Alejandro G. Frank , Timothy J. Sturgeon , Guilherme B. Benitez , Giuliano A. Marodin , Samantha Ferreira e Cunha
{"title":"精益和工业 4.0 如何影响工人成果和运营绩效:对竞争模式的量化评估","authors":"Alejandro G. Frank , Timothy J. Sturgeon , Guilherme B. Benitez , Giuliano A. Marodin , Samantha Ferreira e Cunha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the relationship between Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0, two paradigms that have shaped modern manufacturing. While Lean Manufacturing seeks to optimize sociotechnical systems by integrating workers, processes, and technologies, the focus of Industry 4.0 is to integrate digital technologies into manufacturing processes. Related literature has considered a diversity of relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 but used contradictory models to explain their associations to operational performance. Also, while much attention has been given to the contribution of Lean and Industry 4.0 to operational performance, little is known about their effect on worker outcomes. Therefore, we aim to investigate how these two paradigms interact and their effects on both operational performance and worker outcomes. We propose competing research models – mediation and moderation – to explain plausible relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 on worker outcomes and operational performance. We test these models through empirical analysis of survey data from 415 manufacturing companies. Our results reveal that Industry 4.0 technologies act as antecedents when they are used to enhance Lean practices for operational performance (Lean as mediator) but serve as moderators in shaping worker outcomes within Lean systems. We also examine the detailed relationships between specific Lean bundles and Industry 4.0 technologies. Our findings highlight the need to strategically balance the adoption of technologies that support Lean for operational performance improvements with technologies that modify worker activities to enhance overall worker outcomes. We contribute to reconciling different perspectives on Lean and Industry 4.0 in the design of sociotechnical manufacturing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 109475"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How lean and industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro G. Frank , Timothy J. Sturgeon , Guilherme B. Benitez , Giuliano A. Marodin , Samantha Ferreira e Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the relationship between Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0, two paradigms that have shaped modern manufacturing. While Lean Manufacturing seeks to optimize sociotechnical systems by integrating workers, processes, and technologies, the focus of Industry 4.0 is to integrate digital technologies into manufacturing processes. Related literature has considered a diversity of relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 but used contradictory models to explain their associations to operational performance. Also, while much attention has been given to the contribution of Lean and Industry 4.0 to operational performance, little is known about their effect on worker outcomes. Therefore, we aim to investigate how these two paradigms interact and their effects on both operational performance and worker outcomes. We propose competing research models – mediation and moderation – to explain plausible relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 on worker outcomes and operational performance. We test these models through empirical analysis of survey data from 415 manufacturing companies. Our results reveal that Industry 4.0 technologies act as antecedents when they are used to enhance Lean practices for operational performance (Lean as mediator) but serve as moderators in shaping worker outcomes within Lean systems. We also examine the detailed relationships between specific Lean bundles and Industry 4.0 technologies. Our findings highlight the need to strategically balance the adoption of technologies that support Lean for operational performance improvements with technologies that modify worker activities to enhance overall worker outcomes. We contribute to reconciling different perspectives on Lean and Industry 4.0 in the design of sociotechnical manufacturing systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003323\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How lean and industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models
This study explores the relationship between Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0, two paradigms that have shaped modern manufacturing. While Lean Manufacturing seeks to optimize sociotechnical systems by integrating workers, processes, and technologies, the focus of Industry 4.0 is to integrate digital technologies into manufacturing processes. Related literature has considered a diversity of relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 but used contradictory models to explain their associations to operational performance. Also, while much attention has been given to the contribution of Lean and Industry 4.0 to operational performance, little is known about their effect on worker outcomes. Therefore, we aim to investigate how these two paradigms interact and their effects on both operational performance and worker outcomes. We propose competing research models – mediation and moderation – to explain plausible relationships between Lean and Industry 4.0 on worker outcomes and operational performance. We test these models through empirical analysis of survey data from 415 manufacturing companies. Our results reveal that Industry 4.0 technologies act as antecedents when they are used to enhance Lean practices for operational performance (Lean as mediator) but serve as moderators in shaping worker outcomes within Lean systems. We also examine the detailed relationships between specific Lean bundles and Industry 4.0 technologies. Our findings highlight the need to strategically balance the adoption of technologies that support Lean for operational performance improvements with technologies that modify worker activities to enhance overall worker outcomes. We contribute to reconciling different perspectives on Lean and Industry 4.0 in the design of sociotechnical manufacturing systems.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.