Bridging the gap between toxicity and carcinogenicity of mineral fibres by connecting the fibre parameters to the key characteristics of carcinogens: A comprehensive model inspiring asbestos-induced cancer prevention strategies

Background

Today, many research groups in the world are struggling to fully understand the mechanisms leading to the carcinogenesis of hazardous mineral fibres, like asbestos, in view of devising effective cancer prevention strategies and therapies. Along this research line, our work attempts the completion of a model aimed at evaluating how, and to what extent, physical-crystal-chemical and morphological parameters of mineral fibres prompt adverse effects in vivo leading to carcinogenesis.

Methods

In vitro toxicology tests that deliver information on the 10 key characteristics of carcinogens adopted by the International Association for Research on Cancer (IARC) have been systematically collected for a commercial chrysotile, standard UICC crocidolite and wollastonite. The analysis of the in vitro data allowed us to assess the major fibre parameters responsible for alterations in the key characteristics of carcinogens for each investigated fibre and the intensity of their effect.

Results

Crystal habit and density of the fibres affect exposure but are not major parameters contributing to the KCs. For chrysotile, besides length, we found that fibre parameters that greatly contribute to the KCs are the surface area and the dissolution rate with the related velocity of release of metals (namely iron). For crocidolite, they are the fibre length, iron content and related parameters like the ferrous iron content, iron nuclearity, transition metals content and zeta potential.

Conclusions

The results of our study can be a starting point for developing personalized cancer screening and prevention strategies as long as the nature of the fibre of the exposed patient is known. We can speculate on a future personalized prevention therapy targeting the fibres with surface-engineered nanocarriers with active complexes that are selective for the surface charge of the fibres. For chrysotile, a complex with deferasirox that can chelate Fe²⁺ and deferoxamine that preferentially chelates Fe³⁺ is proposed with the anchorage to the silica chrysotile surface driven by aspartic acid. For crocidolite, deferiprone chelating both Fe³⁺ and Fe²⁺ combined with lysine to attract the silica crocidolite surface is proposed.