Rituparna Sonowal, Alissa Cisneros, Nathaniel J. Hall, Anastasia C. Stellato
{"title":"家庭环境中香味玩具对宠物狗活动量的影响","authors":"Rituparna Sonowal, Alissa Cisneros, Nathaniel J. Hall, Anastasia C. Stellato","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental enrichment with toys can improve the physical and mental well-being of dogs. Despite dogs’ keen sense of smell, there is little known on how providing scented toys influences owned dog behavior. We investigated whether providing scented toys would influence activity levels (dog activity, toy movement, and play) in owned dogs. Experiment 1 assessed owned dog preference (N=30) between scented (beef, chicken, peanut butter, sausage), and non-scented Playology® plush toys using multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) test over 4-days, and measured engagement through ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers over a 72-hour period. Experiment 2 assessed the influence of familiar or novel scented toys on the physical activity and engagement of dogs (N=33), using three equal sized treatment groups: scented familiar (their preferred scented toy from Experiment 1), scented novel (peanut butter scent), and non-scented. Results suggest that MSWO did not predict in-home toy engagement. Dogs did show higher play levels for their most engaging scented toy compared to the non-scented toy, but the specific preferred scent varied by individual dog. Overall activity and play declined with age. In Experiment 2, a habituation effect was observed for dogs in the scented familiar group, as toy movement levels reduced when their preferred scented toy was reintroduced (p = 0.006). While no single scent was preferred across all dogs, individual preference for specific scents increased activity levels, suggesting that personalized enrichment can enhance welfare. Tailoring enrichment practices to individual dog preferences can optimize engagement, while considering the potential impact of habituation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 106451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of scented toy enrichment on owned dog activity levels in a household setting\",\"authors\":\"Rituparna Sonowal, Alissa Cisneros, Nathaniel J. Hall, Anastasia C. Stellato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Environmental enrichment with toys can improve the physical and mental well-being of dogs. Despite dogs’ keen sense of smell, there is little known on how providing scented toys influences owned dog behavior. We investigated whether providing scented toys would influence activity levels (dog activity, toy movement, and play) in owned dogs. Experiment 1 assessed owned dog preference (N=30) between scented (beef, chicken, peanut butter, sausage), and non-scented Playology® plush toys using multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) test over 4-days, and measured engagement through ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers over a 72-hour period. Experiment 2 assessed the influence of familiar or novel scented toys on the physical activity and engagement of dogs (N=33), using three equal sized treatment groups: scented familiar (their preferred scented toy from Experiment 1), scented novel (peanut butter scent), and non-scented. Results suggest that MSWO did not predict in-home toy engagement. Dogs did show higher play levels for their most engaging scented toy compared to the non-scented toy, but the specific preferred scent varied by individual dog. Overall activity and play declined with age. In Experiment 2, a habituation effect was observed for dogs in the scented familiar group, as toy movement levels reduced when their preferred scented toy was reintroduced (p = 0.006). While no single scent was preferred across all dogs, individual preference for specific scents increased activity levels, suggesting that personalized enrichment can enhance welfare. Tailoring enrichment practices to individual dog preferences can optimize engagement, while considering the potential impact of habituation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"281 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002995\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The influence of scented toy enrichment on owned dog activity levels in a household setting
Environmental enrichment with toys can improve the physical and mental well-being of dogs. Despite dogs’ keen sense of smell, there is little known on how providing scented toys influences owned dog behavior. We investigated whether providing scented toys would influence activity levels (dog activity, toy movement, and play) in owned dogs. Experiment 1 assessed owned dog preference (N=30) between scented (beef, chicken, peanut butter, sausage), and non-scented Playology® plush toys using multiple stimulus without replacement (MSWO) test over 4-days, and measured engagement through ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers over a 72-hour period. Experiment 2 assessed the influence of familiar or novel scented toys on the physical activity and engagement of dogs (N=33), using three equal sized treatment groups: scented familiar (their preferred scented toy from Experiment 1), scented novel (peanut butter scent), and non-scented. Results suggest that MSWO did not predict in-home toy engagement. Dogs did show higher play levels for their most engaging scented toy compared to the non-scented toy, but the specific preferred scent varied by individual dog. Overall activity and play declined with age. In Experiment 2, a habituation effect was observed for dogs in the scented familiar group, as toy movement levels reduced when their preferred scented toy was reintroduced (p = 0.006). While no single scent was preferred across all dogs, individual preference for specific scents increased activity levels, suggesting that personalized enrichment can enhance welfare. Tailoring enrichment practices to individual dog preferences can optimize engagement, while considering the potential impact of habituation.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals.
Topics covered include:
-Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare
-Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems
-Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation
-Methodological studies within relevant fields
The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects:
-Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals
-Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display
-Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage
-Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances
-Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements