退伍军人事务部和医疗保险使用多发性硬化症疾病修饰疗法的情况:对比分析

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel M. Hartung , Glenn D. Graham , Mitchell Wallin , Steven Leipertz , Rebecca Spain
{"title":"退伍军人事务部和医疗保险使用多发性硬化症疾病修饰疗法的情况:对比分析","authors":"Daniel M. Hartung ,&nbsp;Glenn D. Graham ,&nbsp;Mitchell Wallin ,&nbsp;Steven Leipertz ,&nbsp;Rebecca Spain","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-cost disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have created affordability challenges for people with MS (PwMS) and payers. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the US and uses a variety of approaches to manage utilization and cost of MS DMT. The objective of this paper is to compare national utilization trends in the VA to the US Medicare program, another large federal public healthcare program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Counts of PwMS prescribed DMT from 2012 to 2021 in the VA and Medicare programs were used to estimate changes utilization over this period. For each DMT, we estimated the proportion of all DMT users treated in each year. Trends in utilization were compared to identify differences in how these systems manage DMT use. We compared demographics and DMT use between PwMS in the VA to previously published estimates from a Medicare cohort of PwMS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DMT use in PwMS was comparable in VA and Medicare programs (65.9 % vs 69.7 %). In younger (&lt;50 years) PwMS, DMT use was more prevalent in the VA compared to Medicare (85.8 % vs 76.9 %). Between 2012 and 2021, the proportion of patients on DMT using a lower-efficacy agent (interferon beta and glatiramer) declined in both the VA (90–32 %) and Medicare (81–38 %). Oral DMT use (primarily fumarates and sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P] modulators) increased to a similar degree such that by 2021, 39 % of patients in both systems were receiving oral DMT. Use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and rituximab) was consistently higher in the VA than in Medicare. Despite the approval of generic glatiramer and dimethyl fumarate in 2015 and 2020 respectively, 49 % of glatiramer and 58 % of fumarate utilization in the Medicare program continued to be for a branded product in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater DMT use among younger PwMS along with more frequent use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT in VA has the potential to reduce disability and attendant healthcare system costs. Generic DMT adoption in the Medicare program was lower than might be expected. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between DMT utilization, costs, and health outcomes in these populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy use in the department of veteran affairs and Medicare: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M. Hartung ,&nbsp;Glenn D. Graham ,&nbsp;Mitchell Wallin ,&nbsp;Steven Leipertz ,&nbsp;Rebecca Spain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-cost disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have created affordability challenges for people with MS (PwMS) and payers. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the US and uses a variety of approaches to manage utilization and cost of MS DMT. The objective of this paper is to compare national utilization trends in the VA to the US Medicare program, another large federal public healthcare program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Counts of PwMS prescribed DMT from 2012 to 2021 in the VA and Medicare programs were used to estimate changes utilization over this period. For each DMT, we estimated the proportion of all DMT users treated in each year. Trends in utilization were compared to identify differences in how these systems manage DMT use. We compared demographics and DMT use between PwMS in the VA to previously published estimates from a Medicare cohort of PwMS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DMT use in PwMS was comparable in VA and Medicare programs (65.9 % vs 69.7 %). In younger (&lt;50 years) PwMS, DMT use was more prevalent in the VA compared to Medicare (85.8 % vs 76.9 %). Between 2012 and 2021, the proportion of patients on DMT using a lower-efficacy agent (interferon beta and glatiramer) declined in both the VA (90–32 %) and Medicare (81–38 %). Oral DMT use (primarily fumarates and sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P] modulators) increased to a similar degree such that by 2021, 39 % of patients in both systems were receiving oral DMT. Use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and rituximab) was consistently higher in the VA than in Medicare. Despite the approval of generic glatiramer and dimethyl fumarate in 2015 and 2020 respectively, 49 % of glatiramer and 58 % of fumarate utilization in the Medicare program continued to be for a branded product in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater DMT use among younger PwMS along with more frequent use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT in VA has the potential to reduce disability and attendant healthcare system costs. Generic DMT adoption in the Medicare program was lower than might be expected. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between DMT utilization, costs, and health outcomes in these populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景多发性硬化症(MS)的高成本疾病修饰疗法(DMT)给多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)和付款人带来了负担能力方面的挑战。退伍军人事务部(VA)是美国最大的综合医疗保健系统,采用多种方法管理多发性硬化症 DMT 的使用和成本。本文旨在比较退伍军人事务部和美国医疗保险计划(另一个大型联邦公共医疗保健计划)的全国使用趋势。方法使用退伍军人事务部和美国医疗保险计划 2012 年至 2021 年开具 DMT 的 PwMS 人数来估算这一时期的使用变化。对于每种 DMT,我们估算了每年接受治疗的 DMT 使用者在所有 DMT 使用者中所占的比例。我们对使用趋势进行了比较,以确定这些系统在管理 DMT 使用方面的差异。我们比较了退伍军人事务部的 PwMS 人口统计数据和 DMT 使用情况,以及之前公布的医疗保险队列中 PwMS 的估计数据。结果退伍军人事务部和医疗保险计划中 PwMS 的 DMT 使用情况相当(65.9% vs 69.7%)。在较年轻(50 岁)的 PwMS 中,退伍军人事务部的 DMT 使用率高于医疗保险计划(85.8% 对 76.9%)。2012 年至 2021 年期间,退伍军人事务部(90%-32%)和医疗保险(81%-38%)中使用低效药物(β 干扰素和格拉替雷)的 DMT 患者比例均有所下降。口服 DMT(主要是富马酸盐和 1-磷酸鞘氨醇 [S1P] 调节剂)的使用也有类似程度的增加,到 2021 年,两个系统中均有 39% 的患者接受口服 DMT 治疗。在退伍军人医疗保险中,高效 B 细胞去势 DMT(ocrelizumab、ofatumumab 和利妥昔单抗)的使用率一直高于医疗保险。尽管格拉替雷和富马酸二甲酯的仿制药已分别于 2015 年和 2020 年获得批准,但到 2021 年,医疗保险计划中 49% 的格拉替雷和 58% 的富马酸二甲酯仍在使用品牌产品。医疗保险计划中通用 DMT 的使用率低于预期。未来的研究应评估这些人群中 DMT 的使用、成本和健康结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy use in the department of veteran affairs and Medicare: A comparative analysis

Background

High-cost disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have created affordability challenges for people with MS (PwMS) and payers. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the US and uses a variety of approaches to manage utilization and cost of MS DMT. The objective of this paper is to compare national utilization trends in the VA to the US Medicare program, another large federal public healthcare program.

Methods

Counts of PwMS prescribed DMT from 2012 to 2021 in the VA and Medicare programs were used to estimate changes utilization over this period. For each DMT, we estimated the proportion of all DMT users treated in each year. Trends in utilization were compared to identify differences in how these systems manage DMT use. We compared demographics and DMT use between PwMS in the VA to previously published estimates from a Medicare cohort of PwMS.

Results

DMT use in PwMS was comparable in VA and Medicare programs (65.9 % vs 69.7 %). In younger (<50 years) PwMS, DMT use was more prevalent in the VA compared to Medicare (85.8 % vs 76.9 %). Between 2012 and 2021, the proportion of patients on DMT using a lower-efficacy agent (interferon beta and glatiramer) declined in both the VA (90–32 %) and Medicare (81–38 %). Oral DMT use (primarily fumarates and sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P] modulators) increased to a similar degree such that by 2021, 39 % of patients in both systems were receiving oral DMT. Use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and rituximab) was consistently higher in the VA than in Medicare. Despite the approval of generic glatiramer and dimethyl fumarate in 2015 and 2020 respectively, 49 % of glatiramer and 58 % of fumarate utilization in the Medicare program continued to be for a branded product in 2021.

Conclusions

Greater DMT use among younger PwMS along with more frequent use of high-efficacy B cell depleting DMT in VA has the potential to reduce disability and attendant healthcare system costs. Generic DMT adoption in the Medicare program was lower than might be expected. Future studies should evaluate the relationship between DMT utilization, costs, and health outcomes in these populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信