{"title":"膝伤后遗症检测中的机器学习:揭示心理因素的作用并预防长期后遗症","authors":"Clément LIPPS LENE, Julien Frere, Thierry Weissland","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms—decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Also, higher AUC values were obtained from MLP compared to XGB or DT (<i>p</i> < 0.001). XGB exhibited higher AUC values than DT (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae\",\"authors\":\"Clément LIPPS LENE, Julien Frere, Thierry Weissland\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms—decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Also, higher AUC values were obtained from MLP compared to XGB or DT (<i>p</i> < 0.001). XGB exhibited higher AUC values than DT (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70081\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 本研究评估了三种机器学习(ML)算法--决策树(DT)、多层感知器(MLP)和极梯度提升(XGB)--在识别数月至数年前受过膝伤的普通运动员方面的性能。此外,还评估了心理变量和生物力学变量对 ML 算法分类性能的贡献,以便更好地确定恢复竞技运动的因素,尽可能降低新的膝关节损伤风险。 方法 96 名运动员(36 人曾受过膝伤,平均每周练习 5.7±2.4 小时)参加了弹道测力计上的水平力-速度测试,该测试提供了每个下肢的力、速度和功率数据。他们还填写了一份心理问卷,其中包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)和运动焦虑量表(SAS)的部分内容。三种 ML 算法在一千个不同的训练-测试集上进行了训练。此外,还计算了数据集中每个输入变量的 Shapley 值,以突出其对 ML 模型预测的贡献。 结果 在一千次交叉验证中,当考虑到心理属性时,曲线下面积(AUC)值较高(p < 0.001)。此外,与 XGB 或 DT 相比,MLP 的 AUC 值更高(p < 0.001)。XGB 的 AUC 值高于 DT(p < 0.001)。 结论 我们的结果表明,与生物力学因素相比,心理因素在识别中起着更重要的作用,KOOS 和 SAS 分数在影响因素列表中名列前茅。此外,在膝关节损伤的分类任务中,MLP 的计算稳定性值得推荐。 证据等级 III 级。
Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae
Purpose
This study evaluated the performance of three machine learning (ML) algorithms—decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—in identifying regular athletes who suffered a knee injury several months to years prior. In addition, the contribution of psychological variables in addition to biomechanical ones in the classification performance of the ML algorithms was assessed, to better identify factors to get back to competitive sport with the lowest possible risk of new knee injury.
Methods
A cohort of 96 athletes, 36 with prior knee injuries, practicing an average of 5.7 ± 2.4 h per week, participated in a horizontal force-velocity test on a ballistic ergometer providing data of force, velocity and power from each lower limb. They also completed a psychological questionnaire, which included components from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Sport Anxiety Scale (SAS). The three ML algorithms were trained on a thousand different train-test sets. Also, Shapley values were calculated for each input variable of a data set to highlight its contribution to the prediction from an ML model.
Results
Over a thousand cross-validations, higher area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained when accounted for the psychological attributes (p < 0.001). Also, higher AUC values were obtained from MLP compared to XGB or DT (p < 0.001). XGB exhibited higher AUC values than DT (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Our results suggested that psychological factors play a more important role in recognition than biomechanical factors, with KOOS and SAS scores ranking high in the list of influential factors. Additionally, the computing stability of MLP could be recommended for classification tasks in the context of knee injuries.