13 年间不同级别医疗服务的获取点。不断变化的医疗保健系统中的使用行为。奥地利三波横截面系列研究结果。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Roland Kraxner, Thomas E Dorner, Dominik Roth, Kathryn Hoffmann
{"title":"13 年间不同级别医疗服务的获取点。不断变化的医疗保健系统中的使用行为。奥地利三波横截面系列研究结果。","authors":"Roland Kraxner, Thomas E Dorner, Dominik Roth, Kathryn Hoffmann","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providing health care is a balancing act among human resources, financial pressures and system-intrinsic factors. Understanding the utilization behaviour of primary and secondary care facilities [general practitioners (GPs) vs. specialists, as well as in- and outpatient hospital care] is crucial for a country like Austria, which has free access to all levels of care. The aim of this study was to reassess access point consultations in relation to sociodemographic variables over time. The databases used for this cross-sectional analysis were the Austrian Health Interview Surveys 2006/07, 2014, and 2019, with sample sizes of 15 474, 15 770, and 15 461 persons, respectively. Analyses included patterns of utilization behaviour, multivariable logistic regression models, and diff-in-diff analyses highlighting differences between the observation periods. GP and secondary care consultations increased from 2014 to 2019. While there were fewer GP visits in 2014 than in 2006/07, GP consultation rates grew by 3.2% between 2014 and 2019. Secondary care utilization increased by 5.4%-8.2% between 2006/07 and 2019, with the highest growth in older and less-educated persons. Secondary-level utilization without prior GP visits decreased again in 2019 after peaking in 2014. Utilization of all access points increased over the entire observation period, especially regarding secondary-level care. Higher GP visit rates do not seem to result in a drop in secondary-level consultations. These results emphasize the coordinator role of primary care in ongoing structural health reforms in European countries, such as Austria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access points to different levels of health care over 13 years. Utilization behaviour in a changing health care system. Results of a three-wave cross-sectional series in Austria.\",\"authors\":\"Roland Kraxner, Thomas E Dorner, Dominik Roth, Kathryn Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurpub/ckae180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Providing health care is a balancing act among human resources, financial pressures and system-intrinsic factors. Understanding the utilization behaviour of primary and secondary care facilities [general practitioners (GPs) vs. specialists, as well as in- and outpatient hospital care] is crucial for a country like Austria, which has free access to all levels of care. The aim of this study was to reassess access point consultations in relation to sociodemographic variables over time. The databases used for this cross-sectional analysis were the Austrian Health Interview Surveys 2006/07, 2014, and 2019, with sample sizes of 15 474, 15 770, and 15 461 persons, respectively. Analyses included patterns of utilization behaviour, multivariable logistic regression models, and diff-in-diff analyses highlighting differences between the observation periods. GP and secondary care consultations increased from 2014 to 2019. While there were fewer GP visits in 2014 than in 2006/07, GP consultation rates grew by 3.2% between 2014 and 2019. Secondary care utilization increased by 5.4%-8.2% between 2006/07 and 2019, with the highest growth in older and less-educated persons. Secondary-level utilization without prior GP visits decreased again in 2019 after peaking in 2014. Utilization of all access points increased over the entire observation period, especially regarding secondary-level care. Higher GP visit rates do not seem to result in a drop in secondary-level consultations. These results emphasize the coordinator role of primary care in ongoing structural health reforms in European countries, such as Austria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供医疗服务是人力资源、财政压力和系统内在因素之间的平衡之举。对于奥地利这样一个免费提供各级医疗服务的国家来说,了解初级和二级医疗设施(全科医生与专科医生,以及医院内和门诊医疗服务)的使用行为至关重要。本研究的目的是重新评估随时间变化的社会人口变量与就诊点的关系。这项横断面分析所使用的数据库是奥地利 2006/07、2014 和 2019 年健康访谈调查,样本量分别为 15 474、15 770 和 15 461 人。分析包括利用行为模式、多变量逻辑回归模型和差异分析,以突出观察期间的差异。从 2014 年到 2019 年,全科医生和二级护理咨询有所增加。虽然 2014 年的全科医生就诊人数少于 2006/07 年,但全科医生就诊率在 2014 年至 2019 年期间增长了 3.2%。在 2006/07 年至 2019 年期间,二级医疗利用率增长了 5.4%-8.2%,其中老年人和受教育程度较低者的增长率最高。在 2014 年达到峰值后,未事先接受全科医生诊治的二级医疗利用率在 2019 年再次下降。在整个观察期内,所有就诊点的使用率都有所上升,尤其是二级医疗机构。全科医生就诊率的提高似乎并没有导致二级就诊率的下降。这些结果强调了全科医疗在奥地利等欧洲国家正在进行的结构性医疗改革中的协调作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access points to different levels of health care over 13 years. Utilization behaviour in a changing health care system. Results of a three-wave cross-sectional series in Austria.

Providing health care is a balancing act among human resources, financial pressures and system-intrinsic factors. Understanding the utilization behaviour of primary and secondary care facilities [general practitioners (GPs) vs. specialists, as well as in- and outpatient hospital care] is crucial for a country like Austria, which has free access to all levels of care. The aim of this study was to reassess access point consultations in relation to sociodemographic variables over time. The databases used for this cross-sectional analysis were the Austrian Health Interview Surveys 2006/07, 2014, and 2019, with sample sizes of 15 474, 15 770, and 15 461 persons, respectively. Analyses included patterns of utilization behaviour, multivariable logistic regression models, and diff-in-diff analyses highlighting differences between the observation periods. GP and secondary care consultations increased from 2014 to 2019. While there were fewer GP visits in 2014 than in 2006/07, GP consultation rates grew by 3.2% between 2014 and 2019. Secondary care utilization increased by 5.4%-8.2% between 2006/07 and 2019, with the highest growth in older and less-educated persons. Secondary-level utilization without prior GP visits decreased again in 2019 after peaking in 2014. Utilization of all access points increased over the entire observation period, especially regarding secondary-level care. Higher GP visit rates do not seem to result in a drop in secondary-level consultations. These results emphasize the coordinator role of primary care in ongoing structural health reforms in European countries, such as Austria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信