使用计算机断层扫描评估 hounsfield 单位的骨质:应使用什么值将骨质划分为正常或骨质疏松?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss
{"title":"使用计算机断层扫描评估 hounsfield 单位的骨质:应使用什么值将骨质划分为正常或骨质疏松?","authors":"Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08565-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate threshold values for classifying bone as normal or osteoporotic based on Computed Tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) and to determine if clinically applicable values could be derived to aid spine surgeons evaluating bone quality using CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This literature review was completed using PubMed and Ovid (MedLine), using syntax specific to bone quality and CT. The included articles were original clinical studies assessing bone quality and utilized composite L1-L4 HU values compared against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) values. Extracted data study descriptors, CT measurement technique, and CT threshold values. CTs were measured from L1-L4 using either axial or sagittal images, and must classify their bone quality findings for any of the following 3 categories: normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review located 34 studies measuring bone density using CT with threshold values, of which, 10 were included in the final review. Number of patients ranged from 74 to 283 and cohort ages from 20s to 70.6 years. CT threshold values for assessing normal and osteoporotic bone quality ranged from 150 to 179 and 87 to 155, respectively. From combining values across studies, a HU value of ≥ 170 HU was associated with normal bone and ≤ 115 HU with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is variation in HU values used to differentiate normal from compromised bone quality, even after limiting studies. For patients with HU values between or near 170 or 115 HU, a DEXA scan may be warranted for further evaluation. With ongoing investigation in this area, threshold values for classifying bone quality using CT will be continually refined.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing bone quality in hounsfield units using computed tomography: what value should be used to classify bone as normal or osteoporotic?\",\"authors\":\"Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08565-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate threshold values for classifying bone as normal or osteoporotic based on Computed Tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) and to determine if clinically applicable values could be derived to aid spine surgeons evaluating bone quality using CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This literature review was completed using PubMed and Ovid (MedLine), using syntax specific to bone quality and CT. The included articles were original clinical studies assessing bone quality and utilized composite L1-L4 HU values compared against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) values. Extracted data study descriptors, CT measurement technique, and CT threshold values. CTs were measured from L1-L4 using either axial or sagittal images, and must classify their bone quality findings for any of the following 3 categories: normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review located 34 studies measuring bone density using CT with threshold values, of which, 10 were included in the final review. Number of patients ranged from 74 to 283 and cohort ages from 20s to 70.6 years. CT threshold values for assessing normal and osteoporotic bone quality ranged from 150 to 179 and 87 to 155, respectively. From combining values across studies, a HU value of ≥ 170 HU was associated with normal bone and ≤ 115 HU with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is variation in HU values used to differentiate normal from compromised bone quality, even after limiting studies. For patients with HU values between or near 170 or 115 HU, a DEXA scan may be warranted for further evaluation. With ongoing investigation in this area, threshold values for classifying bone quality using CT will be continually refined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08565-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08565-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查根据计算机断层扫描(CT)霍斯菲尔德单位(HU)将骨质划分为正常或骨质疏松的阈值,并确定是否可以得出临床适用的值,以帮助脊柱外科医生使用 CT 评估骨质:本文献综述使用 PubMed 和 Ovid (MedLine),以骨质量和 CT 为特定语法。所收录的文章均为评估骨质的原创临床研究,采用的是L1-L4 HU复合值与双能X射线吸收测量(DEXA)值的比较。提取的数据包括研究描述符、CT 测量技术和 CT 临界值。CT使用轴向或矢状图像测量L1-L4,必须将其骨质量结果分为以下3类:正常、骨质疏松或骨质疏松症:本综述共找到 34 项使用 CT 测量骨密度并设定阈值的研究,其中 10 项纳入最终综述。患者人数从 74 人到 283 人不等,组群年龄从 20 多岁到 70.6 岁不等。评估正常骨质和骨质疏松骨质的 CT 临界值分别为 150 至 179 和 87 至 155。综合各项研究的数值,HU值≥170 HU与骨骼正常有关,≤115 HU与骨质疏松症有关:结论:用于区分骨质正常与骨质疏松症的 HU 值存在差异,即使在限制研究之后也是如此。对于 HU 值介于或接近 170 或 115 HU 的患者,可能需要进行 DEXA 扫描以进一步评估。随着该领域研究的不断深入,使用 CT 进行骨质分类的阈值也将不断完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing bone quality in hounsfield units using computed tomography: what value should be used to classify bone as normal or osteoporotic?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate threshold values for classifying bone as normal or osteoporotic based on Computed Tomography (CT) Hounsfield Units (HU) and to determine if clinically applicable values could be derived to aid spine surgeons evaluating bone quality using CT.

Methods: This literature review was completed using PubMed and Ovid (MedLine), using syntax specific to bone quality and CT. The included articles were original clinical studies assessing bone quality and utilized composite L1-L4 HU values compared against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) values. Extracted data study descriptors, CT measurement technique, and CT threshold values. CTs were measured from L1-L4 using either axial or sagittal images, and must classify their bone quality findings for any of the following 3 categories: normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis.

Results: This review located 34 studies measuring bone density using CT with threshold values, of which, 10 were included in the final review. Number of patients ranged from 74 to 283 and cohort ages from 20s to 70.6 years. CT threshold values for assessing normal and osteoporotic bone quality ranged from 150 to 179 and 87 to 155, respectively. From combining values across studies, a HU value of ≥ 170 HU was associated with normal bone and ≤ 115 HU with osteoporosis.

Conclusion: There is variation in HU values used to differentiate normal from compromised bone quality, even after limiting studies. For patients with HU values between or near 170 or 115 HU, a DEXA scan may be warranted for further evaluation. With ongoing investigation in this area, threshold values for classifying bone quality using CT will be continually refined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信