全身麻醉下颈动脉内膜剥脱术的术中近红外光谱诊断准确性:系统综述与荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P Andrade, João Rocha-Neves
{"title":"全身麻醉下颈动脉内膜剥脱术的术中近红外光谱诊断准确性:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P Andrade, João Rocha-Neves","doi":"10.1177/14574969241282611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a risk of perioperative stroke, particularly during carotid cross-clamping. While neurological monitoring is reliable for patients under regional anesthesia, alternative options are needed for those unsuitable for regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used during CEA, but its diagnostic accuracy varies, particularly under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients under general anesthesia. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies that compared NIRS with the occurrence of immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing CEA under GA. Meta-regression was performed to explore causes of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies involving 5729 patients were included. The results show that NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia under general anesthesia, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.85. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased summary sensitivity while smoking history the presence of CCO and smoking history decreased summary specificity. For postoperative stroke prediction, NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 49.5% and summary specificity of 88.5%, with an AUC-ROC of 0.85.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIRS is a specific but not highly sensitive tool for detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA, and its use in combination with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods is recommended, in order to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"14574969241282611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luís Duarte-Gamas, Mariana Fragão-Marques, Petar Zlatanovic, José P Andrade, João Rocha-Neves\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14574969241282611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a risk of perioperative stroke, particularly during carotid cross-clamping. While neurological monitoring is reliable for patients under regional anesthesia, alternative options are needed for those unsuitable for regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used during CEA, but its diagnostic accuracy varies, particularly under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients under general anesthesia. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies that compared NIRS with the occurrence of immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing CEA under GA. Meta-regression was performed to explore causes of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies involving 5729 patients were included. The results show that NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia under general anesthesia, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.85. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased summary sensitivity while smoking history the presence of CCO and smoking history decreased summary specificity. For postoperative stroke prediction, NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 49.5% and summary specificity of 88.5%, with an AUC-ROC of 0.85.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIRS is a specific but not highly sensitive tool for detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA, and its use in combination with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods is recommended, in order to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14574969241282611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241282611\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241282611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)有围术期中风的风险,尤其是在颈动脉交叉钳夹时。虽然对区域麻醉患者进行神经监测是可靠的,但对不适合区域麻醉的患者则需要其他选择。近红外光谱(NIRS)通常用于 CEA,但其诊断准确性各不相同,尤其是在全身麻醉的情况下:方法:我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以评估术中近红外光谱检测全身麻醉患者钳夹相关血流动力学脑缺血的诊断准确性。在 MEDLINE、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science 上搜索了将 NIRS 与在 GA 下接受 CEA 的患者术后即刻或早期神经功能缺损发生率进行比较的研究。进行了元回归以探索异质性的原因:结果:共纳入 28 项研究,涉及 5729 名患者。结果显示,NIRS 在诊断全身麻醉下钳夹相关性脑缺血方面的灵敏度为 47.5%,特异度为 90.3%,ROC 曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)为 0.85。存在对侧颈动脉闭塞(CCO)会增加简易灵敏度,而吸烟史、存在 CCO 和吸烟史会降低简易特异性。对于术后脑卒中预测,近红外光谱的总体敏感性为 49.5%,总体特异性为 88.5%,AUC-ROC 为 0.85:建议将其与更敏感的神经监测方法结合使用,以指导术中神经保护策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a risk of perioperative stroke, particularly during carotid cross-clamping. While neurological monitoring is reliable for patients under regional anesthesia, alternative options are needed for those unsuitable for regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used during CEA, but its diagnostic accuracy varies, particularly under general anesthesia.

Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients under general anesthesia. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies that compared NIRS with the occurrence of immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing CEA under GA. Meta-regression was performed to explore causes of heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 28 studies involving 5729 patients were included. The results show that NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia under general anesthesia, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.85. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased summary sensitivity while smoking history the presence of CCO and smoking history decreased summary specificity. For postoperative stroke prediction, NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 49.5% and summary specificity of 88.5%, with an AUC-ROC of 0.85.

Conclusions: NIRS is a specific but not highly sensitive tool for detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA, and its use in combination with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods is recommended, in order to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信