湿地恢复条件下环境和生物特征对叶片分解的影响

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jiamin Liu , Yang Yu , Manhong Liu , Jiahao Yin , Hongxian Yu , Xiaoyang Ming
{"title":"湿地恢复条件下环境和生物特征对叶片分解的影响","authors":"Jiamin Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Manhong Liu ,&nbsp;Jiahao Yin ,&nbsp;Hongxian Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Ming","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of ecological restoration projects, such as wetland rehabilitation, is essential for achieving sustainable development. However, current research on monitoring recovery status primarily focuses on evaluating water quality and aquatic community structure, with limited understanding of macroinvertebrate and microbial networks, as well as the functions of restored ecosystems. To address this gap, we compared the leaf decomposition rates of reed (<em>Phragmites australis</em>) and sedge (<em>Carex appendiculata</em>) in short-term (1, 2, and 3 years) and long-term (17 years) restoration wetlands, using natural wetlands as controls to assess ecosystem function. Our results indicate that the leaf decomposition rate in restored wetlands is significantly lower than in natural wetlands. No significant difference in decomposition rates was detected between the two types of leaves (<em>P</em>&gt;0.05). All evaluation categories, including biological network structure, influenced leaf decomposition in different wetlands, with distinct effects observed on reed and sedge leaves. Compared to sedges, the decomposition of reed leaves exhibited a stronger correlation with macroinvertebrates while showing a weaker association with microorganisms and co-occurring network topological parameters. Overall, the execution of wetland restoration projects positively influences the recovery of biodiversity co-occurrence networks and ecosystem functions. These findings provide valuable insights for environmental and sustainability assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article e03315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of environmental and biological characteristics on leaf decomposition under wetland restoration conditions\",\"authors\":\"Jiamin Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Manhong Liu ,&nbsp;Jiahao Yin ,&nbsp;Hongxian Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Ming\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The implementation of ecological restoration projects, such as wetland rehabilitation, is essential for achieving sustainable development. However, current research on monitoring recovery status primarily focuses on evaluating water quality and aquatic community structure, with limited understanding of macroinvertebrate and microbial networks, as well as the functions of restored ecosystems. To address this gap, we compared the leaf decomposition rates of reed (<em>Phragmites australis</em>) and sedge (<em>Carex appendiculata</em>) in short-term (1, 2, and 3 years) and long-term (17 years) restoration wetlands, using natural wetlands as controls to assess ecosystem function. Our results indicate that the leaf decomposition rate in restored wetlands is significantly lower than in natural wetlands. No significant difference in decomposition rates was detected between the two types of leaves (<em>P</em>&gt;0.05). All evaluation categories, including biological network structure, influenced leaf decomposition in different wetlands, with distinct effects observed on reed and sedge leaves. Compared to sedges, the decomposition of reed leaves exhibited a stronger correlation with macroinvertebrates while showing a weaker association with microorganisms and co-occurring network topological parameters. Overall, the execution of wetland restoration projects positively influences the recovery of biodiversity co-occurrence networks and ecosystem functions. These findings provide valuable insights for environmental and sustainability assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005195\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实施湿地恢复等生态恢复项目对于实现可持续发展至关重要。然而,目前有关监测恢复状况的研究主要集中在评估水质和水生群落结构上,对大型无脊椎动物和微生物网络以及恢复后生态系统的功能了解有限。为了弥补这一不足,我们比较了短期(1、2 和 3 年)和长期(17 年)恢复湿地中芦苇(Phragmites australis)和莎草(Carex appendiculata)的叶片分解率,并以自然湿地作为对照来评估生态系统功能。我们的结果表明,恢复湿地的叶片分解率明显低于自然湿地。两种叶片的分解率没有明显差异(P>0.05)。包括生物网络结构在内的所有评价类别都会影响不同湿地的叶片分解,芦苇和莎草叶片受到的影响截然不同。与莎草相比,芦苇叶的分解与大型无脊椎动物的相关性更强,而与微生物和共生网络拓扑参数的相关性较弱。总之,湿地恢复项目的实施对生物多样性共存网络和生态系统功能的恢复有积极影响。这些发现为环境和可持续性评估提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of environmental and biological characteristics on leaf decomposition under wetland restoration conditions
The implementation of ecological restoration projects, such as wetland rehabilitation, is essential for achieving sustainable development. However, current research on monitoring recovery status primarily focuses on evaluating water quality and aquatic community structure, with limited understanding of macroinvertebrate and microbial networks, as well as the functions of restored ecosystems. To address this gap, we compared the leaf decomposition rates of reed (Phragmites australis) and sedge (Carex appendiculata) in short-term (1, 2, and 3 years) and long-term (17 years) restoration wetlands, using natural wetlands as controls to assess ecosystem function. Our results indicate that the leaf decomposition rate in restored wetlands is significantly lower than in natural wetlands. No significant difference in decomposition rates was detected between the two types of leaves (P>0.05). All evaluation categories, including biological network structure, influenced leaf decomposition in different wetlands, with distinct effects observed on reed and sedge leaves. Compared to sedges, the decomposition of reed leaves exhibited a stronger correlation with macroinvertebrates while showing a weaker association with microorganisms and co-occurring network topological parameters. Overall, the execution of wetland restoration projects positively influences the recovery of biodiversity co-occurrence networks and ecosystem functions. These findings provide valuable insights for environmental and sustainability assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信