通过一项务实的双臂随机比较效果试验,评估送餐服务对居家老年人留在社区的能力的影响:Deliver-EE 试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3
Kali S Thomas, Kimberly P Bernard, Melissa Clark, Laura Dionne, Alison Fisher, Emily Gadbois, Jill Harrison, Lisa Juckett, Julie Locher, Patricia Risica, Tamara Sequeira, Lucy Theilheimer, Roee Gutman
{"title":"通过一项务实的双臂随机比较效果试验,评估送餐服务对居家老年人留在社区的能力的影响:Deliver-EE 试验的研究方案。","authors":"Kali S Thomas, Kimberly P Bernard, Melissa Clark, Laura Dionne, Alison Fisher, Emily Gadbois, Jill Harrison, Lisa Juckett, Julie Locher, Patricia Risica, Tamara Sequeira, Lucy Theilheimer, Roee Gutman","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As food insecurity and healthcare costs are linked, healthcare entities (i.e., providers, healthcare systems, insurers) are increasingly interested in identifying and providing solutions to address food insecurity among their patients. Home-delivered meals are one long-standing solution to address food insecurity among homebound older adults. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of people's preferences for how meals are delivered to them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With extensive stakeholder input, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study in which we will enroll 2300 older adults on waiting lists at home-delivered meals programs across the country and randomize them to receive for 6 months, either (1) weekday lunchtime meals delivered by a local volunteer or driver who also provides socialization and wellness checks or (2) biweekly delivery of 10 frozen meals to participants' homes. Participant data will be combined with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data to calculate post-randomization institutional vs. community days. Baseline and 3-month surveys will evaluate secondary outcomes (e.g., food insecurity, loneliness, quality of life) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., nutritional risk). To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, we will test for interactions between the two types of meal delivery and participants' preferred mode of meal delivery as well as participants' living arrangements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options. The knowledge generated from this research will be of value to healthcare providers, health systems, payers, community-based organizations, older adults, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets homebound older adults' needs and promotes community independence. In addition, the experience of working closely with stakeholders in designing and conducting this trial will be useful to researchers seeking to engage with stakeholders in the development and evaluation of complex social service interventions while balancing regulatory, resource, and human subjects research considerations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov.  NCT05357261 . Registered on May 02, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kali S Thomas, Kimberly P Bernard, Melissa Clark, Laura Dionne, Alison Fisher, Emily Gadbois, Jill Harrison, Lisa Juckett, Julie Locher, Patricia Risica, Tamara Sequeira, Lucy Theilheimer, Roee Gutman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As food insecurity and healthcare costs are linked, healthcare entities (i.e., providers, healthcare systems, insurers) are increasingly interested in identifying and providing solutions to address food insecurity among their patients. Home-delivered meals are one long-standing solution to address food insecurity among homebound older adults. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of people's preferences for how meals are delivered to them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With extensive stakeholder input, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study in which we will enroll 2300 older adults on waiting lists at home-delivered meals programs across the country and randomize them to receive for 6 months, either (1) weekday lunchtime meals delivered by a local volunteer or driver who also provides socialization and wellness checks or (2) biweekly delivery of 10 frozen meals to participants' homes. Participant data will be combined with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data to calculate post-randomization institutional vs. community days. Baseline and 3-month surveys will evaluate secondary outcomes (e.g., food insecurity, loneliness, quality of life) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., nutritional risk). To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, we will test for interactions between the two types of meal delivery and participants' preferred mode of meal delivery as well as participants' living arrangements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options. The knowledge generated from this research will be of value to healthcare providers, health systems, payers, community-based organizations, older adults, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets homebound older adults' needs and promotes community independence. In addition, the experience of working closely with stakeholders in designing and conducting this trial will be useful to researchers seeking to engage with stakeholders in the development and evaluation of complex social service interventions while balancing regulatory, resource, and human subjects research considerations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov.  NCT05357261 . Registered on May 02, 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08635-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于食物不安全与医疗成本相关联,医疗保健实体(即医疗服务提供者、医疗保健系统、保险公司)越来越有兴趣确定并提供解决方案,以解决患者的食物不安全问题。家庭送餐是解决居家老年人食物不安全问题的一个长期解决方案。然而,关于哪种送餐方式在促进社区独立、减少医疗保健使用和提高生活质量方面最为有效,以及这些结果如何随着人们对送餐方式的偏好而变化,目前的证据还很有限:在广泛征求利益相关者意见的基础上,我们设计并实施了一项务实的随机比较效益研究,在这项研究中,我们将在全国范围内招募 2300 名在家送餐计划候补名单上的老年人,并随机安排他们在 6 个月内接受以下两种送餐方式:(1)由当地志愿者或司机在工作日午餐时间送餐,同时提供社交活动和健康检查;或(2)每两周送 10 份冷冻餐到参与者家中。参与者的数据将与美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的数据相结合,以计算随机化后的住院日与社区日。基线调查和 3 个月调查将评估次要结果(如食物不安全、孤独感、生活质量)和探索性结果(如营养风险)。为了检验治疗效果的异质性,我们将检验两种送餐方式与参与者首选的送餐方式以及参与者的生活安排之间的交互作用:这项研究将首次对两种主要送餐方式的比较效果进行前瞻性评估。这项研究产生的知识将对医疗服务提供者、医疗系统、付款人、社区组织、老年人及其家人具有重要价值,因为它将确定最能满足居家老年人需求和促进社区独立性的送餐模式。此外,在设计和开展这项试验时与利益相关者密切合作的经验,对于寻求与利益相关者合作开发和评估复杂的社会服务干预措施,同时兼顾监管、资源和人体研究等方面考虑的研究人员也很有帮助:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05357261 。注册日期:2022 年 5 月 2 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial.

Background: As food insecurity and healthcare costs are linked, healthcare entities (i.e., providers, healthcare systems, insurers) are increasingly interested in identifying and providing solutions to address food insecurity among their patients. Home-delivered meals are one long-standing solution to address food insecurity among homebound older adults. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of people's preferences for how meals are delivered to them.

Methods: With extensive stakeholder input, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study in which we will enroll 2300 older adults on waiting lists at home-delivered meals programs across the country and randomize them to receive for 6 months, either (1) weekday lunchtime meals delivered by a local volunteer or driver who also provides socialization and wellness checks or (2) biweekly delivery of 10 frozen meals to participants' homes. Participant data will be combined with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data to calculate post-randomization institutional vs. community days. Baseline and 3-month surveys will evaluate secondary outcomes (e.g., food insecurity, loneliness, quality of life) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., nutritional risk). To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, we will test for interactions between the two types of meal delivery and participants' preferred mode of meal delivery as well as participants' living arrangements.

Discussion: This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options. The knowledge generated from this research will be of value to healthcare providers, health systems, payers, community-based organizations, older adults, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets homebound older adults' needs and promotes community independence. In addition, the experience of working closely with stakeholders in designing and conducting this trial will be useful to researchers seeking to engage with stakeholders in the development and evaluation of complex social service interventions while balancing regulatory, resource, and human subjects research considerations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov.  NCT05357261 . Registered on May 02, 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信