多站点实施性健康调查和临床决策支持,促进青少年性传播感染筛查。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Sarah Kathleen Schmidt, Judith Dexheimer, Joe Zorc, Chella Palmer, Theron Charles Casper, Kristin Stukus, Michelle Pickett, Cynthia Mollen, Cara Elsholz, Andrea T Cruz, Erin Augustine, Monika Goyal, Jennifer L Reed
{"title":"多站点实施性健康调查和临床决策支持,促进青少年性传播感染筛查。","authors":"Sarah Kathleen Schmidt, Judith Dexheimer, Joe Zorc, Chella Palmer, Theron Charles Casper, Kristin Stukus, Michelle Pickett, Cynthia Mollen, Cara Elsholz, Andrea T Cruz, Erin Augustine, Monika Goyal, Jennifer L Reed","doi":"10.1055/a-2480-4628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR) -embedded CDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 - September 25, 2022 out of 79,780 eligible adolescents. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at-risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7% - 97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledge selections of \"other\" and \"[testing] already ordered\" were the most frequent indications STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise combined with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Kathleen Schmidt, Judith Dexheimer, Joe Zorc, Chella Palmer, Theron Charles Casper, Kristin Stukus, Michelle Pickett, Cynthia Mollen, Cara Elsholz, Andrea T Cruz, Erin Augustine, Monika Goyal, Jennifer L Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2480-4628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR) -embedded CDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 - September 25, 2022 out of 79,780 eligible adolescents. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at-risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7% - 97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledge selections of \\\"other\\\" and \\\"[testing] already ordered\\\" were the most frequent indications STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise combined with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2480-4628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2480-4628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青少年是性传播感染(STI)的高风险人群,经常到急诊科(ED)就诊。利用患者报告的保密结果进行性传播感染筛查是电子筛查方法的理想应用:本研究的目的是在六家地理位置分散的儿科急诊室实施一项面向患者的保密电子调查,以评估青少年感染性传播疾病的风险并同意进行检测,同时整合面向提供者的电子临床决策支持(CDS),并根据调查和 CDS 使用指标对实施情况进行评估:方法:一个试点机构为六个急诊室提供了电子调查、数据查询和 CDS 模板的代码。各机构确定了必要的信息技术(IT)人员,完成了本地构建,并根据各机构工作流程的不同进行了修改,所有机构都成功部署了电子调查和嵌入电子健康记录(EHR)的 CDS:在 2021 年 4 月 12 日至 2022 年 9 月 25 日期间,79,780 名符合条件的青少年中有 6,165 人完成了保密健康调查。在所有六个站点中,CDS 被触发 2,058 次,表明患者面临风险或同意接受性传播感染检测。医疗服务提供者确认 CDS 的平均比例为 81.6%(范围为 45.7% - 97.6%)。每次确认 CDS 的医疗服务提供者人数中位数为 2.0。通过 CDS 下达性传播感染检测指令的比例平均为 47.3%。CDS 确认选择 "其他 "和"[检测] 已订购 "是 CDS 未订购 STI 检测的最常见原因:结论:在多个医疗机构成功部署面向患者的筛查仪和集成电子 CDS 是可行的。将不同类型的信息技术和信息学专业知识与当地的临床工作流程知识相结合是成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening.

Background: Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.

Methods: A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR) -embedded CDS.

Results: 6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 - September 25, 2022 out of 79,780 eligible adolescents. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at-risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7% - 97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledge selections of "other" and "[testing] already ordered" were the most frequent indications STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.

Conclusions: Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise combined with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信