家庭护理服务背景下居家老年人对同步通信技术的使用和体验:定性系统回顾。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Martin Vinther Bavngaard, Anne Lund, Björg Thordardottir, Erik Børve Rasmussen
{"title":"家庭护理服务背景下居家老年人对同步通信技术的使用和体验:定性系统回顾。","authors":"Martin Vinther Bavngaard, Anne Lund, Björg Thordardottir, Erik Børve Rasmussen","doi":"10.2196/59285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>European health care systems regard information and communication technology as a necessity in supporting future health care provision by community home care services to home-dwelling older adults. Communication technology enabling synchronous communication between 2 or more human actors at a distance constitutes a significant component of this ambition, but few reviews have synthesized research relating to this particular type of technology. As evaluations of information and communication technology in health care services favor measurements of effectiveness over the experiences and dynamics of putting these technologies into use, the nuances involved in technology implementation processes are often omitted.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to systematically identify and synthesize qualitative findings on the uses and experiences of synchronous communication technology for home-dwelling older adults in a home care services context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for reporting. We conducted a cross-disciplinary search in 5 databases for papers published between 2011 and 2023 that yielded 4210 citations. A total of 13 studies were included after 4 screening phases and a subsequent appraisal of methodological quality guided by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. From these, prespecified data were extracted and incorporated in a 3-stage thematic synthesis producing 4 analytical themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first theme presented the multiple trajectories that older users' technology acceptance could take, namely straightforward, gradual, partial, and resistance laden, notwithstanding outright rejection. It also emphasized both instrumental and emotional efforts by the older adults' relatives in facilitating acceptance. Moving beyond acceptance, the second theme foregrounded the different types of work involved in attempts to integrate the technology by older users, their relatives, and health care providers. Theme 3 highlighted how the older users' physical and cognitive conditions formed a contextual backdrop challenging this integration work, together with challenges related to spatial context. Finally, consequences derived from taking the technology into use could be of a both enabling and complicating nature as integration reconfigured the way users related to themselves and each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acceptance and integration of synchronous communication technology for older adults involves multiple user groups in work tending to the technology, to the users themselves, and to each other through intergroup negotiations. This review's original contribution consists of its attention to the dynamics across different user groups in deriving consequences from using the technology in question, in addition to its assertion that such consequences may be both intentional and unintentional. We argue that our findings may be used to provide nuance to policies addressing-and practices taking place in-contexts that involve similar user technology constellations to the ones explored in this paper.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023414243; https://tinyurl.com/wrha6j3f.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e59285"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Uses and Experiences of Synchronous Communication Technology for Home-Dwelling Older Adults in a Home Care Services Context: Qualitative Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Vinther Bavngaard, Anne Lund, Björg Thordardottir, Erik Børve Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/59285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>European health care systems regard information and communication technology as a necessity in supporting future health care provision by community home care services to home-dwelling older adults. Communication technology enabling synchronous communication between 2 or more human actors at a distance constitutes a significant component of this ambition, but few reviews have synthesized research relating to this particular type of technology. As evaluations of information and communication technology in health care services favor measurements of effectiveness over the experiences and dynamics of putting these technologies into use, the nuances involved in technology implementation processes are often omitted.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to systematically identify and synthesize qualitative findings on the uses and experiences of synchronous communication technology for home-dwelling older adults in a home care services context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for reporting. We conducted a cross-disciplinary search in 5 databases for papers published between 2011 and 2023 that yielded 4210 citations. A total of 13 studies were included after 4 screening phases and a subsequent appraisal of methodological quality guided by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. From these, prespecified data were extracted and incorporated in a 3-stage thematic synthesis producing 4 analytical themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first theme presented the multiple trajectories that older users' technology acceptance could take, namely straightforward, gradual, partial, and resistance laden, notwithstanding outright rejection. It also emphasized both instrumental and emotional efforts by the older adults' relatives in facilitating acceptance. Moving beyond acceptance, the second theme foregrounded the different types of work involved in attempts to integrate the technology by older users, their relatives, and health care providers. Theme 3 highlighted how the older users' physical and cognitive conditions formed a contextual backdrop challenging this integration work, together with challenges related to spatial context. Finally, consequences derived from taking the technology into use could be of a both enabling and complicating nature as integration reconfigured the way users related to themselves and each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acceptance and integration of synchronous communication technology for older adults involves multiple user groups in work tending to the technology, to the users themselves, and to each other through intergroup negotiations. This review's original contribution consists of its attention to the dynamics across different user groups in deriving consequences from using the technology in question, in addition to its assertion that such consequences may be both intentional and unintentional. We argue that our findings may be used to provide nuance to policies addressing-and practices taking place in-contexts that involve similar user technology constellations to the ones explored in this paper.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023414243; https://tinyurl.com/wrha6j3f.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Internet Research\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"e59285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Internet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/59285\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:欧洲医疗保健系统认为,信息和通信技术是支持未来社区家庭护理服务为居家老年人提供医疗保健服务的必要条件。通信技术可实现两个或更多人之间的远距离同步通信,是这一目标的重要组成部分,但很少有综述对这一特殊类型的技术进行研究。由于对医疗保健服务中的信息和通信技术的评估偏重于对其有效性的衡量,而忽视了将这些技术投入使用的经验和动力,因此技术实施过程中的细微差别往往被忽略:本综述旨在系统地识别和综合有关居家老年人在家庭护理服务中使用同步通信技术的情况和经验的定性研究结果:方法:本综述遵循 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)2020 检查单进行报告。我们在 5 个数据库中对 2011 年至 2023 年间发表的论文进行了跨学科检索,共获得 4210 条引文。经过 4 个筛选阶段以及随后在批判性评估技能计划工具指导下进行的方法学质量评估,共有 13 项研究被纳入其中。从这些研究中提取了预先确定的数据,并将其纳入三阶段主题综合中,产生了 4 个分析主题:第一个主题介绍了老年用户接受技术的多种途径,即直接接受、逐步接受、部分接受和带有抵触情绪的接受,尽管也有完全拒绝的情况。它还强调了老年人的亲属在促进接受方面所做的工具性和情感性努力。除了接受之外,第二个主题还强调了老年用户、其亲属和医疗服务提供者在尝试整合技术时所涉及的不同类型的工作。主题 3 强调了老年用户的身体和认知条件如何构成了挑战这种整合工作的背景,以及与空间环境相关的挑战。最后,由于整合重构了用户与自己和相互之间的关系,因此使用该技术所产生的后果既可能是有利的,也可能是复杂的:结论:老年人对同步通讯技术的接受和整合涉及到多个用户群体,他们在工作中既要照顾到技术,又要照顾到用户本身,还要通过群体间的协商相互照顾。这篇综述的原创性贡献在于,它关注了不同用户群体在使用相关技术过程中产生后果的动态变化,并断言这种后果可能是有意的,也可能是无意的。我们认为,我们的研究结果可用来为涉及与本文所探讨的类似用户技术组合的政策和实践提供细微差别:PROCOMPROPERO CRD42023414243; https://tinyurl.com/wrha6j3f.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Uses and Experiences of Synchronous Communication Technology for Home-Dwelling Older Adults in a Home Care Services Context: Qualitative Systematic Review.

Background: European health care systems regard information and communication technology as a necessity in supporting future health care provision by community home care services to home-dwelling older adults. Communication technology enabling synchronous communication between 2 or more human actors at a distance constitutes a significant component of this ambition, but few reviews have synthesized research relating to this particular type of technology. As evaluations of information and communication technology in health care services favor measurements of effectiveness over the experiences and dynamics of putting these technologies into use, the nuances involved in technology implementation processes are often omitted.

Objective: This review aims to systematically identify and synthesize qualitative findings on the uses and experiences of synchronous communication technology for home-dwelling older adults in a home care services context.

Methods: The review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist for reporting. We conducted a cross-disciplinary search in 5 databases for papers published between 2011 and 2023 that yielded 4210 citations. A total of 13 studies were included after 4 screening phases and a subsequent appraisal of methodological quality guided by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. From these, prespecified data were extracted and incorporated in a 3-stage thematic synthesis producing 4 analytical themes.

Results: The first theme presented the multiple trajectories that older users' technology acceptance could take, namely straightforward, gradual, partial, and resistance laden, notwithstanding outright rejection. It also emphasized both instrumental and emotional efforts by the older adults' relatives in facilitating acceptance. Moving beyond acceptance, the second theme foregrounded the different types of work involved in attempts to integrate the technology by older users, their relatives, and health care providers. Theme 3 highlighted how the older users' physical and cognitive conditions formed a contextual backdrop challenging this integration work, together with challenges related to spatial context. Finally, consequences derived from taking the technology into use could be of a both enabling and complicating nature as integration reconfigured the way users related to themselves and each other.

Conclusions: The acceptance and integration of synchronous communication technology for older adults involves multiple user groups in work tending to the technology, to the users themselves, and to each other through intergroup negotiations. This review's original contribution consists of its attention to the dynamics across different user groups in deriving consequences from using the technology in question, in addition to its assertion that such consequences may be both intentional and unintentional. We argue that our findings may be used to provide nuance to policies addressing-and practices taking place in-contexts that involve similar user technology constellations to the ones explored in this paper.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42023414243; https://tinyurl.com/wrha6j3f.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信