Lauren Borho, Esther Elishaev, Riyue Bao, Emily O'Brien, Kaitlyn Dinkins, Jessica Berger, Michelle Boisen, John Comerci, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Robert P Edwards, Alison Aunkst Garrett, Joseph L Kelley, Jamie Lesnock, Haider S Mahdi, Alexander Olawaiye, Shannon Rush, Paniti Sukumvanich, Sarah Taylor, Ritu Aneja, Lyse Norian, Rebecca C Arend, Francesmary Modugno
{"title":"邻里社会脆弱性与卵巢癌生存率的关系","authors":"Lauren Borho, Esther Elishaev, Riyue Bao, Emily O'Brien, Kaitlyn Dinkins, Jessica Berger, Michelle Boisen, John Comerci, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Robert P Edwards, Alison Aunkst Garrett, Joseph L Kelley, Jamie Lesnock, Haider S Mahdi, Alexander Olawaiye, Shannon Rush, Paniti Sukumvanich, Sarah Taylor, Ritu Aneja, Lyse Norian, Rebecca C Arend, Francesmary Modugno","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer outcomes. The CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) integrates scores for four neighborhood-based SDOH domains (socioeconomic status, household characteristics, minority status, and housing type/transportation) to assess neighborhood social vulnerability (NSV). While NSV has been associated with overall cancer mortality and lung, breast, colon, and endometrial cancer-specific mortality, the relationship between NSV as defined by the SVI and ovarian cancer outcomes remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 177 patients enrolled in an observational ovarian cancer cohort study from October 2012 through September 2022. All patients underwent debulking surgery and completed an entire course of standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy. Follow-up was completed through May 2024. SVI was calculated using census tract at diagnosis. High NSV was defined as SVI in the top quartile of the cohort. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association between NSV and progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After accounting for demographic and clinical factors, high NSV was associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.31 [95% CI:1.48-3.61]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.79 [95% CI:1.10-2.92]; P = 0.02), with neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.29 [95% CI:1.47-3.56]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.71 [95% CI:1.04-2.80]; P = 0.03). Neighborhood housing type/transportation was also associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:1.65 [95% CI:1.07-2.55]; P = 0.02) and trended towards worse OS (HR:1.43 [95% CI: 0.80-2.33]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Higher neighborhood social vulnerability is associated with worse outcomes among ovarian cancer patients. Validating these results in a population-based cohort and assessing programs to reduce neighborhood social vulnerability to improve ovarian cancer outcomes is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"192 ","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of neighborhood social vulnerability with ovarian cancer survival.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Borho, Esther Elishaev, Riyue Bao, Emily O'Brien, Kaitlyn Dinkins, Jessica Berger, Michelle Boisen, John Comerci, Madeleine Courtney-Brooks, Robert P Edwards, Alison Aunkst Garrett, Joseph L Kelley, Jamie Lesnock, Haider S Mahdi, Alexander Olawaiye, Shannon Rush, Paniti Sukumvanich, Sarah Taylor, Ritu Aneja, Lyse Norian, Rebecca C Arend, Francesmary Modugno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer outcomes. The CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) integrates scores for four neighborhood-based SDOH domains (socioeconomic status, household characteristics, minority status, and housing type/transportation) to assess neighborhood social vulnerability (NSV). While NSV has been associated with overall cancer mortality and lung, breast, colon, and endometrial cancer-specific mortality, the relationship between NSV as defined by the SVI and ovarian cancer outcomes remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 177 patients enrolled in an observational ovarian cancer cohort study from October 2012 through September 2022. All patients underwent debulking surgery and completed an entire course of standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy. Follow-up was completed through May 2024. SVI was calculated using census tract at diagnosis. High NSV was defined as SVI in the top quartile of the cohort. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association between NSV and progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After accounting for demographic and clinical factors, high NSV was associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.31 [95% CI:1.48-3.61]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.79 [95% CI:1.10-2.92]; P = 0.02), with neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.29 [95% CI:1.47-3.56]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.71 [95% CI:1.04-2.80]; P = 0.03). Neighborhood housing type/transportation was also associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:1.65 [95% CI:1.07-2.55]; P = 0.02) and trended towards worse OS (HR:1.43 [95% CI: 0.80-2.33]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Higher neighborhood social vulnerability is associated with worse outcomes among ovarian cancer patients. Validating these results in a population-based cohort and assessing programs to reduce neighborhood social vulnerability to improve ovarian cancer outcomes is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"32-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:健康的社会决定因素 (SDOH) 会影响癌症的预后。疾病预防控制中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)综合了四个基于社区的 SDOH 领域(社会经济状况、家庭特征、少数民族状况和住房类型/交通)的得分,以评估社区的社会脆弱性(NSV)。虽然 NSV 与癌症总死亡率以及肺癌、乳腺癌、结肠癌和子宫内膜癌的特异性死亡率有关,但 SVI 所定义的 NSV 与卵巢癌结果之间的关系仍然未知:我们使用了从 2012 年 10 月到 2022 年 9 月参加观察性卵巢癌队列研究的 177 名患者的数据。所有患者都接受了切除手术,并完成了整个疗程的标准铂类化疗。随访至 2024 年 5 月。SVI 根据确诊时的人口统计区进行计算。高 NSV 被定义为 SVI 在队列的前四分之一。Cox比例危险模型评估了NSV与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)之间的关系:结果:在考虑了人口统计学和临床因素后,高 NSV 与较差的 PFS 显著相关(HR:2.31 [95% CI:1.48-3.61];P 结论和相关性:较高的邻里社会脆弱性与卵巢癌患者较差的预后有关。有必要在基于人群的队列中验证这些结果,并评估降低邻里社会脆弱性以改善卵巢癌预后的方案。
Association of neighborhood social vulnerability with ovarian cancer survival.
Objective: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer outcomes. The CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) integrates scores for four neighborhood-based SDOH domains (socioeconomic status, household characteristics, minority status, and housing type/transportation) to assess neighborhood social vulnerability (NSV). While NSV has been associated with overall cancer mortality and lung, breast, colon, and endometrial cancer-specific mortality, the relationship between NSV as defined by the SVI and ovarian cancer outcomes remains unknown.
Methods: We used data from 177 patients enrolled in an observational ovarian cancer cohort study from October 2012 through September 2022. All patients underwent debulking surgery and completed an entire course of standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy. Follow-up was completed through May 2024. SVI was calculated using census tract at diagnosis. High NSV was defined as SVI in the top quartile of the cohort. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association between NSV and progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival.
Results: After accounting for demographic and clinical factors, high NSV was associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.31 [95% CI:1.48-3.61]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.79 [95% CI:1.10-2.92]; P = 0.02), with neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:2.29 [95% CI:1.47-3.56]; P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.71 [95% CI:1.04-2.80]; P = 0.03). Neighborhood housing type/transportation was also associated with significantly worse PFS (HR:1.65 [95% CI:1.07-2.55]; P = 0.02) and trended towards worse OS (HR:1.43 [95% CI: 0.80-2.33]).
Conclusion and relevance: Higher neighborhood social vulnerability is associated with worse outcomes among ovarian cancer patients. Validating these results in a population-based cohort and assessing programs to reduce neighborhood social vulnerability to improve ovarian cancer outcomes is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published.
Research Areas Include:
• Cell and molecular biology
• Chemotherapy
• Cytology
• Endocrinology
• Epidemiology
• Genetics
• Gynecologic surgery
• Immunology
• Pathology
• Radiotherapy