在基于实践的研究网络中将德国国家用药计划用于临床研究。

Patrick Schmutz, Arthur Krauss, Sven Dörflinger, Arndt Becker, Andreas Polanc, Claudia Salm, Frank Peters-Klimm, Gudrun Hübner, Christian Erhardt, Christian Thies
{"title":"在基于实践的研究网络中将德国国家用药计划用于临床研究。","authors":"Patrick Schmutz, Arthur Krauss, Sven Dörflinger, Arndt Becker, Andreas Polanc, Claudia Salm, Frank Peters-Klimm, Gudrun Hübner, Christian Erhardt, Christian Thies","doi":"10.3233/SHTI241082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The German National Medication Plan (GNMP) can be a valuable and interoperable data source for clinical studies, due to its digital specification and mandatory provisioning for chronically ill patients. Digital transfer of a patients current GNMP from the Patient Data Management System (PDMS) into electronic case report forms would avoid error prone manual data capturing. It is also essential for studies in practice-based research networks (PBRN), where data capturing must have as little impact as possible on everyday practice. The following issues are currently preventing seamless digital integration: There is no standardized interoperable export of the GNMP from PDMS. In the current form, pharmaceutical catalogs are needed to decode the contained pharmaceutical registration numbers. As accessibility to the pharmaceutical catalogs is restricted, there is no generic access to the actual information needed for study data evaluation. In order to conduct studies, feasible workarounds for these issues had to be implemented in the standard operating procedures, tools and participating GP practices. To overcome the GNMP's current lack of digital interoperability, the proposed solution combines semi-automated data export from PDMS at the GP practice and manual database search at the study center with a semi-automated processing pipeline to balance workload between GP practices, study management and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"321 ","pages":"150-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the German National Medication Plan for Clinical Studies in Practice-Based Research Networks.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Schmutz, Arthur Krauss, Sven Dörflinger, Arndt Becker, Andreas Polanc, Claudia Salm, Frank Peters-Klimm, Gudrun Hübner, Christian Erhardt, Christian Thies\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI241082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The German National Medication Plan (GNMP) can be a valuable and interoperable data source for clinical studies, due to its digital specification and mandatory provisioning for chronically ill patients. Digital transfer of a patients current GNMP from the Patient Data Management System (PDMS) into electronic case report forms would avoid error prone manual data capturing. It is also essential for studies in practice-based research networks (PBRN), where data capturing must have as little impact as possible on everyday practice. The following issues are currently preventing seamless digital integration: There is no standardized interoperable export of the GNMP from PDMS. In the current form, pharmaceutical catalogs are needed to decode the contained pharmaceutical registration numbers. As accessibility to the pharmaceutical catalogs is restricted, there is no generic access to the actual information needed for study data evaluation. In order to conduct studies, feasible workarounds for these issues had to be implemented in the standard operating procedures, tools and participating GP practices. To overcome the GNMP's current lack of digital interoperability, the proposed solution combines semi-automated data export from PDMS at the GP practice and manual database search at the study center with a semi-automated processing pipeline to balance workload between GP practices, study management and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"volume\":\"321 \",\"pages\":\"150-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in health technology and informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI241082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国国家用药计划(GNMP)因其数字化规范和对慢性病患者的强制规定,可以成为临床研究的一个有价值且可互操作的数据源。将患者当前的 GNMP 从患者数据管理系统(PDMS)数字化传输到电子病例报告表中,可以避免容易出错的人工数据采集。这对于以实践为基础的研究网络(PBRN)中的研究也至关重要,因为数据采集必须尽可能不影响日常实践。目前,以下问题阻碍了无缝数字整合:没有从 PDMS 导出可互操作的标准化 GNMP。在目前的形式下,需要药品目录来解码所包含的药品注册号。由于药品目录的访问受到限制,因此无法通用访问研究数据评估所需的实际信息。为了开展研究,必须在标准操作程序、工具和参与的全科医生实践中实施可行的变通办法来解决这些问题。为了克服 GNMP 目前缺乏数字互操作性的问题,所提出的解决方案将全科医生诊室从 PDMS 系统半自动导出数据和研究中心手动搜索数据库与半自动处理流水线相结合,以平衡全科医生诊室、研究管理和评估之间的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the German National Medication Plan for Clinical Studies in Practice-Based Research Networks.

The German National Medication Plan (GNMP) can be a valuable and interoperable data source for clinical studies, due to its digital specification and mandatory provisioning for chronically ill patients. Digital transfer of a patients current GNMP from the Patient Data Management System (PDMS) into electronic case report forms would avoid error prone manual data capturing. It is also essential for studies in practice-based research networks (PBRN), where data capturing must have as little impact as possible on everyday practice. The following issues are currently preventing seamless digital integration: There is no standardized interoperable export of the GNMP from PDMS. In the current form, pharmaceutical catalogs are needed to decode the contained pharmaceutical registration numbers. As accessibility to the pharmaceutical catalogs is restricted, there is no generic access to the actual information needed for study data evaluation. In order to conduct studies, feasible workarounds for these issues had to be implemented in the standard operating procedures, tools and participating GP practices. To overcome the GNMP's current lack of digital interoperability, the proposed solution combines semi-automated data export from PDMS at the GP practice and manual database search at the study center with a semi-automated processing pipeline to balance workload between GP practices, study management and evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信