减少血液污染装置有用吗？单一机构比较

IF 3 4区医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.169

Maria E Navas, Salman Siddiq, Laurie Bauer, Jose A Rivera, Anita J White, Stella Ache, Mark Osborne, Nataliya Kachaluba, Brian Klonowski, Christine Robbins, Curtis Donskey

{"title":"减少血液污染装置有用吗？单一机构比较","authors":"Maria E Navas, Salman Siddiq, Laurie Bauer, Jose A Rivera, Anita J White, Stella Ache, Mark Osborne, Nataliya Kachaluba, Brian Klonowski, Christine Robbins, Curtis Donskey","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare two initial specimen diversion devices evaluated over 3 months to investigate their utility in lowering blood culture contamination rates at or below 1%. Overall contamination rates during trial periods were 2.46% and 2.60% but usage was low, whereas device-specific contamination rates were 0.68% and 0.8%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do blood contamination reduction devices work? A single institution comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Maria E Navas, Salman Siddiq, Laurie Bauer, Jose A Rivera, Anita J White, Stella Ache, Mark Osborne, Nataliya Kachaluba, Brian Klonowski, Christine Robbins, Curtis Donskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare two initial specimen diversion devices evaluated over 3 months to investigate their utility in lowering blood culture contamination rates at or below 1%. Overall contamination rates during trial periods were 2.46% and 2.60% but usage was low, whereas device-specific contamination rates were 0.68% and 0.8%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.169\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对两种初始标本分流装置进行了为期 3 个月的评估比较，以研究它们在将血液培养污染率降至 1% 或以下方面的效用。试验期间的总体污染率分别为 2.46% 和 2.60%，但使用率较低，而特定装置的污染率分别为 0.68% 和 0.8%。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do blood contamination reduction devices work? A single institution comparison.

We compare two initial specimen diversion devices evaluated over 3 months to investigate their utility in lowering blood culture contamination rates at or below 1%. Overall contamination rates during trial periods were 2.46% and 2.60% but usage was low, whereas device-specific contamination rates were 0.68% and 0.8%, respectively.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 医学-传染病学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

6.70%

发文量

289

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.