与医保患者非酒精性脂肪性肝炎疾病进展相关的成本:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yestle Kim, Joseph Medicis, Matthew Davis, Dominic Nunag, Robert Gish
{"title":"与医保患者非酒精性脂肪性肝炎疾病进展相关的成本:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yestle Kim, Joseph Medicis, Matthew Davis, Dominic Nunag, Robert Gish","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD), that may progress to advanced liver disease. Costs associated with progression are not well characterized. This study sought to quantify costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with NASH progression. <b>Methods:</b> Patients were included if diagnosed with NASH (ICD-10: K75.81) in 100% Medicare claims data (2015-2021) who were ≥66 years at index (diagnosis), continuously enrolled in Parts A, B and D for ≥12 months prior to and 6 months following index (unless death) and who had no evidence of other causes of liver disease. Patient-time was categorized into five severity states: non-cirrhotic NASH, compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplant (LT). Annualized HRU and costs were calculated during the study periods overall and stratified by occurrence and timing of progression. <b>Results:</b> In 14,806 unique patients (n = 12,990 non-cirrhotic NASH; 1899 CC; 997 DCC; 209 HCC; 140 LT), mean age and follow-up were 72.2 and 2.8 years, respectively. Average annualized costs increased from baseline following diagnosis, generally scaling with severity: $16,231 to $27,044; $25,122 to $57,705; $40,613 to $181,036; $36,549 to $165,121 and $35,626 to $108,918 in NASH; CC; DCC; HCC; and LT; respectively. Non-cirrhotic NASH and CC patients with progression had higher follow-up spending (1.6x for NASH; 1.7x for CC) than non-progressors (both p < 0.001), 2.8 and 6.1-times higher odds of an inpatient stay and 2.6 and 3.6-times higher odds to be in the top 20% of spenders, respectively, relative to non-progressors (both p < 0.001). Patients progressing within a year had costs 1.4, 1.6, 1.7 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for non-cirrhotic NASH and 1.3, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for CC. <b>Conclusion:</b> NASH progression is associated with high costs that increase in more severe disease states. Slower progression is associated with lower costs, suggesting a potential benefit of therapies that may delay or prevent progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis disease progression in Medicare patients: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yestle Kim, Joseph Medicis, Matthew Davis, Dominic Nunag, Robert Gish\",\"doi\":\"10.57264/cer-2024-0096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD), that may progress to advanced liver disease. Costs associated with progression are not well characterized. This study sought to quantify costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with NASH progression. <b>Methods:</b> Patients were included if diagnosed with NASH (ICD-10: K75.81) in 100% Medicare claims data (2015-2021) who were ≥66 years at index (diagnosis), continuously enrolled in Parts A, B and D for ≥12 months prior to and 6 months following index (unless death) and who had no evidence of other causes of liver disease. Patient-time was categorized into five severity states: non-cirrhotic NASH, compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplant (LT). Annualized HRU and costs were calculated during the study periods overall and stratified by occurrence and timing of progression. <b>Results:</b> In 14,806 unique patients (n = 12,990 non-cirrhotic NASH; 1899 CC; 997 DCC; 209 HCC; 140 LT), mean age and follow-up were 72.2 and 2.8 years, respectively. Average annualized costs increased from baseline following diagnosis, generally scaling with severity: $16,231 to $27,044; $25,122 to $57,705; $40,613 to $181,036; $36,549 to $165,121 and $35,626 to $108,918 in NASH; CC; DCC; HCC; and LT; respectively. Non-cirrhotic NASH and CC patients with progression had higher follow-up spending (1.6x for NASH; 1.7x for CC) than non-progressors (both p < 0.001), 2.8 and 6.1-times higher odds of an inpatient stay and 2.6 and 3.6-times higher odds to be in the top 20% of spenders, respectively, relative to non-progressors (both p < 0.001). Patients progressing within a year had costs 1.4, 1.6, 1.7 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for non-cirrhotic NASH and 1.3, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for CC. <b>Conclusion:</b> NASH progression is associated with high costs that increase in more severe disease states. Slower progression is associated with lower costs, suggesting a potential benefit of therapies that may delay or prevent progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e240096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)或代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎(MASH)是非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)或代谢功能障碍相关性肝病(MASLD)的一种严重形式,可能发展为晚期肝病。与病情进展相关的成本特征尚不十分明确。本研究旨在量化与 NASH 进展相关的成本和医疗资源利用率 (HRU)。研究方法纳入100%医疗保险报销数据(2015-2021年)中确诊为NASH(ICD-10:K75.81)的患者,这些患者在确诊时年龄≥66岁,在确诊前≥12个月和确诊后6个月内连续参加A、B和D部分(死亡除外),且无其他肝病病因证据。患者时间分为五种严重程度:非肝硬化性 NASH、代偿性肝硬化 (CC)、失代偿性肝硬化 (DCC)、肝细胞癌 (HCC) 和肝移植 (LT)。计算了研究期间的总体年化 HRU 和成本,并根据进展的发生和时间进行了分层。研究结果14806名患者(n = 12990名非肝硬化NASH患者;1899名CC患者;997名DCC患者;209名HCC患者;140名LT患者)的平均年龄和随访时间分别为72.2年和2.8年。NASH、CC、DCC、HCC 和 LT 的平均年化费用从基线开始增加,一般随严重程度的增加而增加:分别为 16,231 美元至 27,044 美元;25,122 美元至 57,705 美元;40,613 美元至 181,036 美元;36,549 美元至 165,121 美元和 35,626 美元至 108,918 美元。非肝硬化 NASH 和 CC 进展期患者的随访花费(NASH 为 1.6 倍;CC 为 1.7 倍)高于非进展期患者(均为 p 结论:NASH 和 CC 进展期患者的随访花费高于非进展期患者:NASH 进展与高昂的费用有关,疾病状态越严重,费用越高。病情进展较慢则费用较低,这表明延缓或预防病情进展的疗法可能会带来潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Costs associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis disease progression in Medicare patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Aim: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD), that may progress to advanced liver disease. Costs associated with progression are not well characterized. This study sought to quantify costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with NASH progression. Methods: Patients were included if diagnosed with NASH (ICD-10: K75.81) in 100% Medicare claims data (2015-2021) who were ≥66 years at index (diagnosis), continuously enrolled in Parts A, B and D for ≥12 months prior to and 6 months following index (unless death) and who had no evidence of other causes of liver disease. Patient-time was categorized into five severity states: non-cirrhotic NASH, compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplant (LT). Annualized HRU and costs were calculated during the study periods overall and stratified by occurrence and timing of progression. Results: In 14,806 unique patients (n = 12,990 non-cirrhotic NASH; 1899 CC; 997 DCC; 209 HCC; 140 LT), mean age and follow-up were 72.2 and 2.8 years, respectively. Average annualized costs increased from baseline following diagnosis, generally scaling with severity: $16,231 to $27,044; $25,122 to $57,705; $40,613 to $181,036; $36,549 to $165,121 and $35,626 to $108,918 in NASH; CC; DCC; HCC; and LT; respectively. Non-cirrhotic NASH and CC patients with progression had higher follow-up spending (1.6x for NASH; 1.7x for CC) than non-progressors (both p < 0.001), 2.8 and 6.1-times higher odds of an inpatient stay and 2.6 and 3.6-times higher odds to be in the top 20% of spenders, respectively, relative to non-progressors (both p < 0.001). Patients progressing within a year had costs 1.4, 1.6, 1.7 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for non-cirrhotic NASH and 1.3, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2-times more than year 2, 3, 4 and 5 progressors' costs, respectively, for CC. Conclusion: NASH progression is associated with high costs that increase in more severe disease states. Slower progression is associated with lower costs, suggesting a potential benefit of therapies that may delay or prevent progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信