通过基于两极假设的论证汇总两极意见

IF 2 3区计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3

Charles Dickie, Stefan Lauren, Francesco Belardinelli, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

{"title":"通过基于两极假设的论证汇总两极意见","authors":"Charles Dickie, Stefan Lauren, Francesco Belardinelli, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni","doi":"10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We introduce a novel method to aggregate bipolar argumentation frameworks expressing opinions of different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for bipolar argumentation under different semantics. By leveraging on recent results on judgement aggregation in social choice theory, we prove several preservation results for relevant properties of bipolar ABA using quota and oligarchic rules. Specifically, we prove (positive and negative) results about the preservation of conflict-free, closed, admissible, preferred, complete, set-stable, well-founded and ideal extensions in bipolar ABA, as well as the preservation of acceptability, acyclicity and coherence for individual assumptions. Finally, we illustrate our methodology and results in the context of a case study on opinion aggregation for the treatment of long COVID patients.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregating bipolar opinions through bipolar assumption-based argumentation\",\"authors\":\"Charles Dickie, Stefan Lauren, Francesco Belardinelli, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We introduce a novel method to aggregate bipolar argumentation frameworks expressing opinions of different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for bipolar argumentation under different semantics. By leveraging on recent results on judgement aggregation in social choice theory, we prove several preservation results for relevant properties of bipolar ABA using quota and oligarchic rules. Specifically, we prove (positive and negative) results about the preservation of conflict-free, closed, admissible, preferred, complete, set-stable, well-founded and ideal extensions in bipolar ABA, as well as the preservation of acceptability, acyclicity and coherence for individual assumptions. Finally, we illustrate our methodology and results in the context of a case study on opinion aggregation for the treatment of long COVID patients.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-024-09684-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了一种新方法，用于汇总辩论中表达各方观点的双极论证框架。我们使用基于假设的双极性论证（ABA）作为不同语义下双极性论证的包罗万象的形式主义。通过利用社会选择理论中有关判断聚合的最新成果，我们利用配额和寡头规则证明了双极论证相关属性的几个保存结果。具体来说，我们证明了双极 ABA 中无冲突、封闭、可接受、首选、完整、集合稳定、有理有据和理想扩展的保存结果，以及个别假设的可接受性、非循环性和一致性的保存结果（正反面）。最后，我们将结合一个案例研究来说明我们的方法和结果，该案例研究是关于治疗长期慢性病人的意见汇总。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Aggregating bipolar opinions through bipolar assumption-based argumentation

We introduce a novel method to aggregate bipolar argumentation frameworks expressing opinions of different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for bipolar argumentation under different semantics. By leveraging on recent results on judgement aggregation in social choice theory, we prove several preservation results for relevant properties of bipolar ABA using quota and oligarchic rules. Specifically, we prove (positive and negative) results about the preservation of conflict-free, closed, admissible, preferred, complete, set-stable, well-founded and ideal extensions in bipolar ABA, as well as the preservation of acceptability, acyclicity and coherence for individual assumptions. Finally, we illustrate our methodology and results in the context of a case study on opinion aggregation for the treatment of long COVID patients.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 工程技术-计算机：人工智能

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to: Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent) Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning. Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems. Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness Significant, novel applications of agent technology Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.