评估酒业渗透和政府保障:国际酒精控制研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
June Yue Yan Leung, Sally Casswell, Steve Randerson, Lathika Athauda, Arvind Banavaram, Sarah Callinan, Orfhlaith Campbell, Surasak Chaiyasong, Song Dearak, Emeka W Dumbili, Laura Romero-García, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Romtawan Kalapat, Khem Karki, Thomas Karlsson, Mom Kong, Shiwei Liu, Norman Danilo Maldonado Vargas, Juan Felipe Gonzalez-Mejía, Timothy Naimi, Keitseope Nthomang, Opeyemi Oladunni, Kwame Owino, Juan Camilo Herrera Palacio, Phasith Phatchana, Pranil Man Singh Pradhan, Ingeborg Rossow, Gillian Shorter, Vanlounny Sibounheuang, Mindaugas Štelemėkas, Dao The Son, Kate Vallance, Wim van Dalen, Ashley Wettlaufer, Arianne Zamora, Jintana Jankhotkaew
{"title":"评估酒业渗透和政府保障:国际酒精控制研究。","authors":"June Yue Yan Leung, Sally Casswell, Steve Randerson, Lathika Athauda, Arvind Banavaram, Sarah Callinan, Orfhlaith Campbell, Surasak Chaiyasong, Song Dearak, Emeka W Dumbili, Laura Romero-García, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Romtawan Kalapat, Khem Karki, Thomas Karlsson, Mom Kong, Shiwei Liu, Norman Danilo Maldonado Vargas, Juan Felipe Gonzalez-Mejía, Timothy Naimi, Keitseope Nthomang, Opeyemi Oladunni, Kwame Owino, Juan Camilo Herrera Palacio, Phasith Phatchana, Pranil Man Singh Pradhan, Ingeborg Rossow, Gillian Shorter, Vanlounny Sibounheuang, Mindaugas Štelemėkas, Dao The Son, Kate Vallance, Wim van Dalen, Ashley Wettlaufer, Arianne Zamora, Jintana Jankhotkaew","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The alcohol industry uses many of the tobacco industry's strategies to influence policy-making, yet unlike the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, there is no intergovernmental guidance on protecting policies from alcohol industry influence. Systematic assessment of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards is also lacking. Here, we aimed to identify the nature and extent of industry penetration in a cross-section of jurisdictions. Using these data, we suggested ways to protect alcohol policies and policy-makers from undue industry influence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the International Alcohol Control Study, researchers from 24 jurisdictions documented whether 22 indicators of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards were present or absent in their location. Several sources of publicly available information were used, such as government or alcohol industry reports, websites, media releases, news articles and research articles. We summarised the responses quantitatively by indicator and jurisdiction. We also extracted examples provided of industry penetration and government safeguards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high levels of alcohol industry penetration overall. Notably, all jurisdictions reported the presence of transnational alcohol corporations, and most (63%) reported government officials or politicians having held industry roles. There were multiple examples of government partnerships or agreements with the alcohol industry as corporate social responsibility activities, and government incentives for the industry in the early COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, government safeguards against alcohol industry influence were limited, with only the Philippines reporting a policy to restrict government interactions with the alcohol industry. It was challenging to obtain publicly available information on multiple indicators of alcohol industry penetration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governments need to put in place stronger measures to protect policies from alcohol industry influence, including restricting interactions and partnerships with the alcohol industry, limiting political contributions and enhancing transparency. Data collection can be improved by measuring these government safeguards in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards: the International Alcohol Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"June Yue Yan Leung, Sally Casswell, Steve Randerson, Lathika Athauda, Arvind Banavaram, Sarah Callinan, Orfhlaith Campbell, Surasak Chaiyasong, Song Dearak, Emeka W Dumbili, Laura Romero-García, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Romtawan Kalapat, Khem Karki, Thomas Karlsson, Mom Kong, Shiwei Liu, Norman Danilo Maldonado Vargas, Juan Felipe Gonzalez-Mejía, Timothy Naimi, Keitseope Nthomang, Opeyemi Oladunni, Kwame Owino, Juan Camilo Herrera Palacio, Phasith Phatchana, Pranil Man Singh Pradhan, Ingeborg Rossow, Gillian Shorter, Vanlounny Sibounheuang, Mindaugas Štelemėkas, Dao The Son, Kate Vallance, Wim van Dalen, Ashley Wettlaufer, Arianne Zamora, Jintana Jankhotkaew\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The alcohol industry uses many of the tobacco industry's strategies to influence policy-making, yet unlike the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, there is no intergovernmental guidance on protecting policies from alcohol industry influence. Systematic assessment of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards is also lacking. Here, we aimed to identify the nature and extent of industry penetration in a cross-section of jurisdictions. Using these data, we suggested ways to protect alcohol policies and policy-makers from undue industry influence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the International Alcohol Control Study, researchers from 24 jurisdictions documented whether 22 indicators of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards were present or absent in their location. Several sources of publicly available information were used, such as government or alcohol industry reports, websites, media releases, news articles and research articles. We summarised the responses quantitatively by indicator and jurisdiction. We also extracted examples provided of industry penetration and government safeguards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were high levels of alcohol industry penetration overall. Notably, all jurisdictions reported the presence of transnational alcohol corporations, and most (63%) reported government officials or politicians having held industry roles. There were multiple examples of government partnerships or agreements with the alcohol industry as corporate social responsibility activities, and government incentives for the industry in the early COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, government safeguards against alcohol industry influence were limited, with only the Philippines reporting a policy to restrict government interactions with the alcohol industry. It was challenging to obtain publicly available information on multiple indicators of alcohol industry penetration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governments need to put in place stronger measures to protect policies from alcohol industry influence, including restricting interactions and partnerships with the alcohol industry, limiting political contributions and enhancing transparency. Data collection can be improved by measuring these government safeguards in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒类行业使用烟草行业的许多策略来影响政策制定,但与《烟草控制框架公约》不同的是,目前还没有关于保护政策免受酒类行业影响的政府间指南。同时,也缺乏对酒类行业渗透和政府保障措施的系统评估。在此,我们旨在确定酒类行业在各辖区渗透的性质和程度。利用这些数据,我们提出了保护酒业政策和政策制定者免受酒业不当影响的方法:作为国际酒精控制研究的一部分,来自 24 个司法管辖区的研究人员记录了其所在地区是否存在酒精行业渗透和政府保障措施的 22 项指标。我们使用了多种公开信息来源,如政府或酒类行业报告、网站、媒体发布、新闻文章和研究文章。我们按指标和辖区对答复进行了量化总结。我们还摘录了行业渗透和政府保障措施方面的实例:结果:总体而言,酒精行业的渗透程度较高。值得注意的是,所有辖区都报告了跨国酒业公司的存在,大多数(63%)辖区都报告了政府官员或政界人士曾在酒业任职。在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,有多个例子表明政府与酒类行业合作或达成协议,作为企业的社会责任活动,以及政府对酒类行业的激励措施。与此相反,政府对酒类行业影响的防范措施却很有限,只有菲律宾报告了限制政府与酒类行业互动的政策。要获得有关酒类行业渗透的多个指标的公开信息具有挑战性:结论:各国政府需要采取更有力的措施来保护政策免受酒类行业的影响,包括限制与酒类行业的互动和合作、限制政治献金和提高透明度。在今后的研究中,可以通过衡量政府的这些保障措施来改进数据收集工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards: the International Alcohol Control Study.

Background: The alcohol industry uses many of the tobacco industry's strategies to influence policy-making, yet unlike the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, there is no intergovernmental guidance on protecting policies from alcohol industry influence. Systematic assessment of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards is also lacking. Here, we aimed to identify the nature and extent of industry penetration in a cross-section of jurisdictions. Using these data, we suggested ways to protect alcohol policies and policy-makers from undue industry influence.

Methods: As part of the International Alcohol Control Study, researchers from 24 jurisdictions documented whether 22 indicators of alcohol industry penetration and government safeguards were present or absent in their location. Several sources of publicly available information were used, such as government or alcohol industry reports, websites, media releases, news articles and research articles. We summarised the responses quantitatively by indicator and jurisdiction. We also extracted examples provided of industry penetration and government safeguards.

Results: There were high levels of alcohol industry penetration overall. Notably, all jurisdictions reported the presence of transnational alcohol corporations, and most (63%) reported government officials or politicians having held industry roles. There were multiple examples of government partnerships or agreements with the alcohol industry as corporate social responsibility activities, and government incentives for the industry in the early COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, government safeguards against alcohol industry influence were limited, with only the Philippines reporting a policy to restrict government interactions with the alcohol industry. It was challenging to obtain publicly available information on multiple indicators of alcohol industry penetration.

Conclusion: Governments need to put in place stronger measures to protect policies from alcohol industry influence, including restricting interactions and partnerships with the alcohol industry, limiting political contributions and enhancing transparency. Data collection can be improved by measuring these government safeguards in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信