Mario Matute-González, Anna Darnell, Marc Comas-Cufí, Javier Pazó, Alexandre Soler, Belén Saborido, Ezequiel Mauro, Juan Turnes, Alejandro Forner, María Reig, Jordi Rimola
{"title":"利用特定领域的大型语言模型对自由文本 MRI 报告进行 LI-RADS v2018 分类:一项可行性研究。","authors":"Mario Matute-González, Anna Darnell, Marc Comas-Cufí, Javier Pazó, Alexandre Soler, Belén Saborido, Ezequiel Mauro, Juan Turnes, Alejandro Forner, María Reig, Jordi Rimola","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01850-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution. The algorithm's performance was compared to two independent radiologists and one hepatologist in a human replacement scenario, and considering two combined strategies (double reading with arbitration and triage). Agreement on LI-RADS category and dichotomic malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M) were estimated using linear-weighted κ statistics and Cohen's κ, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were calculated. The consensus agreement of three other radiologists served as the ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model showed moderate agreement against the ground truth for both LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.65]) and the dichotomized approach (κ = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42-0.73]). Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00), respectively. When the chatbot was used as a triage tool, performance improved for LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.86/0.87 for the two independent radiologists and κ = 0.76 for the hepatologist), dichotomized malignancy (κ = 0.94/0.91 and κ = 0.87) and LR-5 identification (1.00/0.98 and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.96/0.92 and 0.92 specificity), with no statistical significance compared to the human readers' individual performance. Through this strategy, the workload decreased by 45%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LI-RADS v2018 categorization from unlabelled MRI reports is feasible using our LLM, and it enhances the efficiency of data curation.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Our proof-of-concept study provides novel insights into the potential applications of LLMs, offering a real-world example of how these tools could be integrated into a local workflow to optimize data curation for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Automatic LI-RADS categorization from free-text reports would be beneficial to workflow and data mining. LiverAI, a GPT-4-based model, supported various strategies improving data curation efficiency by up to 60%. LLMs can integrate into workflows, significantly reducing radiologists' workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Matute-González, Anna Darnell, Marc Comas-Cufí, Javier Pazó, Alexandre Soler, Belén Saborido, Ezequiel Mauro, Juan Turnes, Alejandro Forner, María Reig, Jordi Rimola\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-024-01850-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution. The algorithm's performance was compared to two independent radiologists and one hepatologist in a human replacement scenario, and considering two combined strategies (double reading with arbitration and triage). Agreement on LI-RADS category and dichotomic malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M) were estimated using linear-weighted κ statistics and Cohen's κ, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were calculated. The consensus agreement of three other radiologists served as the ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model showed moderate agreement against the ground truth for both LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.65]) and the dichotomized approach (κ = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42-0.73]). Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00), respectively. When the chatbot was used as a triage tool, performance improved for LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.86/0.87 for the two independent radiologists and κ = 0.76 for the hepatologist), dichotomized malignancy (κ = 0.94/0.91 and κ = 0.87) and LR-5 identification (1.00/0.98 and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.96/0.92 and 0.92 specificity), with no statistical significance compared to the human readers' individual performance. Through this strategy, the workload decreased by 45%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LI-RADS v2018 categorization from unlabelled MRI reports is feasible using our LLM, and it enhances the efficiency of data curation.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Our proof-of-concept study provides novel insights into the potential applications of LLMs, offering a real-world example of how these tools could be integrated into a local workflow to optimize data curation for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Automatic LI-RADS categorization from free-text reports would be beneficial to workflow and data mining. LiverAI, a GPT-4-based model, supported various strategies improving data curation efficiency by up to 60%. LLMs can integrate into workflows, significantly reducing radiologists' workload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01850-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01850-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study.
Objective: To develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports.
Material and methods: This retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution. The algorithm's performance was compared to two independent radiologists and one hepatologist in a human replacement scenario, and considering two combined strategies (double reading with arbitration and triage). Agreement on LI-RADS category and dichotomic malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M) were estimated using linear-weighted κ statistics and Cohen's κ, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were calculated. The consensus agreement of three other radiologists served as the ground truth.
Results: The model showed moderate agreement against the ground truth for both LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.65]) and the dichotomized approach (κ = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42-0.73]). Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00), respectively. When the chatbot was used as a triage tool, performance improved for LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.86/0.87 for the two independent radiologists and κ = 0.76 for the hepatologist), dichotomized malignancy (κ = 0.94/0.91 and κ = 0.87) and LR-5 identification (1.00/0.98 and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.96/0.92 and 0.92 specificity), with no statistical significance compared to the human readers' individual performance. Through this strategy, the workload decreased by 45%.
Conclusion: LI-RADS v2018 categorization from unlabelled MRI reports is feasible using our LLM, and it enhances the efficiency of data curation.
Critical relevance statement: Our proof-of-concept study provides novel insights into the potential applications of LLMs, offering a real-world example of how these tools could be integrated into a local workflow to optimize data curation for research purposes.
Key points: Automatic LI-RADS categorization from free-text reports would be beneficial to workflow and data mining. LiverAI, a GPT-4-based model, supported various strategies improving data curation efficiency by up to 60%. LLMs can integrate into workflows, significantly reducing radiologists' workload.
期刊介绍:
Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere!
I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe.
Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy.
A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field.
I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members.
The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.