哪些类型的自然接触与享乐型、愉悦型和评价型幸福感相关?18 国研究

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Craig W. McDougall , Lewis R. Elliott , Mathew P. White , James Grellier , Simon Bell , Gregory N. Bratman , Mark Nieuwenhuijsen , Maria L. Lima , Ann Ojala , Marta Cirach , Anne Roiko , Matilda van den Bosch , Lora E. Fleming
{"title":"哪些类型的自然接触与享乐型、愉悦型和评价型幸福感相关?18 国研究","authors":"Craig W. McDougall ,&nbsp;Lewis R. Elliott ,&nbsp;Mathew P. White ,&nbsp;James Grellier ,&nbsp;Simon Bell ,&nbsp;Gregory N. Bratman ,&nbsp;Mark Nieuwenhuijsen ,&nbsp;Maria L. Lima ,&nbsp;Ann Ojala ,&nbsp;Marta Cirach ,&nbsp;Anne Roiko ,&nbsp;Matilda van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Lora E. Fleming","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations between green, coastal and freshwater blue space exposures (including residential availability, visits ‘yesterday’ and visits in the previous four weeks) and hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing were estimated. Overall, residential nature availability showed little association with any wellbeing outcome, whereas visiting green and coastal locations ‘yesterday’ was associated with better hedonic wellbeing. Although frequently visiting green, coastal and freshwater spaces were all associated with greater evaluative wellbeing, greater eudaimonic wellbeing was only associated with frequent visits to green and freshwater spaces. Variations existed across countries. Results suggest that different types of nature exposure vary in their association with different dimensions of SWB. Understanding these differences may help us maximise the potential of natural environments as SWB-promoting resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102479"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study\",\"authors\":\"Craig W. McDougall ,&nbsp;Lewis R. Elliott ,&nbsp;Mathew P. White ,&nbsp;James Grellier ,&nbsp;Simon Bell ,&nbsp;Gregory N. Bratman ,&nbsp;Mark Nieuwenhuijsen ,&nbsp;Maria L. Lima ,&nbsp;Ann Ojala ,&nbsp;Marta Cirach ,&nbsp;Anne Roiko ,&nbsp;Matilda van den Bosch ,&nbsp;Lora E. Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations between green, coastal and freshwater blue space exposures (including residential availability, visits ‘yesterday’ and visits in the previous four weeks) and hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing were estimated. Overall, residential nature availability showed little association with any wellbeing outcome, whereas visiting green and coastal locations ‘yesterday’ was associated with better hedonic wellbeing. Although frequently visiting green, coastal and freshwater spaces were all associated with greater evaluative wellbeing, greater eudaimonic wellbeing was only associated with frequent visits to green and freshwater spaces. Variations existed across countries. Results suggest that different types of nature exposure vary in their association with different dimensions of SWB. Understanding these differences may help us maximise the potential of natural environments as SWB-promoting resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002524\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在大自然中度过一段时间可以改善主观幸福感(SWB),但人们对不同类型的大自然接触如何与 SWB 的不同维度相关联或不同国家/文化背景下的关联一致性知之甚少。利用来自 18 个国家的数据,我们估算了绿色、沿海和淡水蓝色空间(包括住宅可用性、"昨天 "的访问次数和前四周的访问次数)与享乐型、快乐型和评价型幸福感之间的关系。总体而言,居住地的自然可用性与任何幸福感结果的关联都不大,而 "昨天 "访问绿色和沿海地区则与更好的享乐幸福感有关。虽然经常访问绿色、沿海和淡水空间都与较高的评价性幸福感有关,但较高的享乐性幸福感只与经常访问绿色和淡水空间有关。不同国家之间存在差异。研究结果表明,接触自然的不同类型与全部门幸福感的不同维度之间的关系各不相同。了解这些差异可能有助于我们最大限度地发挥自然环境作为促进 SWB 资源的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
Although spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations between green, coastal and freshwater blue space exposures (including residential availability, visits ‘yesterday’ and visits in the previous four weeks) and hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing were estimated. Overall, residential nature availability showed little association with any wellbeing outcome, whereas visiting green and coastal locations ‘yesterday’ was associated with better hedonic wellbeing. Although frequently visiting green, coastal and freshwater spaces were all associated with greater evaluative wellbeing, greater eudaimonic wellbeing was only associated with frequent visits to green and freshwater spaces. Variations existed across countries. Results suggest that different types of nature exposure vary in their association with different dimensions of SWB. Understanding these differences may help us maximise the potential of natural environments as SWB-promoting resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信