诊所层面的方法可提高基层医疗机构对第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Annemarie M Swamy, Noah Kaufman, Ernest Lievers, Carrie Tyler, Olivia Veira, Sofia Osio Smith, Marquita C Genies, Melina Turtle, Pamela A Matson, Julia M Kim, Arik V Marcell
{"title":"诊所层面的方法可提高基层医疗机构对第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率。","authors":"Annemarie M Swamy, Noah Kaufman, Ernest Lievers, Carrie Tyler, Olivia Veira, Sofia Osio Smith, Marquita C Genies, Melina Turtle, Pamela A Matson, Julia M Kim, Arik V Marcell","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2024.a943983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This quality improvement initiative aimed to increase first dose of COVID-19 vaccinations during pediatric/adolescent clinic visits. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were performed with creation of eligibility lists and increasing health educator (HE) engagement. Statistical process control analysis assessed vaccine receipt over time. Logistic regression modeling evaluated odds of receipt. Among 6,740 visits, 52.2% of patients were eligible for first COVID-19 vaccine; 17.9% of eligible patients accepted it. First-vaccine improvements from 13.1% to 21.7% were not sustained. Odds of receipt increased in each cycle compared with baseline (1: Odds Ratio=1.99 [95% Confidence Interval 1.49-2.67], 2: OR=2.22 [1.58-3.14]), 3: OR=2.15 [1.51-3.05]), 4: OR=1.48 [1.11-1.96]), and with HE discussion versus no HE discussion (OR=1.64 [1.16-1.90]). First COVID-19 vaccine receipt increased with vaccine-eligible patient lists and HE-initiated discussions, although improvements diminished over time. Health educator versus no HE discussion led to improved vaccinations, supporting further quality improvement research on HE role to improve vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"35 4","pages":"1158-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clinic-Level Approach to Improve Uptake of First COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Annemarie M Swamy, Noah Kaufman, Ernest Lievers, Carrie Tyler, Olivia Veira, Sofia Osio Smith, Marquita C Genies, Melina Turtle, Pamela A Matson, Julia M Kim, Arik V Marcell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hpu.2024.a943983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This quality improvement initiative aimed to increase first dose of COVID-19 vaccinations during pediatric/adolescent clinic visits. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were performed with creation of eligibility lists and increasing health educator (HE) engagement. Statistical process control analysis assessed vaccine receipt over time. Logistic regression modeling evaluated odds of receipt. Among 6,740 visits, 52.2% of patients were eligible for first COVID-19 vaccine; 17.9% of eligible patients accepted it. First-vaccine improvements from 13.1% to 21.7% were not sustained. Odds of receipt increased in each cycle compared with baseline (1: Odds Ratio=1.99 [95% Confidence Interval 1.49-2.67], 2: OR=2.22 [1.58-3.14]), 3: OR=2.15 [1.51-3.05]), 4: OR=1.48 [1.11-1.96]), and with HE discussion versus no HE discussion (OR=1.64 [1.16-1.90]). First COVID-19 vaccine receipt increased with vaccine-eligible patient lists and HE-initiated discussions, although improvements diminished over time. Health educator versus no HE discussion led to improved vaccinations, supporting further quality improvement research on HE role to improve vaccine uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"1158-1173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a943983\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a943983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项质量改进计划旨在提高儿科/青少年门诊中 COVID-19 疫苗的首剂接种率。通过创建合格名单和提高健康教育者(HE)的参与度,实施了四个 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "周期。统计过程控制分析评估了疫苗接种随时间变化的情况。逻辑回归模型评估了接种几率。在 6740 次就诊中,52.2% 的患者符合首次接种 COVID-19 疫苗的条件;17.9% 的符合条件的患者接受了接种。首次接种率从13.1%提高到21.7%,但并未持续。与基线相比,每个周期的接种几率都有所上升(1:几率比=1.99 [95% 置信区间 1.49-2.67];2:OR=2.22 [1.58-3.14];3:OR=2.15 [1.51-3.05];4:OR=1.48 [1.11-1.96]),有 HE 讨论与无 HE 讨论相比(OR=1.64 [1.16-1.90])。首次接种COVID-19疫苗的人数随着符合接种条件的患者名单和健康教育者发起的讨论而增加,但随着时间的推移,人数增加的幅度有所减小。健康教育者与无健康教育者进行讨论相比,疫苗接种率有所提高,这为进一步开展有关健康教育者在提高疫苗接种率方面的作用的质量改进研究提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Clinic-Level Approach to Improve Uptake of First COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Primary Care.

This quality improvement initiative aimed to increase first dose of COVID-19 vaccinations during pediatric/adolescent clinic visits. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were performed with creation of eligibility lists and increasing health educator (HE) engagement. Statistical process control analysis assessed vaccine receipt over time. Logistic regression modeling evaluated odds of receipt. Among 6,740 visits, 52.2% of patients were eligible for first COVID-19 vaccine; 17.9% of eligible patients accepted it. First-vaccine improvements from 13.1% to 21.7% were not sustained. Odds of receipt increased in each cycle compared with baseline (1: Odds Ratio=1.99 [95% Confidence Interval 1.49-2.67], 2: OR=2.22 [1.58-3.14]), 3: OR=2.15 [1.51-3.05]), 4: OR=1.48 [1.11-1.96]), and with HE discussion versus no HE discussion (OR=1.64 [1.16-1.90]). First COVID-19 vaccine receipt increased with vaccine-eligible patient lists and HE-initiated discussions, although improvements diminished over time. Health educator versus no HE discussion led to improved vaccinations, supporting further quality improvement research on HE role to improve vaccine uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信