驾驭过渡冲击:系统思维在提高早期职业护士护理流程能力方面的作用。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1111/wvn.12757
Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Samira Ahmed Alsenany, Heba Abdel-Hamid Hammad, Nadia Waheed Elzohairy, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal
{"title":"驾驭过渡冲击:系统思维在提高早期职业护士护理流程能力方面的作用。","authors":"Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Samira Ahmed Alsenany, Heba Abdel-Hamid Hammad, Nadia Waheed Elzohairy, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Building nursing process competency among beginner nurses is a pivotal need in contemporary, complex, fast-paced nursing practice. However, transitioning from the educational phase to practicing as a nurse can be a significant adjustment. New practitioners often experience a period of shock, which may present challenges in developing nurse competency. Fostering system thinking among those nurses could buffer the negative signs of transition shock and cultivate nursing process competencies at earlier times.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explores the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early career nurses and investigates the moderating effect of system thinking on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional correlational exploratory study was conducted at four large hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected from 393 nurses from the first of February 2024 to the end of April 2024 using the transition shock scale, the competency of nursing process questionnaire, and the system thinking scale. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the study variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant negative correlation exists between transition shock, nursing process competency, and system thinking among early-career nurses. System thinking is positively associated with nursing process competency. System thinking positively moderates the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early-career nurses. Transition shock and system thinking account for 23.9% of the variance in nursing process competency among early-career nurses.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Transition shock is an inevitable phenomenon among early-career nurses, negatively affecting their competency in the nursing process. System thinking buffers this adverse effect and significantly augments nursing process competency among this set of nurses. Predicting and mitigating transition shock among early-career nurses is pivotal in building nursing process competency. Nurse educators must develop curricula that cultivate system thinking skills among nursing students, which enables them to buffer transition shock after graduation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"611-625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating transition shock: The role of system thinking in enhancing nursing process competency among early career nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Hussein Ramadan Atta, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Samira Ahmed Alsenany, Heba Abdel-Hamid Hammad, Nadia Waheed Elzohairy, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wvn.12757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Building nursing process competency among beginner nurses is a pivotal need in contemporary, complex, fast-paced nursing practice. However, transitioning from the educational phase to practicing as a nurse can be a significant adjustment. New practitioners often experience a period of shock, which may present challenges in developing nurse competency. Fostering system thinking among those nurses could buffer the negative signs of transition shock and cultivate nursing process competencies at earlier times.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explores the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early career nurses and investigates the moderating effect of system thinking on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional correlational exploratory study was conducted at four large hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected from 393 nurses from the first of February 2024 to the end of April 2024 using the transition shock scale, the competency of nursing process questionnaire, and the system thinking scale. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the study variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant negative correlation exists between transition shock, nursing process competency, and system thinking among early-career nurses. System thinking is positively associated with nursing process competency. System thinking positively moderates the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early-career nurses. Transition shock and system thinking account for 23.9% of the variance in nursing process competency among early-career nurses.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Transition shock is an inevitable phenomenon among early-career nurses, negatively affecting their competency in the nursing process. System thinking buffers this adverse effect and significantly augments nursing process competency among this set of nurses. Predicting and mitigating transition shock among early-career nurses is pivotal in building nursing process competency. Nurse educators must develop curricula that cultivate system thinking skills among nursing students, which enables them to buffer transition shock after graduation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"611-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12757\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在当代复杂、快节奏的护理实践中,培养初学护士的护理流程能力是一项关键需求。然而,从教育阶段过渡到护士执业阶段可能是一个重大的调整过程。新从业人员往往会经历一段休克期,这可能会给护士能力的培养带来挑战。目的:本研究探讨了职业生涯初期护士的过渡冲击与护理流程能力之间的关系,并研究了系统思维对这种关系的调节作用:这项横断面相关探索性研究在埃及的四家大型医院进行。从 2024 年 2 月 1 日至 2024 年 4 月底,使用过渡冲击量表、护理流程能力问卷和系统思维量表收集了 393 名护士的数据。采用相关分析和分层回归分析来检验研究变量:结果:在统计意义上,早期职业护士的过渡冲击、护理流程能力和系统思维之间存在负相关。系统思维与护理流程能力呈正相关。系统思维对早期职业护士的过渡冲击和护理流程能力之间的关系起到积极的调节作用。过渡冲击和系统思维占早期职业护士护理流程能力差异的 23.9%:过渡冲击是初入职场的护士不可避免的现象,会对其护理流程能力产生负面影响。系统思维可以缓冲这种不利影响,并显著提高这类护士的护理流程能力。预测和减轻初入职场护士的转型冲击是培养护理流程能力的关键。护士教育者必须开发培养护生系统思维能力的课程,使他们能够在毕业后缓冲转型冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating transition shock: The role of system thinking in enhancing nursing process competency among early career nurses.

Background: Building nursing process competency among beginner nurses is a pivotal need in contemporary, complex, fast-paced nursing practice. However, transitioning from the educational phase to practicing as a nurse can be a significant adjustment. New practitioners often experience a period of shock, which may present challenges in developing nurse competency. Fostering system thinking among those nurses could buffer the negative signs of transition shock and cultivate nursing process competencies at earlier times.

Aim: This study explores the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early career nurses and investigates the moderating effect of system thinking on this relationship.

Method: This cross-sectional correlational exploratory study was conducted at four large hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected from 393 nurses from the first of February 2024 to the end of April 2024 using the transition shock scale, the competency of nursing process questionnaire, and the system thinking scale. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the study variables.

Results: A statistically significant negative correlation exists between transition shock, nursing process competency, and system thinking among early-career nurses. System thinking is positively associated with nursing process competency. System thinking positively moderates the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early-career nurses. Transition shock and system thinking account for 23.9% of the variance in nursing process competency among early-career nurses.

Linking evidence to action: Transition shock is an inevitable phenomenon among early-career nurses, negatively affecting their competency in the nursing process. System thinking buffers this adverse effect and significantly augments nursing process competency among this set of nurses. Predicting and mitigating transition shock among early-career nurses is pivotal in building nursing process competency. Nurse educators must develop curricula that cultivate system thinking skills among nursing students, which enables them to buffer transition shock after graduation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信