{"title":"法院是否驳回了住院医生对大学提出的《第七章》报复申诉?","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/casr.31338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A Black man began his second year of residency at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. He was one of two Black residents. The resident claimed that he experienced discrimination largely involving an attending physician at the medical facility. He claimed that the physician regularly subjected him to excessive scrutiny and ongoing criticism. The resident further contended that no clear, objective standards were used to evaluate his work.</p>","PeriodicalId":100210,"journal":{"name":"Campus Security Report","volume":"21 8","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did court dismiss medical resident's Title VII retaliation claim against university?\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lyerly Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/casr.31338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A Black man began his second year of residency at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. He was one of two Black residents. The resident claimed that he experienced discrimination largely involving an attending physician at the medical facility. He claimed that the physician regularly subjected him to excessive scrutiny and ongoing criticism. The resident further contended that no clear, objective standards were used to evaluate his work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Security Report\",\"volume\":\"21 8\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Security Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.31338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Security Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.31338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Did court dismiss medical resident's Title VII retaliation claim against university?
A Black man began his second year of residency at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. He was one of two Black residents. The resident claimed that he experienced discrimination largely involving an attending physician at the medical facility. He claimed that the physician regularly subjected him to excessive scrutiny and ongoing criticism. The resident further contended that no clear, objective standards were used to evaluate his work.