{"title":"用于评估美罗培南和丙戊酸之间药物相互作用的 PBPK 模型。","authors":"Hongrui Liu, Yiqun Yu, Yulin Qin, Bing Han","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study aimed to quantitatively investigate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) mechanism between meropenem (MEPM) and valproic acid (VPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, we firstly developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MEPM and VPA. The verified PBPK model was then used to quantitatively investigate the potential DDI between MEPM and VPA. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of acylpeptide hydrolase (APEH) on DDI was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our simulation, the plasma concentration of hydrolysate of VPAG decreased to 63% when combined with MEPM. Total plasma concentration of VPA before carbapenem use was 53.61 mg/L, whereas it was 45.42 mg/L during carbapenem use. The inhibition of hydrolysis of VPAG by MEPM alone could not result in a rapid and substantial decrease in the plasma concentration of VPA. Parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the changes of absorption played an important role in the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of VPA, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was more susceptible to elimination changes. In addition, a decrease in APEH activity had little impact on the plasma pharmacokinetics of VPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DDI between MEPM and VPA might be a comprehensive result of multiple factors. On the basis of our simulation, interval medication of MEPM injection and VPA immediate release tablet at 4-6 h timed interval was recommended, or intravenous administration of VPA solution was preferred when combination regimen was necessary in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PBPK modelling for the evaluation of drug-drug interaction between meropenem and valproic acid.\",\"authors\":\"Hongrui Liu, Yiqun Yu, Yulin Qin, Bing Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study aimed to quantitatively investigate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) mechanism between meropenem (MEPM) and valproic acid (VPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, we firstly developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MEPM and VPA. The verified PBPK model was then used to quantitatively investigate the potential DDI between MEPM and VPA. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of acylpeptide hydrolase (APEH) on DDI was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our simulation, the plasma concentration of hydrolysate of VPAG decreased to 63% when combined with MEPM. Total plasma concentration of VPA before carbapenem use was 53.61 mg/L, whereas it was 45.42 mg/L during carbapenem use. The inhibition of hydrolysis of VPAG by MEPM alone could not result in a rapid and substantial decrease in the plasma concentration of VPA. Parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the changes of absorption played an important role in the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of VPA, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was more susceptible to elimination changes. In addition, a decrease in APEH activity had little impact on the plasma pharmacokinetics of VPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DDI between MEPM and VPA might be a comprehensive result of multiple factors. On the basis of our simulation, interval medication of MEPM injection and VPA immediate release tablet at 4-6 h timed interval was recommended, or intravenous administration of VPA solution was preferred when combination regimen was necessary in a clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16350\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
PBPK modelling for the evaluation of drug-drug interaction between meropenem and valproic acid.
Aims: The present study aimed to quantitatively investigate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) mechanism between meropenem (MEPM) and valproic acid (VPA).
Methods: In the present study, we firstly developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MEPM and VPA. The verified PBPK model was then used to quantitatively investigate the potential DDI between MEPM and VPA. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of acylpeptide hydrolase (APEH) on DDI was also evaluated.
Results: In our simulation, the plasma concentration of hydrolysate of VPAG decreased to 63% when combined with MEPM. Total plasma concentration of VPA before carbapenem use was 53.61 mg/L, whereas it was 45.42 mg/L during carbapenem use. The inhibition of hydrolysis of VPAG by MEPM alone could not result in a rapid and substantial decrease in the plasma concentration of VPA. Parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the changes of absorption played an important role in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of VPA, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was more susceptible to elimination changes. In addition, a decrease in APEH activity had little impact on the plasma pharmacokinetics of VPA.
Conclusions: The DDI between MEPM and VPA might be a comprehensive result of multiple factors. On the basis of our simulation, interval medication of MEPM injection and VPA immediate release tablet at 4-6 h timed interval was recommended, or intravenous administration of VPA solution was preferred when combination regimen was necessary in a clinical setting.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.