)衡量的邻里水平劣势与确诊心房颤动后 30 天、90 天和 180 天内入院治疗之间的关联。我们还使用 Prentice、Williams 和 Peterson 模型评估了随访期间再次入院的风险:我们的队列中有 5889 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 75 (6) 岁;51% 为女性;67% 为非西班牙裔白人),71% 的患者至少入院一次,在中位随访 5.6 年期间,≈50% 的患者死亡。未经调整的模型显示,与贫困程度较低地区的患者相比,居住在贫困程度较高地区的患者在确诊后30天(几率比[OR],1.17 [95% CI,0.99-1.38])、90天(OR,1.18 [95% CI,1.03-1.35])和180天(OR,1.23 [95% CI,1.08-1.40])内入院的风险呈递增趋势。在对患者的临床和非临床特征进行调整后,这些风险在 30 天(OR,1.09 [95% CI,0.90-1.31])、90 天(OR,1.07 [95% CI,0.92-1.25])和 180 天(OR,1.10 [95% CI,0.96-1.27])时不再显著。然而,生活在较贫困地区的患者在随访期间再次入院的风险明显更高(危险比为1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16];PC结论:我们的研究结果表明,居住在社会经济条件较差地区的高血压患者再次入院的风险较高,因此应考虑采取有针对性的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Risks of Early and Recurrent Admissions Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure.

Background: Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with greater risks of hospital readmission and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is less clear whether socioeconomic disadvantage has an immediate and lasting impact on the risk of admissions after the diagnosis of HF.

Methods: We used electronic health record data of patients aged 65 years and older with newly diagnosed HF between January 2015 and July 2018 in the Duke University Health System, with up to 8 years of follow-up. We assessed the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage, measured by the area deprivation index (lower, moderate, or higher) and hospital admissions within 30, 90, and 180 days after HF diagnosis using multivariable logistic regression models. We also assessed the risk of recurrent admissions over follow-up using Prentice, Williams, and Peterson models with total time.

Results: In our cohort of 5889 patients (mean [SD] age, 75 (6) years; 51% women; 67% non-Hispanic White), 71% of patients had at least one admission, and ≈50% of patients died over a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Unadjusted models showed that patients residing in higher disadvantaged neighborhoods had incrementally increasing risks for admissions within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 0.99-1.38]), 90 days (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.35]), and 180 days (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.08-1.40]) after diagnosis compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas. These risks were no longer significant after adjusting for patients' clinical and nonclinical characteristics at 30 days (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.90-1.31]), 90 days (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.92-1.25]), and 180 days (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96-1.27]). However, patients living in higher disadvantaged areas had significantly greater risks of recurrent admissions over follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]; P<0.001) compared with patients in lower disadvantaged areas.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with HF residing in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage are at higher risk for recurrent admissions and thus should be considered for targeted intervention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信