体育锻炼能否有效改善髋关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛、功能活动能力和生活质量?系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Suziany dos Santos Caduda , Talita Santos Andrade , Mayara Alves Menezes , Talita Leite dos Santos Moraes , Igor Borges Silva , Jader Pereira de Farias Neto , Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior
{"title":"体育锻炼能否有效改善髋关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛、功能活动能力和生活质量?系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Suziany dos Santos Caduda ,&nbsp;Talita Santos Andrade ,&nbsp;Mayara Alves Menezes ,&nbsp;Talita Leite dos Santos Moraes ,&nbsp;Igor Borges Silva ,&nbsp;Jader Pereira de Farias Neto ,&nbsp;Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of physical exercise and its implications on pain, functional mobility (FM) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with isolated hip osteoarthritis (HO).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Intervention systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Literature search</h3><div>Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane) and PEDro were searched for studies evaluating the effect of exercise on pain, FM and QoL in people with HO from the first publication until August 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection criteria</h3><div>Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality of evidence. We included randomized controlled trials on HO where the intervention was physical exercise compared with the control group (exercise different from the intervention or no intervention).</div></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><div>Available data were analyzed using meta-analysis when comparison was possible. Otherwise, the data were synthesized qualitatively. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the <em>Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</em></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven trials were identified. Low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference between the mixed exercise versus no intervention groups in the meta-analysis for pain and QoL in short term. Low-quality evidence indicated that low-intensity resistance exercise showed a statistically significant difference when compared to high-intensity resistance exercise in terms of pain, and very low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference regarding functional mobility, both in short term.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>New clinical trials with methodological rigor should be carried out to investigate the effectiveness of physical exercise in individuals with HO and which is the most effective modality in pain, FM and QoL for future clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 121-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is physical exercise effective in improving pain, functional mobility and quality of life in individuals with hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Suziany dos Santos Caduda ,&nbsp;Talita Santos Andrade ,&nbsp;Mayara Alves Menezes ,&nbsp;Talita Leite dos Santos Moraes ,&nbsp;Igor Borges Silva ,&nbsp;Jader Pereira de Farias Neto ,&nbsp;Walderi Monteiro da Silva Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of physical exercise and its implications on pain, functional mobility (FM) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with isolated hip osteoarthritis (HO).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Intervention systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Literature search</h3><div>Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane) and PEDro were searched for studies evaluating the effect of exercise on pain, FM and QoL in people with HO from the first publication until August 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection criteria</h3><div>Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality of evidence. We included randomized controlled trials on HO where the intervention was physical exercise compared with the control group (exercise different from the intervention or no intervention).</div></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><div>Available data were analyzed using meta-analysis when comparison was possible. Otherwise, the data were synthesized qualitatively. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the <em>Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</em></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven trials were identified. Low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference between the mixed exercise versus no intervention groups in the meta-analysis for pain and QoL in short term. Low-quality evidence indicated that low-intensity resistance exercise showed a statistically significant difference when compared to high-intensity resistance exercise in terms of pain, and very low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference regarding functional mobility, both in short term.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>New clinical trials with methodological rigor should be carried out to investigate the effectiveness of physical exercise in individuals with HO and which is the most effective modality in pain, FM and QoL for future clinical decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 121-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估体育锻炼的有效性及其对孤立性髋关节骨性关节炎(HO)患者的疼痛、功能活动度(FM)和生活质量(QoL)的影响.设计干预性系统综述.文献检索检索Pubmed、Embase、CINAHL、CENTRAL(Cochrane)和PEDro,检索自首次发表至2022年8月期间评估体育锻炼对HO患者的疼痛、FM和QoL影响的研究.研究筛选标准两位审稿人独立评估研究的纳入情况和证据质量.我们纳入了对HO进行干预的随机对照试验,这些试验的干预措施是体育锻炼与对照组(不同于干预措施的锻炼或无干预措施)进行比较。否则,对数据进行定性综合。采用 "建议评估、制定和评价分级 "方法对证据质量进行评估。低质量证据表明,在荟萃分析中,混合运动组与无干预组在短期疼痛和 QoL 方面没有显著差异。低质量的证据表明,在疼痛方面,低强度阻力运动与高强度阻力运动相比有显著的统计学差异;在短期功能活动度方面,极低质量的证据表明两者没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is physical exercise effective in improving pain, functional mobility and quality of life in individuals with hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of physical exercise and its implications on pain, functional mobility (FM) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with isolated hip osteoarthritis (HO).

Design

Intervention systematic review.

Literature search

Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane) and PEDro were searched for studies evaluating the effect of exercise on pain, FM and QoL in people with HO from the first publication until August 2022.

Study selection criteria

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality of evidence. We included randomized controlled trials on HO where the intervention was physical exercise compared with the control group (exercise different from the intervention or no intervention).

Data synthesis

Available data were analyzed using meta-analysis when comparison was possible. Otherwise, the data were synthesized qualitatively. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results

Seven trials were identified. Low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference between the mixed exercise versus no intervention groups in the meta-analysis for pain and QoL in short term. Low-quality evidence indicated that low-intensity resistance exercise showed a statistically significant difference when compared to high-intensity resistance exercise in terms of pain, and very low-quality evidence indicated that there was no significant difference regarding functional mobility, both in short term.

Conclusion

New clinical trials with methodological rigor should be carried out to investigate the effectiveness of physical exercise in individuals with HO and which is the most effective modality in pain, FM and QoL for future clinical decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信