通过监测和培训提高血管通路护理质量的影响:多中心观察研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1177/11297298241296163
Sonia Casanova-Vivas, Pablo García-Molina, Pablo López-Guardiola, María José Gil-Carbonell, Enrique Bernardo Hevilla-Cucarella, Vicenta Solaz-Martínez, Beatriz Valdelvira-Gimeno, Alicia Fernández-Martínez, José Vicente Visconti-Gijón, M Luisa Ballestar-Tarín
{"title":"通过监测和培训提高血管通路护理质量的影响:多中心观察研究。","authors":"Sonia Casanova-Vivas, Pablo García-Molina, Pablo López-Guardiola, María José Gil-Carbonell, Enrique Bernardo Hevilla-Cucarella, Vicenta Solaz-Martínez, Beatriz Valdelvira-Gimeno, Alicia Fernández-Martínez, José Vicente Visconti-Gijón, M Luisa Ballestar-Tarín","doi":"10.1177/11297298241296163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of monitoring a primary quality indicator and the effect of training on improving the care and maintenance of vascular access devices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, quasi-experimental, multicentre study with 10 periodical cross-sections from 2017 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients hospitalised over 24 h, with or without vascular access device, excluding those in emergency, psychiatry, outpatients or minor surgery units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 10 cross-sections between 2017 and 2020 in all participating hospitals, using the INCATIV<sup>®</sup> (Quality Indicators in Intravenous Therapy and Vascular Access) questionnaire. Training sessions for nursing staff were conducted between cross-sections, involving face-to-face sessions in open classrooms and clinical sessions in the units, based on the study Care bundle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53,991 vascular accesses were analysed, with an average INCATIV Index score of 8.95 (SD: 1.32), showing improvement from 8.09 in the first cross-section to 9.21 in the last. Significant variability was observed between hospitals, with secondary hospitals scoring lower on the INCATIV<sup>®</sup> Index. Training interventions 1 and 2 showed significant improvement across all hospital categories, whereas intervention 5 did not show significant effects. Compliance with main recommendations was studied, with a notable decrease in phlebitis rates from 4.45% in the first cross-section to 1.23% in the tenth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study developed a single indicator to assess and quantify vascular access care quality. It demonstrated that implementing a care bundle through serial training interventions and continuous assessment by nursing staff, supported by process indicators and data availability on the study platform, significantly reduces complications and enhances the quality and safety of vascular access care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1661-1672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of enhancing vascular access care quality through monitoring and training: A multicentre observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Casanova-Vivas, Pablo García-Molina, Pablo López-Guardiola, María José Gil-Carbonell, Enrique Bernardo Hevilla-Cucarella, Vicenta Solaz-Martínez, Beatriz Valdelvira-Gimeno, Alicia Fernández-Martínez, José Vicente Visconti-Gijón, M Luisa Ballestar-Tarín\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241296163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of monitoring a primary quality indicator and the effect of training on improving the care and maintenance of vascular access devices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, quasi-experimental, multicentre study with 10 periodical cross-sections from 2017 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients hospitalised over 24 h, with or without vascular access device, excluding those in emergency, psychiatry, outpatients or minor surgery units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 10 cross-sections between 2017 and 2020 in all participating hospitals, using the INCATIV<sup>®</sup> (Quality Indicators in Intravenous Therapy and Vascular Access) questionnaire. Training sessions for nursing staff were conducted between cross-sections, involving face-to-face sessions in open classrooms and clinical sessions in the units, based on the study Care bundle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53,991 vascular accesses were analysed, with an average INCATIV Index score of 8.95 (SD: 1.32), showing improvement from 8.09 in the first cross-section to 9.21 in the last. Significant variability was observed between hospitals, with secondary hospitals scoring lower on the INCATIV<sup>®</sup> Index. Training interventions 1 and 2 showed significant improvement across all hospital categories, whereas intervention 5 did not show significant effects. Compliance with main recommendations was studied, with a notable decrease in phlebitis rates from 4.45% in the first cross-section to 1.23% in the tenth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study developed a single indicator to assess and quantify vascular access care quality. It demonstrated that implementing a care bundle through serial training interventions and continuous assessment by nursing staff, supported by process indicators and data availability on the study platform, significantly reduces complications and enhances the quality and safety of vascular access care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1661-1672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241296163\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241296163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估监测主要质量指标的影响以及培训对改善血管通路设备护理和维护的效果:前瞻性、准实验、多中心研究,从 2017 年至 2020 年进行 10 次定期交叉研究:住院超过 24 小时、带或不带血管通路装置的成年患者,不包括急诊、精神病科、门诊或小手术室的患者:研究包括所有参与医院在 2017 年至 2020 年期间的 10 次交叉检查,采用 INCATIV®(静脉治疗和血管通路质量指标)调查问卷。在两次交叉检查之间对护理人员进行了培训,包括在公开课上的面对面培训和在病房内的临床培训,培训内容以研究的护理捆绑包为基础:对 53991 个血管通路进行了分析,INCATIV 指数平均得分为 8.95(标度:1.32),从第一个横断面的 8.09 分提高到最后一个横断面的 9.21 分。不同医院的 INCATIV® 指数差异显著,二级医院的 INCATIV® 指数得分较低。培训干预措施 1 和 2 在所有医院类别中都有明显改善,而干预措施 5 则没有明显效果。对主要建议的遵守情况进行了研究,结果显示静脉炎发生率明显下降,从第一个横断面的 4.45% 降至第十个横断面的 1.23%:该研究开发了一个单一指标来评估和量化血管通路护理质量。研究表明,通过系列培训干预和护理人员的持续评估,在流程指标和研究平台数据可用性的支持下实施护理捆绑,可显著减少并发症,提高血管通路护理的质量和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of enhancing vascular access care quality through monitoring and training: A multicentre observational study.

The impact of enhancing vascular access care quality through monitoring and training: A multicentre observational study.

The impact of enhancing vascular access care quality through monitoring and training: A multicentre observational study.

The impact of enhancing vascular access care quality through monitoring and training: A multicentre observational study.

Aim: This study evaluates the impact of monitoring a primary quality indicator and the effect of training on improving the care and maintenance of vascular access devices.

Design: A prospective, quasi-experimental, multicentre study with 10 periodical cross-sections from 2017 and 2020.

Participants: Adult patients hospitalised over 24 h, with or without vascular access device, excluding those in emergency, psychiatry, outpatients or minor surgery units.

Methods: The study included 10 cross-sections between 2017 and 2020 in all participating hospitals, using the INCATIV® (Quality Indicators in Intravenous Therapy and Vascular Access) questionnaire. Training sessions for nursing staff were conducted between cross-sections, involving face-to-face sessions in open classrooms and clinical sessions in the units, based on the study Care bundle.

Results: 53,991 vascular accesses were analysed, with an average INCATIV Index score of 8.95 (SD: 1.32), showing improvement from 8.09 in the first cross-section to 9.21 in the last. Significant variability was observed between hospitals, with secondary hospitals scoring lower on the INCATIV® Index. Training interventions 1 and 2 showed significant improvement across all hospital categories, whereas intervention 5 did not show significant effects. Compliance with main recommendations was studied, with a notable decrease in phlebitis rates from 4.45% in the first cross-section to 1.23% in the tenth.

Conclusion: The study developed a single indicator to assess and quantify vascular access care quality. It demonstrated that implementing a care bundle through serial training interventions and continuous assessment by nursing staff, supported by process indicators and data availability on the study platform, significantly reduces complications and enhances the quality and safety of vascular access care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信