{"title":"富血小板血浆治疗延迟愈合和未愈合骨折:总括荟萃分析。","authors":"Jinqiang Zhu, Dunhu Han, Yuanyuan Sun, Chunzeng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long bone fractures may exhibit nonunion/delayed union and the precise mechanism underlying this devastating condition remain unknown. More recently, a series of meta-analyses have examined the effect of local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients suffering from nonunion/delayed union fractures; however, the conclusions of available meta-analyses have remained debatable. This umbrella meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and recalculate available evidence to assess the certainty of the effect of PRP on nonunion/delayed union fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant meta-analyses and individual studies investigating the effect of PRP therapy on nonunion/delayed union fractures were obtained through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus up to November 2023. Meta-analyses were re-conducted for healing rate and healing time using a random effects model. The methodology quality of the included meta-analyses and the quality of evidence was assessed using the AMSTAR2 and GRADE criteria, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 meta-analyses with 13 individual studies, comprising 1362 patients, were included. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in both healing rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.60) and healing time (mean difference (MD): -1.25, 95 % CI: -2.09 to -0.42) of nonunion/delayed union fractures. However, when individual studies were pooled, PRP was not effective in increasing the healing rate, while it was effective in reducing healing time (MD = -2.15, 95 % CI = -3.17 to -1.13). PRP therapy had no significant effect on pain improvement and the Excellent/Good Posttreatment Limb Function. The risk of the adverse side effects was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella meta-analysis revealed that PRP may reduce healing time in patients with nonunion/delayed union fractures, with no potential side effects. This finding is needed to be confirmed by further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jinqiang Zhu, Dunhu Han, Yuanyuan Sun, Chunzeng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long bone fractures may exhibit nonunion/delayed union and the precise mechanism underlying this devastating condition remain unknown. More recently, a series of meta-analyses have examined the effect of local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients suffering from nonunion/delayed union fractures; however, the conclusions of available meta-analyses have remained debatable. This umbrella meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and recalculate available evidence to assess the certainty of the effect of PRP on nonunion/delayed union fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant meta-analyses and individual studies investigating the effect of PRP therapy on nonunion/delayed union fractures were obtained through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus up to November 2023. Meta-analyses were re-conducted for healing rate and healing time using a random effects model. The methodology quality of the included meta-analyses and the quality of evidence was assessed using the AMSTAR2 and GRADE criteria, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 meta-analyses with 13 individual studies, comprising 1362 patients, were included. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in both healing rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.60) and healing time (mean difference (MD): -1.25, 95 % CI: -2.09 to -0.42) of nonunion/delayed union fractures. However, when individual studies were pooled, PRP was not effective in increasing the healing rate, while it was effective in reducing healing time (MD = -2.15, 95 % CI = -3.17 to -1.13). PRP therapy had no significant effect on pain improvement and the Excellent/Good Posttreatment Limb Function. The risk of the adverse side effects was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella meta-analysis revealed that PRP may reduce healing time in patients with nonunion/delayed union fractures, with no potential side effects. This finding is needed to be confirmed by further studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis.
Background: Long bone fractures may exhibit nonunion/delayed union and the precise mechanism underlying this devastating condition remain unknown. More recently, a series of meta-analyses have examined the effect of local administration of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients suffering from nonunion/delayed union fractures; however, the conclusions of available meta-analyses have remained debatable. This umbrella meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and recalculate available evidence to assess the certainty of the effect of PRP on nonunion/delayed union fractures.
Methods: Relevant meta-analyses and individual studies investigating the effect of PRP therapy on nonunion/delayed union fractures were obtained through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus up to November 2023. Meta-analyses were re-conducted for healing rate and healing time using a random effects model. The methodology quality of the included meta-analyses and the quality of evidence was assessed using the AMSTAR2 and GRADE criteria, respectively.
Results: A total of 5 meta-analyses with 13 individual studies, comprising 1362 patients, were included. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in both healing rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.60) and healing time (mean difference (MD): -1.25, 95 % CI: -2.09 to -0.42) of nonunion/delayed union fractures. However, when individual studies were pooled, PRP was not effective in increasing the healing rate, while it was effective in reducing healing time (MD = -2.15, 95 % CI = -3.17 to -1.13). PRP therapy had no significant effect on pain improvement and the Excellent/Good Posttreatment Limb Function. The risk of the adverse side effects was not significant.
Conclusion: This umbrella meta-analysis revealed that PRP may reduce healing time in patients with nonunion/delayed union fractures, with no potential side effects. This finding is needed to be confirmed by further studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.