[弥合 "知与行 "之间的差距:复杂家庭干预的实施方法]。

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Saskia Oesch, Torsten Schwalbach, Lotte Verweij, Myrta Kohler, Simone Sutter, Marco Riguzzi, Rahel Naef
{"title":"[弥合 \"知与行 \"之间的差距:复杂家庭干预的实施方法]。","authors":"Saskia Oesch, Torsten Schwalbach, Lotte Verweij, Myrta Kohler, Simone Sutter, Marco Riguzzi, Rahel Naef","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of complex family interventions poses a challenge since they consist of various interacting components which affect multiple players and often require changes in behaviour and work processes. Implementation success is strongly influenced by environmental factors. The comprehensive implementation of complex interventions therefore needs a deliberate and systematic implementation process, including its evaluation. Implementation science offers a variety of theories and methods to support the integration and evaluation of complex family health interventions in real-world settings, requiring a broad spectrum of knowledge and skills for clinicians and researchers alike. Hence, specific examples may be relevant to both clinicians and researchers who wish to systematically address know-do gaps in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to describe and illustrate how complex family interventions can be systematically designed, evaluated and implemented using implementation science frameworks and methods by drawing on two research projects - namely the Family Support in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) and Bereavement Support for Families (B4F).</p><p><strong>Methodical steps to implementation: </strong>Five steps were used to implement and evaluate the interventions across both research projects: 1) engaging key persons and families, 2) identifying gaps in care and developing/adapting the intervention, 3) understanding the implementation context, 4) tailoring implementation approaches, and 5) evaluating implementation progress and success.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The five illustrated steps allow for a theory-guided but nevertheless pragmatic approach in the implementation of complex family interventions. This approach may serve as a guide to integrate complex interventions and evidence-based practices into routine care and to close know-do gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Bridging the know-do gap: Implementation approaches to complex family interventions].\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Oesch, Torsten Schwalbach, Lotte Verweij, Myrta Kohler, Simone Sutter, Marco Riguzzi, Rahel Naef\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of complex family interventions poses a challenge since they consist of various interacting components which affect multiple players and often require changes in behaviour and work processes. Implementation success is strongly influenced by environmental factors. The comprehensive implementation of complex interventions therefore needs a deliberate and systematic implementation process, including its evaluation. Implementation science offers a variety of theories and methods to support the integration and evaluation of complex family health interventions in real-world settings, requiring a broad spectrum of knowledge and skills for clinicians and researchers alike. Hence, specific examples may be relevant to both clinicians and researchers who wish to systematically address know-do gaps in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to describe and illustrate how complex family interventions can be systematically designed, evaluated and implemented using implementation science frameworks and methods by drawing on two research projects - namely the Family Support in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) and Bereavement Support for Families (B4F).</p><p><strong>Methodical steps to implementation: </strong>Five steps were used to implement and evaluate the interventions across both research projects: 1) engaging key persons and families, 2) identifying gaps in care and developing/adapting the intervention, 3) understanding the implementation context, 4) tailoring implementation approaches, and 5) evaluating implementation progress and success.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The five illustrated steps allow for a theory-guided but nevertheless pragmatic approach in the implementation of complex family interventions. This approach may serve as a guide to integrate complex interventions and evidence-based practices into routine care and to close know-do gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采取复杂的家庭干预措施是一项挑战,因为这些措施由各种相互影响的部分组成,影响到多个参与者,而且往往需要改变行为和工作流程。实施成功与否受环境因素的影响很大。因此,复杂干预措施的全面实施需要一个深思熟虑和系统的实施过程,包括对其进行评估。实施科学提供了各种理论和方法,以支持在现实环境中整合和评估复杂的家庭健康干预措施,这需要临床医生和研究人员具备广泛的知识和技能。因此,具体实例可能对希望系统解决临床实践中知行差距的临床医生和研究人员都有意义。目的:旨在通过两个研究项目--即重症监护病房家庭支持(FICUS)和家庭丧亲支持(B4F)--来描述和说明如何利用实施科学框架和方法系统地设计、评估和实施复杂的家庭干预措施:在这两个研究项目中,我们采用了五个步骤来实施和评估干预措施:1) 吸引关键人员和家庭参与;2) 确定护理差距并开发/调整干预措施;3) 了解实施背景;4) 量身定制实施方法;5) 评估实施进展和成功:所说明的五个步骤为复杂家庭干预措施的实施提供了一种理论指导但又务实的方法。这种方法可作为将复杂干预措施和循证实践纳入常规护理的指南,并缩小 "知行 "差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Bridging the know-do gap: Implementation approaches to complex family interventions].

Background: The introduction of complex family interventions poses a challenge since they consist of various interacting components which affect multiple players and often require changes in behaviour and work processes. Implementation success is strongly influenced by environmental factors. The comprehensive implementation of complex interventions therefore needs a deliberate and systematic implementation process, including its evaluation. Implementation science offers a variety of theories and methods to support the integration and evaluation of complex family health interventions in real-world settings, requiring a broad spectrum of knowledge and skills for clinicians and researchers alike. Hence, specific examples may be relevant to both clinicians and researchers who wish to systematically address know-do gaps in clinical practice.

Aim: The aim is to describe and illustrate how complex family interventions can be systematically designed, evaluated and implemented using implementation science frameworks and methods by drawing on two research projects - namely the Family Support in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) and Bereavement Support for Families (B4F).

Methodical steps to implementation: Five steps were used to implement and evaluate the interventions across both research projects: 1) engaging key persons and families, 2) identifying gaps in care and developing/adapting the intervention, 3) understanding the implementation context, 4) tailoring implementation approaches, and 5) evaluating implementation progress and success.

Discussion and conclusion: The five illustrated steps allow for a theory-guided but nevertheless pragmatic approach in the implementation of complex family interventions. This approach may serve as a guide to integrate complex interventions and evidence-based practices into routine care and to close know-do gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信