亚甲蓝治疗脓毒性休克:随机和前瞻性观察研究的系统回顾和元分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Afrah Alkazemi, Sayed Abdulmotaleb Almoosawy, Anwar Murad, Abdulrahman Alfares
{"title":"亚甲蓝治疗脓毒性休克:随机和前瞻性观察研究的系统回顾和元分析。","authors":"Afrah Alkazemi, Sayed Abdulmotaleb Almoosawy, Anwar Murad, Abdulrahman Alfares","doi":"10.1177/08850666241300312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of methylene blue (MB) on critical patient outcomes, including overall mortality, hemodynamic stability, and organ function has been inconsistently described across studies. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of MB therapy in adult patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2024 included randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies involving adult septic shock patients who received intravenous MB therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes on hemodynamics and ICU length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies (5 randomized, 10 non-randomized) involving a total of 441 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant reduction in mortality rates among septic shock patients treated with MB (mortality rate 0.52; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.66; <i>P</i> < .001). In a sub-analysis of only randomized trials, the results remained statistically significant (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; <i>P</i> = .023). A significant increase in mean arterial pressure post-infusion was observed in three studies. Two studies showed no substantial difference in heart rate and two studies showed no difference in cardiac index following MB administration. Only one study showed a reduction in the length of ICU stay with MB use, while another observed a decrease in overall hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review and meta-analysis suggest that MB may be associated with a significant reduction in mortality in septic shock patients though findings are limited by sample size and heterogeneity. Further robust studies are needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241300312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methylene Blue for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized and Prospective Observational Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Afrah Alkazemi, Sayed Abdulmotaleb Almoosawy, Anwar Murad, Abdulrahman Alfares\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241300312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of methylene blue (MB) on critical patient outcomes, including overall mortality, hemodynamic stability, and organ function has been inconsistently described across studies. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of MB therapy in adult patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2024 included randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies involving adult septic shock patients who received intravenous MB therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes on hemodynamics and ICU length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies (5 randomized, 10 non-randomized) involving a total of 441 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant reduction in mortality rates among septic shock patients treated with MB (mortality rate 0.52; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.66; <i>P</i> < .001). In a sub-analysis of only randomized trials, the results remained statistically significant (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; <i>P</i> = .023). A significant increase in mean arterial pressure post-infusion was observed in three studies. Two studies showed no substantial difference in heart rate and two studies showed no difference in cardiac index following MB administration. Only one study showed a reduction in the length of ICU stay with MB use, while another observed a decrease in overall hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review and meta-analysis suggest that MB may be associated with a significant reduction in mortality in septic shock patients though findings are limited by sample size and heterogeneity. Further robust studies are needed to validate these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8850666241300312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241300312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241300312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亚甲蓝(MB)对危重病人预后的影响,包括总死亡率、血液动力学稳定性和器官功能,在不同研究中的描述并不一致。本研究旨在评估亚甲蓝疗法对重症监护室(ICU)中脓毒性休克成人患者的疗效:截至 2024 年 2 月,在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行的系统性检索包括随机对照试验和前瞻性观察研究,涉及接受静脉甲基溴治疗的成人脓毒性休克患者。主要结果为全因死亡率,次要结果为血液动力学和重症监护室住院时间:符合纳入标准的研究有 15 项(5 项随机研究,10 项非随机研究),共涉及 441 名患者。荟萃分析表明,接受甲基溴治疗的脓毒性休克患者的死亡率在统计学上显著降低(死亡率为 0.52;95% CI 为 0.38 至 0.66;P P = .023)。三项研究观察到输液后平均动脉压明显升高。两项研究显示,注射甲基溴后,心率无明显差异,两项研究显示,心脏指数无差异。只有一项研究显示使用甲基溴缩短了重症监护室的住院时间,而另一项研究则观察到总体住院时间有所缩短:综述和荟萃分析表明,甲基溴可能与显著降低脓毒性休克患者的死亡率有关,但研究结果受到样本量和异质性的限制。要验证这些结果,还需要进一步的可靠研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methylene Blue for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized and Prospective Observational Studies.

Background: The impact of methylene blue (MB) on critical patient outcomes, including overall mortality, hemodynamic stability, and organ function has been inconsistently described across studies. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of MB therapy in adult patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: The systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases up to February 2024 included randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies involving adult septic shock patients who received intravenous MB therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes on hemodynamics and ICU length of stay.

Results: Fifteen studies (5 randomized, 10 non-randomized) involving a total of 441 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant reduction in mortality rates among septic shock patients treated with MB (mortality rate 0.52; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.66; P < .001). In a sub-analysis of only randomized trials, the results remained statistically significant (risk ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; P = .023). A significant increase in mean arterial pressure post-infusion was observed in three studies. Two studies showed no substantial difference in heart rate and two studies showed no difference in cardiac index following MB administration. Only one study showed a reduction in the length of ICU stay with MB use, while another observed a decrease in overall hospital length of stay.

Conclusions: The review and meta-analysis suggest that MB may be associated with a significant reduction in mortality in septic shock patients though findings are limited by sample size and heterogeneity. Further robust studies are needed to validate these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信