在线医疗机构审查中的种族和城市差异。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Neil K R Sehgal, Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur P Pelullo, Lyle Ungar, Raina M Merchant, Sharath Chandra Guntuku
{"title":"在线医疗机构审查中的种族和城市差异。","authors":"Neil K R Sehgal, Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur P Pelullo, Lyle Ungar, Raina M Merchant, Sharath Chandra Guntuku","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Online review platforms offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of health care services, capturing content and trends that traditional metrics might miss. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health care services, influencing patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine health care facility numerical ratings and patient experience reported on an online platform by facility type and area demographic characteristics after the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, post-COVID).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>All reviews of US health care facilities posted on one online platform from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023, were obtained for this cross-sectional study. Analyses focused on facilities providing essential health benefits, which are service categories that health insurance plans must cover under the Affordable Care Act. Facility zip code tabulation area level demographic data were obtained from US census and rural-urban commuting area codes.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the percentage of positive reviews (defined as reviews with ≥4 of 5 stars) before and post-COVID. Secondary outcomes included the association between positive ratings and facility demographic characteristics (race and ethnicity and urbanicity), and thematic analysis of review content using latent Dirichlet allocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 445 706 reviews across 151 307 facilities were included. The percent of positive reviews decreased from 54.3% to 47.9% (P < .001) after March 2020. Rural areas, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents, and areas with a higher proportion of White residents experienced lower positive ratings post-COVID, while reviews in areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents were less negatively impacted (P < .001 for all comparisons). For example, logistic regression showed that rural areas had significantly lower odds of positive reviews post-COVID compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Latent Dirichlet allocation identified themes such as billing issues, poor customer service, and insurance handling that increased post-COVID among certain communities. For instance, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents and areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents reported increases in insurance and billing issues, while areas with a higher proportion of White residents reported increases in wait time among negative reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This serial cross-sectional study observed a significant decrease in positive reviews for health care facilities post-COVID. These findings underscore a disparity in patient experience, particularly in rural areas and areas with the highest proportions of Black and White residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2446890"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities by Race and Urbanicity in Online Health Care Facility Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Neil K R Sehgal, Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur P Pelullo, Lyle Ungar, Raina M Merchant, Sharath Chandra Guntuku\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Online review platforms offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of health care services, capturing content and trends that traditional metrics might miss. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health care services, influencing patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine health care facility numerical ratings and patient experience reported on an online platform by facility type and area demographic characteristics after the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, post-COVID).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>All reviews of US health care facilities posted on one online platform from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023, were obtained for this cross-sectional study. Analyses focused on facilities providing essential health benefits, which are service categories that health insurance plans must cover under the Affordable Care Act. Facility zip code tabulation area level demographic data were obtained from US census and rural-urban commuting area codes.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in the percentage of positive reviews (defined as reviews with ≥4 of 5 stars) before and post-COVID. Secondary outcomes included the association between positive ratings and facility demographic characteristics (race and ethnicity and urbanicity), and thematic analysis of review content using latent Dirichlet allocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 445 706 reviews across 151 307 facilities were included. The percent of positive reviews decreased from 54.3% to 47.9% (P < .001) after March 2020. Rural areas, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents, and areas with a higher proportion of White residents experienced lower positive ratings post-COVID, while reviews in areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents were less negatively impacted (P < .001 for all comparisons). For example, logistic regression showed that rural areas had significantly lower odds of positive reviews post-COVID compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Latent Dirichlet allocation identified themes such as billing issues, poor customer service, and insurance handling that increased post-COVID among certain communities. For instance, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents and areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents reported increases in insurance and billing issues, while areas with a higher proportion of White residents reported increases in wait time among negative reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This serial cross-sectional study observed a significant decrease in positive reviews for health care facilities post-COVID. These findings underscore a disparity in patient experience, particularly in rural areas and areas with the highest proportions of Black and White residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"e2446890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584935/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:在线评论平台为了解患者满意度和医疗服务质量提供了宝贵的信息,可捕捉传统指标可能忽略的内容和趋势。COVID-19 大流行扰乱了医疗服务,影响了患者体验:目的:根据 COVID-19 大流行(即 COVID 后)后的医疗机构类型和地区人口特征,研究在线平台上报告的医疗机构数字评分和患者体验:这项横断面研究获得了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间在一个在线平台上发布的所有美国医疗机构的评论。分析的重点是提供基本医疗福利的医疗机构,即《平价医疗法案》规定医疗保险计划必须涵盖的服务类别。从美国人口普查和城乡通勤区代码中获得了医疗机构邮政编码制表区级人口数据:主要结果是 COVID 前后正面评价(定义为 5 星中≥4 星的评价)百分比的变化。次要结果包括正面评价与设施人口统计特征(种族、民族和城市化)之间的关联,以及使用潜在 Dirichlet 分配对评论内容进行的主题分析:共收录了 151 307 家机构的 1 445 706 篇评论。正面评论的百分比从 54.3% 降至 47.9%(P 结论和相关性:这项连续横断面研究观察到,COVID 后医疗机构的正面评价显著减少。这些发现强调了患者体验方面的差异,尤其是在农村地区以及黑人和白人居民比例最高的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities by Race and Urbanicity in Online Health Care Facility Reviews.

Importance: Online review platforms offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of health care services, capturing content and trends that traditional metrics might miss. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health care services, influencing patient experiences.

Objective: To examine health care facility numerical ratings and patient experience reported on an online platform by facility type and area demographic characteristics after the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, post-COVID).

Design, setting, and participants: All reviews of US health care facilities posted on one online platform from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023, were obtained for this cross-sectional study. Analyses focused on facilities providing essential health benefits, which are service categories that health insurance plans must cover under the Affordable Care Act. Facility zip code tabulation area level demographic data were obtained from US census and rural-urban commuting area codes.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the change in the percentage of positive reviews (defined as reviews with ≥4 of 5 stars) before and post-COVID. Secondary outcomes included the association between positive ratings and facility demographic characteristics (race and ethnicity and urbanicity), and thematic analysis of review content using latent Dirichlet allocation.

Results: A total of 1 445 706 reviews across 151 307 facilities were included. The percent of positive reviews decreased from 54.3% to 47.9% (P < .001) after March 2020. Rural areas, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents, and areas with a higher proportion of White residents experienced lower positive ratings post-COVID, while reviews in areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents were less negatively impacted (P < .001 for all comparisons). For example, logistic regression showed that rural areas had significantly lower odds of positive reviews post-COVID compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Latent Dirichlet allocation identified themes such as billing issues, poor customer service, and insurance handling that increased post-COVID among certain communities. For instance, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents and areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents reported increases in insurance and billing issues, while areas with a higher proportion of White residents reported increases in wait time among negative reviews.

Conclusions and relevance: This serial cross-sectional study observed a significant decrease in positive reviews for health care facilities post-COVID. These findings underscore a disparity in patient experience, particularly in rural areas and areas with the highest proportions of Black and White residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信