{"title":"颅内椎动脉夹层患者出现孤立性头痛时,初始血管形态对预后的影响。","authors":"Akito Oshima, Masakazu Higurashi, Hajime Takase, Kyosuke Asada, Sachiko Yamada, Kensuke Tateishi, Tetsuya Yamamoto","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prognosis of isolated headache intracranial vertebral artery dissection (iVAD) without subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or stroke is unknown. The authors of this study aimed to evaluate isolated headache iVAD prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who presented with headache as their main complaint and underwent MRI between November 2016 and August 2022; those with acute isolated headache iVAD who were followed up for vascular morphological stability were eligible for study inclusion. The patients were divided into three groups based on the vascular morphology at initial diagnosis: aneurysm dilatation without stenosis (group 1), aneurysm dilatation with stenosis (group 2), and no aneurysm dilatation (group 3). Prognosis, time to radiological stability, and final vascular morphology were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred five patients with isolated headache iVAD were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 478 (IQR 143-1094) days, none of the patients developed SAH or stroke, but 3/41 (7%) patients in group 1 underwent endovascular intervention for aneurysm enlargement. Patients in group 1 required significantly more long-term follow-up for morphological stability (p = 0.013), primarily due to aneurysm enlargement (p < 0.001), and were more likely to require surgical intervention (p = 0.043) than those in the other two groups. Residual aneurysm risk was significantly associated with initial vascular morphology in group 1 (OR 7.28, 95% CI 2.30-23.1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with isolated headache iVAD had a favorable prognosis. However, patients with aneurysm dilatation without stenosis required the most careful follow-up, as this group had the highest aneurysm enlargement risk from early disease onset through the chronic phase. In such cases, patients may require surgical intervention to prevent critical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of initial vascular morphology on outcomes in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection presenting with isolated headache.\",\"authors\":\"Akito Oshima, Masakazu Higurashi, Hajime Takase, Kyosuke Asada, Sachiko Yamada, Kensuke Tateishi, Tetsuya Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prognosis of isolated headache intracranial vertebral artery dissection (iVAD) without subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or stroke is unknown. The authors of this study aimed to evaluate isolated headache iVAD prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who presented with headache as their main complaint and underwent MRI between November 2016 and August 2022; those with acute isolated headache iVAD who were followed up for vascular morphological stability were eligible for study inclusion. The patients were divided into three groups based on the vascular morphology at initial diagnosis: aneurysm dilatation without stenosis (group 1), aneurysm dilatation with stenosis (group 2), and no aneurysm dilatation (group 3). Prognosis, time to radiological stability, and final vascular morphology were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred five patients with isolated headache iVAD were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 478 (IQR 143-1094) days, none of the patients developed SAH or stroke, but 3/41 (7%) patients in group 1 underwent endovascular intervention for aneurysm enlargement. Patients in group 1 required significantly more long-term follow-up for morphological stability (p = 0.013), primarily due to aneurysm enlargement (p < 0.001), and were more likely to require surgical intervention (p = 0.043) than those in the other two groups. Residual aneurysm risk was significantly associated with initial vascular morphology in group 1 (OR 7.28, 95% CI 2.30-23.1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with isolated headache iVAD had a favorable prognosis. However, patients with aneurysm dilatation without stenosis required the most careful follow-up, as this group had the highest aneurysm enlargement risk from early disease onset through the chronic phase. In such cases, patients may require surgical intervention to prevent critical conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of initial vascular morphology on outcomes in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection presenting with isolated headache.
Objective: The prognosis of isolated headache intracranial vertebral artery dissection (iVAD) without subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or stroke is unknown. The authors of this study aimed to evaluate isolated headache iVAD prognosis.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who presented with headache as their main complaint and underwent MRI between November 2016 and August 2022; those with acute isolated headache iVAD who were followed up for vascular morphological stability were eligible for study inclusion. The patients were divided into three groups based on the vascular morphology at initial diagnosis: aneurysm dilatation without stenosis (group 1), aneurysm dilatation with stenosis (group 2), and no aneurysm dilatation (group 3). Prognosis, time to radiological stability, and final vascular morphology were compared among the groups.
Results: One hundred five patients with isolated headache iVAD were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 478 (IQR 143-1094) days, none of the patients developed SAH or stroke, but 3/41 (7%) patients in group 1 underwent endovascular intervention for aneurysm enlargement. Patients in group 1 required significantly more long-term follow-up for morphological stability (p = 0.013), primarily due to aneurysm enlargement (p < 0.001), and were more likely to require surgical intervention (p = 0.043) than those in the other two groups. Residual aneurysm risk was significantly associated with initial vascular morphology in group 1 (OR 7.28, 95% CI 2.30-23.1, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Most patients with isolated headache iVAD had a favorable prognosis. However, patients with aneurysm dilatation without stenosis required the most careful follow-up, as this group had the highest aneurysm enlargement risk from early disease onset through the chronic phase. In such cases, patients may require surgical intervention to prevent critical conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.