Use of commercial WAMs for monitoring individual with lung cancer. A systematic review

This systematic review explored the feasibility and impact of interventions using commercial activity monitors to track physical activity and health-related outcomes during lung cancer treatment. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving commercially available activity trackers that provided monitoring feedback to lung cancer patients. The devices selected were popular models, including Fitbit, Garmin, Apple, Samsung, and Polar. Studies assessing the reliability or validity of these trackers, as well as qualitative studies, protocols, non-English publications, and those featuring non-commercial devices, were excluded. Additionally, studies incorporating physical activity with other interventions (e.g., robotic surgery) were excluded if exercise outcomes could not be analysed independently. Searches were conducted across various electronic databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL Complete®, Science Citation Index, Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed, covering the period from January 2000 to November 2023. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials (RoB 2.0) tools. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, utilising commercial wearable technology for monitoring lung cancer patients over an average of 6.3 ± 4.7 weeks. A key limitation of this review was the wide variation in how interventions were implemented across studies. Yet, the interventions significantly improved daily activity levels and intensity, quality of life, psychological impact, and physical function compared to usual care. These monitors show promise in predicting, monitoring, and detecting physical activity, motivating patients, and aiding in recovery. However, limitations exist, and further evidence is needed to confirm their efficacy as primary monitoring tools in lung cancer treatment.