结合中国贸易结构优化,揭示中国与主要区域经济体之间的碳排放体现网络

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Feng Xu, Ruijie Suo, Nan Xiang, Jianghong Feng, Chang Shu
{"title":"结合中国贸易结构优化,揭示中国与主要区域经济体之间的碳排放体现网络","authors":"Feng Xu,&nbsp;Ruijie Suo,&nbsp;Nan Xiang,&nbsp;Jianghong Feng,&nbsp;Chang Shu","doi":"10.1007/s41685-024-00354-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon emissions embodied in trade account for 23% of total global emissions. This phenomenon will exacerbate as global trade flourishes, impeding carbon reduction. To clarify the evolutionary characteristics of global embodied carbon network, we constructed a multiregional input–output model spanning 2001 to 2021, encompassing China (CHN), the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the European Union (EU), and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which represent 76% of global GDP. Combining industry correlation analysis and scenario simulation, we further explored embodied carbon emissions (ECE) mitigation potential through trade restructuring and carbon emissions intensity reducing in China. Results revealed an 89% increase in global ECE over the past two decades, with 70% contributed by intermediate trade. China emerged as the only country with net carbon inflow, but it experienced a significant decrease in net inflow in 2021 (32% lower than the peak in 2011). Conversely, the other three economic entities exhibited net carbon outflow in aggregate terms. Notably, RCEP (except CHN) experienced a transition in the direction of carbon flows in final trade, shifting from accounting for 10% of net global carbon outflows to 11% of inflows. In addition, dual control of emission intensity and trade scale, particularly in manufacturing industries, can reduce net inflows to China by up to 19% and contribute a 3.42% decrease in global ECE. Promoting trade to final products and transforming key industries to low-carbon, high value-added sectors were vital for carbon mitigation. These results can facilitate policy-making in shaping green and low-carbon foreign trade patterns.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":36164,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","volume":"8 4","pages":"971 - 992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering embodied carbon emissions network between China and major regional economies with consideration of China’s trade structure optimization\",\"authors\":\"Feng Xu,&nbsp;Ruijie Suo,&nbsp;Nan Xiang,&nbsp;Jianghong Feng,&nbsp;Chang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41685-024-00354-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon emissions embodied in trade account for 23% of total global emissions. This phenomenon will exacerbate as global trade flourishes, impeding carbon reduction. To clarify the evolutionary characteristics of global embodied carbon network, we constructed a multiregional input–output model spanning 2001 to 2021, encompassing China (CHN), the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the European Union (EU), and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which represent 76% of global GDP. Combining industry correlation analysis and scenario simulation, we further explored embodied carbon emissions (ECE) mitigation potential through trade restructuring and carbon emissions intensity reducing in China. Results revealed an 89% increase in global ECE over the past two decades, with 70% contributed by intermediate trade. China emerged as the only country with net carbon inflow, but it experienced a significant decrease in net inflow in 2021 (32% lower than the peak in 2011). Conversely, the other three economic entities exhibited net carbon outflow in aggregate terms. Notably, RCEP (except CHN) experienced a transition in the direction of carbon flows in final trade, shifting from accounting for 10% of net global carbon outflows to 11% of inflows. In addition, dual control of emission intensity and trade scale, particularly in manufacturing industries, can reduce net inflows to China by up to 19% and contribute a 3.42% decrease in global ECE. Promoting trade to final products and transforming key industries to low-carbon, high value-added sectors were vital for carbon mitigation. These results can facilitate policy-making in shaping green and low-carbon foreign trade patterns.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"971 - 992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-024-00354-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-024-00354-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贸易所体现的碳排放量占全球总排放量的 23%。随着全球贸易的蓬勃发展,这一现象将愈演愈烈,阻碍碳减排。为了阐明全球内含碳网络的演变特征,我们构建了一个跨区域投入产出模型,时间跨度为 2001 年至 2021 年,涵盖了中国、区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP)、欧盟(EU)和美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定(USMCA),这些国家的 GDP 占全球的 76%。结合行业相关性分析和情景模拟,我们进一步探讨了中国通过贸易结构调整和降低碳排放强度来减少体现碳排放(ECE)的潜力。结果显示,在过去二十年中,全球 ECE 增长了 89%,其中 70% 来自中间贸易。中国是唯一的碳净流入国,但 2021 年净流入量大幅下降(比 2011 年的峰值下降 32%)。相反,其他三个经济实体的碳排放总量均为净流出。值得注意的是,RCEP(中国除外)在最终贸易中经历了碳流动方向的转变,从占全球碳净流出量的 10%转变为占流入量的 11%。此外,排放强度和贸易规模的双重控制,尤其是在制造业,可使中国的净流入量减少高达 19%,并使全球 ECE 减少 3.42%。促进最终产品贸易和将关键产业转型为低碳、高附加值行业对于碳减排至关重要。这些结果有助于制定政策,塑造绿色低碳的对外贸易模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering embodied carbon emissions network between China and major regional economies with consideration of China’s trade structure optimization

Carbon emissions embodied in trade account for 23% of total global emissions. This phenomenon will exacerbate as global trade flourishes, impeding carbon reduction. To clarify the evolutionary characteristics of global embodied carbon network, we constructed a multiregional input–output model spanning 2001 to 2021, encompassing China (CHN), the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the European Union (EU), and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which represent 76% of global GDP. Combining industry correlation analysis and scenario simulation, we further explored embodied carbon emissions (ECE) mitigation potential through trade restructuring and carbon emissions intensity reducing in China. Results revealed an 89% increase in global ECE over the past two decades, with 70% contributed by intermediate trade. China emerged as the only country with net carbon inflow, but it experienced a significant decrease in net inflow in 2021 (32% lower than the peak in 2011). Conversely, the other three economic entities exhibited net carbon outflow in aggregate terms. Notably, RCEP (except CHN) experienced a transition in the direction of carbon flows in final trade, shifting from accounting for 10% of net global carbon outflows to 11% of inflows. In addition, dual control of emission intensity and trade scale, particularly in manufacturing industries, can reduce net inflows to China by up to 19% and contribute a 3.42% decrease in global ECE. Promoting trade to final products and transforming key industries to low-carbon, high value-added sectors were vital for carbon mitigation. These results can facilitate policy-making in shaping green and low-carbon foreign trade patterns.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science expands the frontiers of regional science through the diffusion of intrinsically developed and advanced modern, regional science methodologies throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Articles published in the journal foster progress and development of regional science through the promotion of comprehensive and interdisciplinary academic studies in relationship to research in regional science across the globe. The journal’s scope includes articles dedicated to theoretical economics, positive economics including econometrics and statistical analysis and input–output analysis, CGE, Simulation, applied economics including international economics, regional economics, industrial organization, analysis of governance and institutional issues, law and economics, migration and labor markets, spatial economics, land economics, urban economics, agricultural economics, environmental economics, behavioral economics and spatial analysis with GIS/RS data education economics, sociology including urban sociology, rural sociology, environmental sociology and educational sociology, as well as traffic engineering. The journal provides a unique platform for its research community to further develop, analyze, and resolve urgent regional and urban issues in Asia, and to further refine established research around the world in this multidisciplinary field. The journal invites original articles, proposals, and book reviews.The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a new English-language journal that spun out of Chiikigakukenkyuu, which has a 45-year history of publishing the best Japanese research in regional science in the Japanese language and, more recently and more frequently, in English. The development of regional science as an international discipline has necessitated the need for a new publication in English. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a publishing vehicle for English-language contributions to the field in Japan, across the complete Asia-Pacific arena, and beyond.Content published in this journal is peer reviewed (Double Blind).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信