Dustin Morgan, Ellen Lutnick, Christopher Mutty, Mark Anders
{"title":"多学科标准化方案缩短了开放性骨折患者使用抗生素的时间。","authors":"Dustin Morgan, Ellen Lutnick, Christopher Mutty, Mark Anders","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04141-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Wound complications after open fracture are common, including superficial and deep infections. Many factors may contribute to outcomes after open fracture, including comorbidities, injury location and characteristics, timing and quality of surgical debridement, and soft tissue coverage. Early prophylactic antibiotic administration is one of the few modifiable factors demonstrated to reduce infection rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative study at a single Level 1 Trauma Center evaluated patients age > 18 who presented directly to and were admitted with open long-bone fracture. Primary outcome measure was time from arrival to antibiotic administration pre- and post-implementation of a standardized open fracture protocol. Secondary analysis evaluated percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within one hour for open long-bone fracture, injury characteristics and patient demographics influence on time to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time to antibiotic administration improved post-protocol (69 min vs. 39 min, p < 0.001). Patients receiving antibiotics within one hour improved after protocol implementation (42.9% vs. 79.0%, p < 0.001). Antibiotic administration was more often delayed for patients with penetrating injuries compared to blunt injuries (80 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.003). Patients with penetrating injuries were less likely to receive antibiotics within one hour (46% vs 56%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a standardized protocol reduced the time to antibiotic administration and increased the percentage of patients with open fractures receiving antibiotics within one hour. Penetrating injuries were often not appreciated as open fractures during the initial evaluation, which led to a delay in antibiotic administration.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary standardized protocol decreases time to antibiotic administration for open fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Dustin Morgan, Ellen Lutnick, Christopher Mutty, Mark Anders\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00590-024-04141-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Wound complications after open fracture are common, including superficial and deep infections. Many factors may contribute to outcomes after open fracture, including comorbidities, injury location and characteristics, timing and quality of surgical debridement, and soft tissue coverage. Early prophylactic antibiotic administration is one of the few modifiable factors demonstrated to reduce infection rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative study at a single Level 1 Trauma Center evaluated patients age > 18 who presented directly to and were admitted with open long-bone fracture. Primary outcome measure was time from arrival to antibiotic administration pre- and post-implementation of a standardized open fracture protocol. Secondary analysis evaluated percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within one hour for open long-bone fracture, injury characteristics and patient demographics influence on time to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time to antibiotic administration improved post-protocol (69 min vs. 39 min, p < 0.001). Patients receiving antibiotics within one hour improved after protocol implementation (42.9% vs. 79.0%, p < 0.001). Antibiotic administration was more often delayed for patients with penetrating injuries compared to blunt injuries (80 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.003). Patients with penetrating injuries were less likely to receive antibiotics within one hour (46% vs 56%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a standardized protocol reduced the time to antibiotic administration and increased the percentage of patients with open fractures receiving antibiotics within one hour. Penetrating injuries were often not appreciated as open fractures during the initial evaluation, which led to a delay in antibiotic administration.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04141-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04141-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:开放性骨折后的伤口并发症很常见,包括表皮感染和深部感染。影响开放性骨折术后效果的因素很多,包括合并症、受伤部位和特征、手术清创的时间和质量以及软组织覆盖。早期预防性使用抗生素是为数不多的能降低感染率的可改变因素之一:方法:在一家一级创伤中心进行的回顾性比较研究对直接前来就诊并因开放性长骨骨折入院的 18 岁以上患者进行了评估。主要结果指标为实施标准化开放性骨折治疗方案前后,患者从入院到使用抗生素的时间。次要分析评估了开放性长骨骨折患者在一小时内接受抗生素治疗的比例、损伤特征和患者人口统计学特征对抗生素治疗时间的影响:结果:方案实施后,患者接受抗生素治疗的中位时间有所缩短(69 分钟 vs. 39 分钟,p 结论:标准化方案的实施缩短了患者接受抗生素治疗的时间:实施标准化方案缩短了抗生素用药时间,提高了开放性骨折患者在一小时内接受抗生素治疗的比例。在初步评估时,穿透性损伤往往不被视为开放性骨折,这导致了抗生素用药的延迟:证据级别:三级,治疗/护理管理。
Multidisciplinary standardized protocol decreases time to antibiotic administration for open fractures.
Purpose: Wound complications after open fracture are common, including superficial and deep infections. Many factors may contribute to outcomes after open fracture, including comorbidities, injury location and characteristics, timing and quality of surgical debridement, and soft tissue coverage. Early prophylactic antibiotic administration is one of the few modifiable factors demonstrated to reduce infection rates.
Methods: Retrospective comparative study at a single Level 1 Trauma Center evaluated patients age > 18 who presented directly to and were admitted with open long-bone fracture. Primary outcome measure was time from arrival to antibiotic administration pre- and post-implementation of a standardized open fracture protocol. Secondary analysis evaluated percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within one hour for open long-bone fracture, injury characteristics and patient demographics influence on time to antibiotics.
Results: Median time to antibiotic administration improved post-protocol (69 min vs. 39 min, p < 0.001). Patients receiving antibiotics within one hour improved after protocol implementation (42.9% vs. 79.0%, p < 0.001). Antibiotic administration was more often delayed for patients with penetrating injuries compared to blunt injuries (80 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.003). Patients with penetrating injuries were less likely to receive antibiotics within one hour (46% vs 56%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized protocol reduced the time to antibiotic administration and increased the percentage of patients with open fractures receiving antibiotics within one hour. Penetrating injuries were often not appreciated as open fractures during the initial evaluation, which led to a delay in antibiotic administration.
Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.