{"title":"在压水反应堆分析中应用风险知情安全裕度表征法","authors":"Y.M. Chen , D.W. Wu , T.C. Wang , M. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sequence Core Damage Frequency of a pressurized water reactor has been quantified in three initiating events that are Medium Break Loss of Coolant Accident, Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident and Steam Generator Tube Rupture, following a realistic methodology called risk informed safety margin characteristic. The surrogate plant analyzed in the study is a typical pressurized water reactor. The plant adopted two Westinghouse Three-Loop Pressurized Water Reactors with rated thermal power of 2,830 MWt. The phenomenon identification and ranking table is applied for uncertainty analysis. The mitigation actions as described in plant specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment include cooldown and depressurization, emergency cooldown and depressurization, high head safety injection, high head safety recirculation, low head safety recirculation and Refueling Water Storage Tank replenishment. These mitigation actions are analyzed by thermal hydraulic system analysis code RELAP5-3D to determine the successfulness of the actions. The uncertainties of input parameters of the plant conditions are included, and the time of mitigation action executed is treated as one of the input uncertainties. The results of realistic methodology show a decrease in Core Damage Frequency for all three analyzed events in comparison with conventional methodology. The differences between three initiating events are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 111066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of risk informed safety margin characterization to the analysis of a pressurized water reactor\",\"authors\":\"Y.M. Chen , D.W. Wu , T.C. Wang , M. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The sequence Core Damage Frequency of a pressurized water reactor has been quantified in three initiating events that are Medium Break Loss of Coolant Accident, Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident and Steam Generator Tube Rupture, following a realistic methodology called risk informed safety margin characteristic. The surrogate plant analyzed in the study is a typical pressurized water reactor. The plant adopted two Westinghouse Three-Loop Pressurized Water Reactors with rated thermal power of 2,830 MWt. The phenomenon identification and ranking table is applied for uncertainty analysis. The mitigation actions as described in plant specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment include cooldown and depressurization, emergency cooldown and depressurization, high head safety injection, high head safety recirculation, low head safety recirculation and Refueling Water Storage Tank replenishment. These mitigation actions are analyzed by thermal hydraulic system analysis code RELAP5-3D to determine the successfulness of the actions. The uncertainties of input parameters of the plant conditions are included, and the time of mitigation action executed is treated as one of the input uncertainties. The results of realistic methodology show a decrease in Core Damage Frequency for all three analyzed events in comparison with conventional methodology. The differences between three initiating events are also discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of risk informed safety margin characterization to the analysis of a pressurized water reactor
The sequence Core Damage Frequency of a pressurized water reactor has been quantified in three initiating events that are Medium Break Loss of Coolant Accident, Small Break Loss of Coolant Accident and Steam Generator Tube Rupture, following a realistic methodology called risk informed safety margin characteristic. The surrogate plant analyzed in the study is a typical pressurized water reactor. The plant adopted two Westinghouse Three-Loop Pressurized Water Reactors with rated thermal power of 2,830 MWt. The phenomenon identification and ranking table is applied for uncertainty analysis. The mitigation actions as described in plant specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment include cooldown and depressurization, emergency cooldown and depressurization, high head safety injection, high head safety recirculation, low head safety recirculation and Refueling Water Storage Tank replenishment. These mitigation actions are analyzed by thermal hydraulic system analysis code RELAP5-3D to determine the successfulness of the actions. The uncertainties of input parameters of the plant conditions are included, and the time of mitigation action executed is treated as one of the input uncertainties. The results of realistic methodology show a decrease in Core Damage Frequency for all three analyzed events in comparison with conventional methodology. The differences between three initiating events are also discussed.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.