基于交互的高效分布式系统离线运行时验证与生命线移除

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Erwan Mahe , Boutheina Bannour , Christophe Gaston , Pascale Le Gall
{"title":"基于交互的高效分布式系统离线运行时验证与生命线移除","authors":"Erwan Mahe ,&nbsp;Boutheina Bannour ,&nbsp;Christophe Gaston ,&nbsp;Pascale Le Gall","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Runtime Verification (RV) refers to a family of techniques in which system executions are observed and confronted to formal specifications, with the aim of identifying faults. In offline RV, observation and verification are done in two separate and successive steps. In this paper, we define an approach to offline RV of Distributed Systems (DS) against interactions. Interactions are formal models describing communications within a DS. A DS is composed of subsystems deployed on different machines and interacting via message passing to achieve common goals. Therefore, observing executions of a DS entails logging a collection of local execution traces, one for each subsystem, collected on its host machine. We call <em>multi-trace</em> such observational artifacts. A major challenge in analyzing multi-traces is that there are no practical means to synchronize the ends of observations of all the local traces. We address this via an operation called lifeline removal, which we apply on-the-fly to the specification during the verification of a multi-trace once a local trace has been entirely analyzed. This operation removes from the interaction the specification of actions occurring on the subsystem that is no longer observed. This may allow further execution of the specification by removing potential deadlock. We prove the correctness of the resulting RV algorithm and introduce two optimization techniques, which we also prove correct. We implement a Partial Order Reduction (POR) technique by selecting a one-unambiguous action (as a unique first step to a linearization) whose existence is determined via the lifeline removal operator. Additionally, Local Analyses (LOC), i.e., the verification of local traces, can be leveraged during the global multi-trace analysis to prove failure more quickly. Experiments illustrate the application of our RV approach and the benefits of our optimizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 103230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient interaction-based offline runtime verification of distributed systems with lifeline removal\",\"authors\":\"Erwan Mahe ,&nbsp;Boutheina Bannour ,&nbsp;Christophe Gaston ,&nbsp;Pascale Le Gall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Runtime Verification (RV) refers to a family of techniques in which system executions are observed and confronted to formal specifications, with the aim of identifying faults. In offline RV, observation and verification are done in two separate and successive steps. In this paper, we define an approach to offline RV of Distributed Systems (DS) against interactions. Interactions are formal models describing communications within a DS. A DS is composed of subsystems deployed on different machines and interacting via message passing to achieve common goals. Therefore, observing executions of a DS entails logging a collection of local execution traces, one for each subsystem, collected on its host machine. We call <em>multi-trace</em> such observational artifacts. A major challenge in analyzing multi-traces is that there are no practical means to synchronize the ends of observations of all the local traces. We address this via an operation called lifeline removal, which we apply on-the-fly to the specification during the verification of a multi-trace once a local trace has been entirely analyzed. This operation removes from the interaction the specification of actions occurring on the subsystem that is no longer observed. This may allow further execution of the specification by removing potential deadlock. We prove the correctness of the resulting RV algorithm and introduce two optimization techniques, which we also prove correct. We implement a Partial Order Reduction (POR) technique by selecting a one-unambiguous action (as a unique first step to a linearization) whose existence is determined via the lifeline removal operator. Additionally, Local Analyses (LOC), i.e., the verification of local traces, can be leveraged during the global multi-trace analysis to prove failure more quickly. Experiments illustrate the application of our RV approach and the benefits of our optimizations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324001539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324001539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运行时验证(Runtime Verification,RV)指的是一系列技术,在这些技术中,对系统执行情况进行观察,并与正式规范进行对抗,目的是找出故障。在离线 RV 中,观察和验证是分两个步骤连续进行的。在本文中,我们定义了一种针对交互的分布式系统(DS)离线 RV 方法。交互是描述分布式系统内部通信的正式模型。分布式系统由部署在不同机器上的子系统组成,通过消息传递进行交互以实现共同目标。因此,观察 DS 的执行情况需要记录本地执行跟踪的集合,每个子系统在其主机上收集一个跟踪。我们称多跟踪为观察工件。分析多轨迹的一个主要挑战是,没有切实可行的方法来同步所有本地轨迹的观测结束时间。我们通过一种名为 "生命线移除 "的操作来解决这一问题,在验证多轨迹时,一旦本地轨迹完全分析完毕,我们就会对规范进行即时应用。该操作会从交互中删除不再观察到的子系统上发生的操作规范。这可以通过消除潜在的死锁来进一步执行规范。我们证明了由此产生的 RV 算法的正确性,并引入了两种优化技术,也证明了它们的正确性。我们通过选择一个不明确的动作(作为线性化的唯一第一步)来实现部分阶次缩减(POR)技术,该动作的存在是通过生命线移除算子确定的。此外,在全局多轨迹分析过程中,还可以利用局部分析(LOC),即局部轨迹验证,来更快地证明故障。实验说明了我们的 RV 方法的应用和优化的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient interaction-based offline runtime verification of distributed systems with lifeline removal
Runtime Verification (RV) refers to a family of techniques in which system executions are observed and confronted to formal specifications, with the aim of identifying faults. In offline RV, observation and verification are done in two separate and successive steps. In this paper, we define an approach to offline RV of Distributed Systems (DS) against interactions. Interactions are formal models describing communications within a DS. A DS is composed of subsystems deployed on different machines and interacting via message passing to achieve common goals. Therefore, observing executions of a DS entails logging a collection of local execution traces, one for each subsystem, collected on its host machine. We call multi-trace such observational artifacts. A major challenge in analyzing multi-traces is that there are no practical means to synchronize the ends of observations of all the local traces. We address this via an operation called lifeline removal, which we apply on-the-fly to the specification during the verification of a multi-trace once a local trace has been entirely analyzed. This operation removes from the interaction the specification of actions occurring on the subsystem that is no longer observed. This may allow further execution of the specification by removing potential deadlock. We prove the correctness of the resulting RV algorithm and introduce two optimization techniques, which we also prove correct. We implement a Partial Order Reduction (POR) technique by selecting a one-unambiguous action (as a unique first step to a linearization) whose existence is determined via the lifeline removal operator. Additionally, Local Analyses (LOC), i.e., the verification of local traces, can be leveraged during the global multi-trace analysis to prove failure more quickly. Experiments illustrate the application of our RV approach and the benefits of our optimizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信