回应 Frey 等人对 Goldberg 等人 2022 年研究报告的批评以及鼠疫对濒危花栗鼠风险的影响

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Amanda R. Goldberg
{"title":"回应 Frey 等人对 Goldberg 等人 2022 年研究报告的批评以及鼠疫对濒危花栗鼠风险的影响","authors":"Amanda R. Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We thank Frey et al. for their response to our manuscript as we think this provides an excellent opportunity for further dialogue regarding the effects of plague on wildlife populations and the difficulties in interpreting and explaining how this disease system may function under natural conditions. Herein, we will attempt to directly address some of the criticisms of Goldberg et al. 2022b. We may have been remiss in not providing sufficient detail on the history of our experimental design, which could have led to misconceptions. The criticisms helped point out such weaknesses and we are thankful for the opportunity to address them here.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article e03308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Frey et al.’s critique of Goldberg et al. 2022 and ramifications regarding the risk of plague to an imperiled chipmunk\",\"authors\":\"Amanda R. Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We thank Frey et al. for their response to our manuscript as we think this provides an excellent opportunity for further dialogue regarding the effects of plague on wildlife populations and the difficulties in interpreting and explaining how this disease system may function under natural conditions. Herein, we will attempt to directly address some of the criticisms of Goldberg et al. 2022b. We may have been remiss in not providing sufficient detail on the history of our experimental design, which could have led to misconceptions. The criticisms helped point out such weaknesses and we are thankful for the opportunity to address them here.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们感谢 Frey 等人对我们手稿的回复,因为我们认为这提供了一个极好的机会,可以就鼠疫对野生动物种群的影响以及解释和说明这种疾病系统如何在自然条件下发挥作用的困难展开进一步对话。在此,我们将尝试直接回应戈德伯格等人 2022b 提出的一些批评意见。我们可能疏忽了,没有提供足够详细的实验设计历史,这可能会导致误解。这些批评有助于指出我们的不足之处,我们非常感谢有机会在此对这些批评进行回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Frey et al.’s critique of Goldberg et al. 2022 and ramifications regarding the risk of plague to an imperiled chipmunk
We thank Frey et al. for their response to our manuscript as we think this provides an excellent opportunity for further dialogue regarding the effects of plague on wildlife populations and the difficulties in interpreting and explaining how this disease system may function under natural conditions. Herein, we will attempt to directly address some of the criticisms of Goldberg et al. 2022b. We may have been remiss in not providing sufficient detail on the history of our experimental design, which could have led to misconceptions. The criticisms helped point out such weaknesses and we are thankful for the opportunity to address them here.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信