经桡动脉方法对问题动静脉瘘进行血管内介入治疗:单中心病例系列和系统回顾。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1177/11297298241299904
Asanka Rohan Wijetunga, Yunyi Wang, Conan Wai Hang Chan, James Elhindi, James Colbourne
{"title":"经桡动脉方法对问题动静脉瘘进行血管内介入治疗:单中心病例系列和系统回顾。","authors":"Asanka Rohan Wijetunga, Yunyi Wang, Conan Wai Hang Chan, James Elhindi, James Colbourne","doi":"10.1177/11297298241299904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard access modality for haemodialysis, but due to patient and technical factors, it is prone to stenosis and thrombosis. The trans-radial approach offers multiple unique benefits, but its safety, efficiency and efficacy have not been rigorously studied in the context of the AVF. This study provides a case series of trans-radial AVF procedures, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature to solidify the role of the trans-radial approach in endovascular AVF surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical records were interrogated to identify all trans-radial AVF interventions between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoints were procedure time and complication rates. The secondary endpoints were primary assisted patency and increase in pre- and post-operative brachial artery blood flow. The systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from 2000 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case series identified 76 consecutive procedures performed on 49 patients. Mean procedure time was 64 min, and only one complication, a puncture site haematoma, was identified. Mean postoperative AVF flow increase was 342 mL/min (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Primary-assisted patency at 6 and 12 months was 91% and 82% respectively. The systematic review included 16 studies totalling 1163 procedures with a mean MINORS score of 69%. Mean procedure time was 44 min. Complications were rare: procedural failure (1.2%), haematoma (0.90%), radial artery occlusion (0.74%) and pseudoaneurysm (0.12%). Post-procedural flow increased by an average of 274 mL/min. Pooled primary-assisted patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 88% and 77% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trans-radial approach allows for expedient, safe and durable AVF endovascular surgery, however this technique would benefit from prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1681-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trans-radial approach for endovascular intervention of the problem arterio-venous fistula: A single-centre case series and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Asanka Rohan Wijetunga, Yunyi Wang, Conan Wai Hang Chan, James Elhindi, James Colbourne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241299904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard access modality for haemodialysis, but due to patient and technical factors, it is prone to stenosis and thrombosis. The trans-radial approach offers multiple unique benefits, but its safety, efficiency and efficacy have not been rigorously studied in the context of the AVF. This study provides a case series of trans-radial AVF procedures, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature to solidify the role of the trans-radial approach in endovascular AVF surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical records were interrogated to identify all trans-radial AVF interventions between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoints were procedure time and complication rates. The secondary endpoints were primary assisted patency and increase in pre- and post-operative brachial artery blood flow. The systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from 2000 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case series identified 76 consecutive procedures performed on 49 patients. Mean procedure time was 64 min, and only one complication, a puncture site haematoma, was identified. Mean postoperative AVF flow increase was 342 mL/min (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Primary-assisted patency at 6 and 12 months was 91% and 82% respectively. The systematic review included 16 studies totalling 1163 procedures with a mean MINORS score of 69%. Mean procedure time was 44 min. Complications were rare: procedural failure (1.2%), haematoma (0.90%), radial artery occlusion (0.74%) and pseudoaneurysm (0.12%). Post-procedural flow increased by an average of 274 mL/min. Pooled primary-assisted patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 88% and 77% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trans-radial approach allows for expedient, safe and durable AVF endovascular surgery, however this technique would benefit from prospective evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1681-1692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241299904\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241299904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:动静脉瘘(AVF)是血液透析的金标准通路方式,但由于患者和技术因素,它很容易发生狭窄和血栓形成。经桡动脉入路具有多种独特优势,但其安全性、效率和有效性尚未在动静脉内瘘方面得到严格研究。本研究提供了经桡动脉动静脉瘘手术的病例系列,并对现有文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以明确经桡动脉方法在血管内动静脉瘘手术中的作用:对手术记录进行了查询,以确定 2019 年至 2021 年间所有的经桡动脉 AVF 介入手术。主要终点是手术时间和并发症发生率。次要终点是主要辅助通畅性和术前术后肱动脉血流的增加。通过检索 2000 年至 2023 年的 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 进行了系统性回顾:结果:该病例系列确定了为 49 名患者实施的 76 例连续手术。平均手术时间为 64 分钟,仅发现一起并发症,即穿刺部位血肿。术后 AVF 平均流量增加了 342 毫升/分钟(P经桡动脉入路可实现快速、安全和持久的动静脉瘘血管内手术,但该技术仍需进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The trans-radial approach for endovascular intervention of the problem arterio-venous fistula: A single-centre case series and systematic review.

Introduction: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard access modality for haemodialysis, but due to patient and technical factors, it is prone to stenosis and thrombosis. The trans-radial approach offers multiple unique benefits, but its safety, efficiency and efficacy have not been rigorously studied in the context of the AVF. This study provides a case series of trans-radial AVF procedures, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature to solidify the role of the trans-radial approach in endovascular AVF surgery.

Methods: Surgical records were interrogated to identify all trans-radial AVF interventions between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoints were procedure time and complication rates. The secondary endpoints were primary assisted patency and increase in pre- and post-operative brachial artery blood flow. The systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from 2000 to 2023.

Results: The case series identified 76 consecutive procedures performed on 49 patients. Mean procedure time was 64 min, and only one complication, a puncture site haematoma, was identified. Mean postoperative AVF flow increase was 342 mL/min (p < 0.001). Primary-assisted patency at 6 and 12 months was 91% and 82% respectively. The systematic review included 16 studies totalling 1163 procedures with a mean MINORS score of 69%. Mean procedure time was 44 min. Complications were rare: procedural failure (1.2%), haematoma (0.90%), radial artery occlusion (0.74%) and pseudoaneurysm (0.12%). Post-procedural flow increased by an average of 274 mL/min. Pooled primary-assisted patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 88% and 77% respectively.

Conclusion: The trans-radial approach allows for expedient, safe and durable AVF endovascular surgery, however this technique would benefit from prospective evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信