了解您的决策,而不是您的模型处方:为商品采购开发可解释的深度学习方法

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Moritz Rettinger , Stefan Minner , Jenny Birzl
{"title":"了解您的决策,而不是您的模型处方:为商品采购开发可解释的深度学习方法","authors":"Moritz Rettinger ,&nbsp;Stefan Minner ,&nbsp;Jenny Birzl","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2024.106905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hedging against price increases is particularly important in times of significant market uncertainty and price volatility. For commodity procuring firms, futures contracts are a widespread means of financially hedging price risks. Recently, digital data-driven decision-support approaches have been developed, with deep learning-based methods achieving outstanding results in capturing non-linear relationships between external features and price trends. Digital procurement systems leverage targeted purchasing decisions of these optimization models, yet the decision-mechanisms are opaque. We employ a prescriptive deep-learning approach modeling hedging decisions as a multi-label time series classification problem. We backtest the performance in two evaluation periods, i.<!--> <!-->e., 2018–2020 and 2021–2023, for natural gas, crude oil, nickel, and copper. The approach performs well in the first evaluation period of the testing framework yet fails to capture market disruptions (pandemic, geopolitical developments) in the second evaluation period, yielding significant hedging losses or degenerating into a simple hand-to-mouth procurement policy. We employ explainable artificial intelligence to analyze the performance for both periods. The results show that the models cannot handle market regime switches and disruptive events within the considered feature set.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understand your decision rather than your model prescription: Towards explainable deep learning approaches for commodity procurement\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Rettinger ,&nbsp;Stefan Minner ,&nbsp;Jenny Birzl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cor.2024.106905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hedging against price increases is particularly important in times of significant market uncertainty and price volatility. For commodity procuring firms, futures contracts are a widespread means of financially hedging price risks. Recently, digital data-driven decision-support approaches have been developed, with deep learning-based methods achieving outstanding results in capturing non-linear relationships between external features and price trends. Digital procurement systems leverage targeted purchasing decisions of these optimization models, yet the decision-mechanisms are opaque. We employ a prescriptive deep-learning approach modeling hedging decisions as a multi-label time series classification problem. We backtest the performance in two evaluation periods, i.<!--> <!-->e., 2018–2020 and 2021–2023, for natural gas, crude oil, nickel, and copper. The approach performs well in the first evaluation period of the testing framework yet fails to capture market disruptions (pandemic, geopolitical developments) in the second evaluation period, yielding significant hedging losses or degenerating into a simple hand-to-mouth procurement policy. We employ explainable artificial intelligence to analyze the performance for both periods. The results show that the models cannot handle market regime switches and disruptive events within the considered feature set.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054824003770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054824003770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在市场严重不确定和价格波动时,对冲价格上涨的风险尤为重要。对于大宗商品采购公司来说,期货合约是一种广泛的金融对冲价格风险的手段。最近,数字数据驱动的决策支持方法得到了发展,其中基于深度学习的方法在捕捉外部特征与价格趋势之间的非线性关系方面取得了突出成果。数字采购系统利用这些优化模型做出有针对性的采购决策,但决策机制并不透明。我们采用了一种规范性深度学习方法,将对冲决策建模为多标签时间序列分类问题。我们在两个评估期(即 2018-2020 年和 2021-2023 年)对天然气、原油、镍和铜的性能进行了回溯测试。该方法在测试框架的第一个评估期表现良好,但在第二个评估期未能捕捉到市场干扰(大流行病、地缘政治发展),导致重大对冲损失或沦为简单的手到擒来采购政策。我们采用可解释人工智能来分析这两个时期的表现。结果表明,在所考虑的特征集中,模型无法处理市场制度转换和破坏性事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understand your decision rather than your model prescription: Towards explainable deep learning approaches for commodity procurement
Hedging against price increases is particularly important in times of significant market uncertainty and price volatility. For commodity procuring firms, futures contracts are a widespread means of financially hedging price risks. Recently, digital data-driven decision-support approaches have been developed, with deep learning-based methods achieving outstanding results in capturing non-linear relationships between external features and price trends. Digital procurement systems leverage targeted purchasing decisions of these optimization models, yet the decision-mechanisms are opaque. We employ a prescriptive deep-learning approach modeling hedging decisions as a multi-label time series classification problem. We backtest the performance in two evaluation periods, i. e., 2018–2020 and 2021–2023, for natural gas, crude oil, nickel, and copper. The approach performs well in the first evaluation period of the testing framework yet fails to capture market disruptions (pandemic, geopolitical developments) in the second evaluation period, yielding significant hedging losses or degenerating into a simple hand-to-mouth procurement policy. We employ explainable artificial intelligence to analyze the performance for both periods. The results show that the models cannot handle market regime switches and disruptive events within the considered feature set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信