Jie Li MM , Yi Xia MD , Taohu Zhou MM , Qian Dong MD , Xiaoqing Lin MM , Lingling Gu MM , Song Jiang RT , Meiling Xu RT , Xinyi Wan RT , Guangwen Duan RT , Dongqing Zhu RT , Rutan Chen RT , Zhihao Zhang MSc , Lei Xiang PhD , Li Fan MD , Shiyuan Liu MD
{"title":"基于深度学习的加速脊柱 MRI 图像重建:与标准 MRI 的前瞻性比较。","authors":"Jie Li MM , Yi Xia MD , Taohu Zhou MM , Qian Dong MD , Xiaoqing Lin MM , Lingling Gu MM , Song Jiang RT , Meiling Xu RT , Xinyi Wan RT , Guangwen Duan RT , Dongqing Zhu RT , Rutan Chen RT , Zhihao Zhang MSc , Lei Xiang PhD , Li Fan MD , Shiyuan Liu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) reconstructed MRI in terms of image acquisition time, overall image quality and diagnostic interchangeability compared to standard-of-care (SOC) MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective study recruited participants between July 2023 and August 2023 who had spinal discomfort. All participants underwent two separate MRI examinations (Standard and accelerated scanning). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and similarity metrics were calculated for quantitative evaluation. Four radiologists performed subjective quality and lesion characteristic assessment. Wilcoxon test was used to assess the differences of SNR, CNR and subjective image quality between DL and SOC. Various lesions of spine were also tested for interchangeability using individual equivalence index. Interreader and intrareader agreement and concordance (κ and Kendall τ and W statistics) were computed and McNemar tests were performed for comprehensive evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>200 participants (107 male patients, mean age 46.56 ± 17.07 years) were included. Compared with SOC, DL enabled scan time reduced by approximately 40%. The SNR and CNR of DL were significantly higher than those of SOC (P < 0.001). DL showed varying degrees of improvement (0–0.35) in each of similarity metrics. All absolute individual equivalence indexes were less than 4%, indicating interchangeability between SOC and DL. Kappa and Kendall showed a good to near-perfect agreement in range of 0.72–0.98. There is no difference between SOC and DL regarding subjective scoring and frequency of lesion detection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to SOC, DL provided high-quality image for diagnosis and reduced examination time for patients. DL was found to be interchangeable with SOC in detecting various spinal abnormalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 2121-2132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated Spine MRI with Deep Learning Based Image Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparison with Standard MRI\",\"authors\":\"Jie Li MM , Yi Xia MD , Taohu Zhou MM , Qian Dong MD , Xiaoqing Lin MM , Lingling Gu MM , Song Jiang RT , Meiling Xu RT , Xinyi Wan RT , Guangwen Duan RT , Dongqing Zhu RT , Rutan Chen RT , Zhihao Zhang MSc , Lei Xiang PhD , Li Fan MD , Shiyuan Liu MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) reconstructed MRI in terms of image acquisition time, overall image quality and diagnostic interchangeability compared to standard-of-care (SOC) MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective study recruited participants between July 2023 and August 2023 who had spinal discomfort. All participants underwent two separate MRI examinations (Standard and accelerated scanning). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and similarity metrics were calculated for quantitative evaluation. Four radiologists performed subjective quality and lesion characteristic assessment. Wilcoxon test was used to assess the differences of SNR, CNR and subjective image quality between DL and SOC. Various lesions of spine were also tested for interchangeability using individual equivalence index. Interreader and intrareader agreement and concordance (κ and Kendall τ and W statistics) were computed and McNemar tests were performed for comprehensive evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>200 participants (107 male patients, mean age 46.56 ± 17.07 years) were included. Compared with SOC, DL enabled scan time reduced by approximately 40%. The SNR and CNR of DL were significantly higher than those of SOC (P < 0.001). DL showed varying degrees of improvement (0–0.35) in each of similarity metrics. All absolute individual equivalence indexes were less than 4%, indicating interchangeability between SOC and DL. Kappa and Kendall showed a good to near-perfect agreement in range of 0.72–0.98. There is no difference between SOC and DL regarding subjective scoring and frequency of lesion detection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to SOC, DL provided high-quality image for diagnosis and reduced examination time for patients. DL was found to be interchangeable with SOC in detecting various spinal abnormalities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2121-2132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107663322400850X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107663322400850X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accelerated Spine MRI with Deep Learning Based Image Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparison with Standard MRI
Rationale and Objectives
To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) reconstructed MRI in terms of image acquisition time, overall image quality and diagnostic interchangeability compared to standard-of-care (SOC) MRI.
Materials and Methods
This prospective study recruited participants between July 2023 and August 2023 who had spinal discomfort. All participants underwent two separate MRI examinations (Standard and accelerated scanning). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and similarity metrics were calculated for quantitative evaluation. Four radiologists performed subjective quality and lesion characteristic assessment. Wilcoxon test was used to assess the differences of SNR, CNR and subjective image quality between DL and SOC. Various lesions of spine were also tested for interchangeability using individual equivalence index. Interreader and intrareader agreement and concordance (κ and Kendall τ and W statistics) were computed and McNemar tests were performed for comprehensive evaluation.
Results
200 participants (107 male patients, mean age 46.56 ± 17.07 years) were included. Compared with SOC, DL enabled scan time reduced by approximately 40%. The SNR and CNR of DL were significantly higher than those of SOC (P < 0.001). DL showed varying degrees of improvement (0–0.35) in each of similarity metrics. All absolute individual equivalence indexes were less than 4%, indicating interchangeability between SOC and DL. Kappa and Kendall showed a good to near-perfect agreement in range of 0.72–0.98. There is no difference between SOC and DL regarding subjective scoring and frequency of lesion detection.
Conclusion
Compared to SOC, DL provided high-quality image for diagnosis and reduced examination time for patients. DL was found to be interchangeable with SOC in detecting various spinal abnormalities.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.