两种不同长效哌醋甲酯制剂(Medikinet® MR 和 Concerta®)的实际安全性比较--一项基于丹麦全国登记册的队列研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jakob Ørnberg, Anke Mayer, Oliver Dangel, Richard Ammer
{"title":"两种不同长效哌醋甲酯制剂(Medikinet® MR 和 Concerta®)的实际安全性比较--一项基于丹麦全国登记册的队列研究。","authors":"Jakob Ørnberg, Anke Mayer, Oliver Dangel, Richard Ammer","doi":"10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> are long-acting methylphenidate formulations used for the treatment of pediatric and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two formulations have shown comparable safety profiles in two head-to-head randomized controlled trials. However, real-world studies comparing the safety profiles of these products are not available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the real-world safety of Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> using register data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This population-based cohort study was conducted based on data from Danish registries. The study included patients with continuous long-term (i.e., ≥12 months) exposure to either Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR or Concerta<sup>®</sup> between 1995 and 2018. Outcomes included several selected adverse events of interest. A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> generics. For each outcome, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the number of cases between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression models with patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 1249 patients exposed to Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and 2455 patients exposed to Concerta®. No cases of cerebral arteritis or priapism were identified in either cohort. ORs for sudden death and anorexia could not be calculated due to the absence of cases in the Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR cohort. For the remaining outcomes, no statistically significant difference in risk was found between Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR-exposed and Concerta<sup>®</sup>-exposed patients. The sensitivity analysis produced results consistent with those obtained in the main analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this population-based cohort study indicate that Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> have comparable real-world safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the real-world safety of two different long-acting methylphenidate formulations (Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup>) - a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Ørnberg, Anke Mayer, Oliver Dangel, Richard Ammer\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> are long-acting methylphenidate formulations used for the treatment of pediatric and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two formulations have shown comparable safety profiles in two head-to-head randomized controlled trials. However, real-world studies comparing the safety profiles of these products are not available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the real-world safety of Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> using register data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This population-based cohort study was conducted based on data from Danish registries. The study included patients with continuous long-term (i.e., ≥12 months) exposure to either Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR or Concerta<sup>®</sup> between 1995 and 2018. Outcomes included several selected adverse events of interest. A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> generics. For each outcome, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the number of cases between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression models with patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 1249 patients exposed to Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and 2455 patients exposed to Concerta®. No cases of cerebral arteritis or priapism were identified in either cohort. ORs for sudden death and anorexia could not be calculated due to the absence of cases in the Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR cohort. For the remaining outcomes, no statistically significant difference in risk was found between Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR-exposed and Concerta<sup>®</sup>-exposed patients. The sensitivity analysis produced results consistent with those obtained in the main analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this population-based cohort study indicate that Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> have comparable real-world safety profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"84-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585358/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Medikinet® MR 和 Concerta® 是长效哌醋甲酯制剂,用于治疗儿童和成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。这两种制剂在两项头对头随机对照试验中显示出相似的安全性。然而,目前还没有比较这两种产品安全性的实际研究:本研究旨在利用登记数据比较 Medikinet® MR 和 Concerta® 的实际安全性:这项基于人群的队列研究是在丹麦登记册数据的基础上进行的。研究对象包括1995年至2018年期间连续长期(即≥12个月)服用Medikinet® MR或Concerta®的患者。结果包括几种选定的相关不良事件。进行了一项敏感性分析,排除了暴露于 Concerta® 非专利药的患者。对于每种结果,均进行了费雪精确检验,以比较两组之间的病例数。以暴露于 Concerta® 的患者为参照组,使用逻辑回归模型估算出患病率(ORs)和 95% 的置信区间:研究对象包括1249名暴露于Medikinet® MR的患者和2455名暴露于Concerta®的患者。两组患者中均未发现脑动脉炎或腱鞘炎病例。由于 Medikinet® MR 队列中没有病例,因此无法计算猝死和厌食的 ORs。在其余结果中,未发现暴露于 Medikinet® MR 的患者与暴露于 Concerta® 的患者之间存在统计学意义上的显著风险差异。敏感性分析的结果与主要分析的结果一致:这项基于人群的队列研究结果表明,Medikinet® MR 和 Concerta® 在现实世界中具有相似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the real-world safety of two different long-acting methylphenidate formulations (Medikinet® MR and Concerta®) - a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.

Background: Medikinet® MR and Concerta® are long-acting methylphenidate formulations used for the treatment of pediatric and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two formulations have shown comparable safety profiles in two head-to-head randomized controlled trials. However, real-world studies comparing the safety profiles of these products are not available.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the real-world safety of Medikinet® MR and Concerta® using register data.

Method: This population-based cohort study was conducted based on data from Danish registries. The study included patients with continuous long-term (i.e., ≥12 months) exposure to either Medikinet® MR or Concerta® between 1995 and 2018. Outcomes included several selected adverse events of interest. A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding patients exposed to Concerta® generics. For each outcome, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the number of cases between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression models with patients exposed to Concerta® as the reference group.

Results: The study population included 1249 patients exposed to Medikinet® MR and 2455 patients exposed to Concerta®. No cases of cerebral arteritis or priapism were identified in either cohort. ORs for sudden death and anorexia could not be calculated due to the absence of cases in the Medikinet® MR cohort. For the remaining outcomes, no statistically significant difference in risk was found between Medikinet® MR-exposed and Concerta®-exposed patients. The sensitivity analysis produced results consistent with those obtained in the main analysis.

Conclusions: The results of this population-based cohort study indicate that Medikinet® MR and Concerta® have comparable real-world safety profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信