整个儿科药品生命周期中的证据生成:欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 与 EUnetHTA 在使用外推法方面的合作成果。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dominik Karres, María José Pino-Barrio, Sylvie Benchetrit, Norbert Benda, Pierre Cochat, Sara Galluzzo, Alejandro García-Solís, Sara Gonzalez, Roberto de Lisa, David Khan, Rita Lankester, Frederike Lentz, Pilar Angustias Martínez-Ortega, Simona Montilla, Daniel R Morales, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Sonia Pulido Sánchez, Ana Rossignoli Montero, Sabine Scherer, Andrew Thomson, Belén Torres Garrido, Denise Umuhire, Siri Wang, Ralph Bax, Niklas Hedberg
{"title":"整个儿科药品生命周期中的证据生成:欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 与 EUnetHTA 在使用外推法方面的合作成果。","authors":"Dominik Karres, María José Pino-Barrio, Sylvie Benchetrit, Norbert Benda, Pierre Cochat, Sara Galluzzo, Alejandro García-Solís, Sara Gonzalez, Roberto de Lisa, David Khan, Rita Lankester, Frederike Lentz, Pilar Angustias Martínez-Ortega, Simona Montilla, Daniel R Morales, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Sonia Pulido Sánchez, Ana Rossignoli Montero, Sabine Scherer, Andrew Thomson, Belén Torres Garrido, Denise Umuhire, Siri Wang, Ralph Bax, Niklas Hedberg","doi":"10.1111/bph.17396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug development for children presents unique challenges and is highly regulated. Novel approaches, such as the use of extrapolation to address, for example, the need to avoid unethical studies, whilst supporting robust evidence generation have been developed in support of benefit/risk considerations by regulatory authorities. This is only one step in the decision-making process towards access, which in Europe also includes health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Discussions related to evidentiary requirements in small populations using scientific evidence transfer have been identified as a priority action by European Medicines Agency/European Network for Health Technology Assessment 21 (EMA/EUnetHTA 21). We describe the outcome of this work and reflect on the discussions that had taken place on how to leverage prior knowledge through identifying and addressing uncertainties during life cycle management to support regulatory and HTA decision-making. Using examples, we explore the range of applications for evidence generation and offer regulatory and HTA insights on key design considerations for producing better evidence, reflecting our shared ambition. Early interactions with all respective stakeholders, particularly between regulators and HTA bodies are key to optimise data generation and utility in children. In Europe, the HTA regulation will offer opportunities for collaborations, which are important for all development efforts. We collaboratively explored the unique specific challenges relating to paediatric drug development, ethically and in its ability to leverage prior knowledge, as exemplified using extrapolation. Learnings from these offer opportunities to further develop methodology on how to leverage uncertainties across a product's life cycle for small populations generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":9262,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence generation throughout paediatric medicines life cycle: findings from collaborative work between European Medicines Agency (EMA) and EUnetHTA on use of extrapolation.\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Karres, María José Pino-Barrio, Sylvie Benchetrit, Norbert Benda, Pierre Cochat, Sara Galluzzo, Alejandro García-Solís, Sara Gonzalez, Roberto de Lisa, David Khan, Rita Lankester, Frederike Lentz, Pilar Angustias Martínez-Ortega, Simona Montilla, Daniel R Morales, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Sonia Pulido Sánchez, Ana Rossignoli Montero, Sabine Scherer, Andrew Thomson, Belén Torres Garrido, Denise Umuhire, Siri Wang, Ralph Bax, Niklas Hedberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bph.17396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug development for children presents unique challenges and is highly regulated. Novel approaches, such as the use of extrapolation to address, for example, the need to avoid unethical studies, whilst supporting robust evidence generation have been developed in support of benefit/risk considerations by regulatory authorities. This is only one step in the decision-making process towards access, which in Europe also includes health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Discussions related to evidentiary requirements in small populations using scientific evidence transfer have been identified as a priority action by European Medicines Agency/European Network for Health Technology Assessment 21 (EMA/EUnetHTA 21). We describe the outcome of this work and reflect on the discussions that had taken place on how to leverage prior knowledge through identifying and addressing uncertainties during life cycle management to support regulatory and HTA decision-making. Using examples, we explore the range of applications for evidence generation and offer regulatory and HTA insights on key design considerations for producing better evidence, reflecting our shared ambition. Early interactions with all respective stakeholders, particularly between regulators and HTA bodies are key to optimise data generation and utility in children. In Europe, the HTA regulation will offer opportunities for collaborations, which are important for all development efforts. We collaboratively explored the unique specific challenges relating to paediatric drug development, ethically and in its ability to leverage prior knowledge, as exemplified using extrapolation. Learnings from these offer opportunities to further develop methodology on how to leverage uncertainties across a product's life cycle for small populations generally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.17396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.17396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童药物研发面临着独特的挑战,并且受到严格监管。监管机构已开发出一些新方法,例如使用外推法来解决避免不道德研究的需要,同时支持有力的证据生成,以支持效益/风险考虑。在欧洲,决策过程还包括卫生技术评估(HTA)机构。欧洲药品管理局/欧洲 21 世纪健康技术评估网络(EMA/EUnetHTA 21)已将有关使用科学证据转移的小群体证据要求的讨论确定为优先行动。我们介绍了这项工作的成果,并反思了关于如何通过识别和解决生命周期管理中的不确定性来利用已有知识以支持监管和 HTA 决策的讨论。通过实例,我们探讨了证据生成的应用范围,并就生成更好证据的关键设计考虑因素为监管和 HTA 提供了见解,反映了我们的共同愿望。与所有利益相关者,特别是监管机构和 HTA 机构之间的早期互动,是优化儿童数据生成和效用的关键。在欧洲,HTA 法规将提供合作机会,这对所有开发工作都很重要。我们共同探讨了与儿科药物开发有关的独特的具体挑战,包括伦理方面的挑战和利用已有知识的能力方面的挑战,外推法就是一个很好的例子。从中学到的知识为进一步开发方法提供了机会,这些方法涉及如何利用产品生命周期中的不确定性来解决小群体的普遍问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence generation throughout paediatric medicines life cycle: findings from collaborative work between European Medicines Agency (EMA) and EUnetHTA on use of extrapolation.

Drug development for children presents unique challenges and is highly regulated. Novel approaches, such as the use of extrapolation to address, for example, the need to avoid unethical studies, whilst supporting robust evidence generation have been developed in support of benefit/risk considerations by regulatory authorities. This is only one step in the decision-making process towards access, which in Europe also includes health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Discussions related to evidentiary requirements in small populations using scientific evidence transfer have been identified as a priority action by European Medicines Agency/European Network for Health Technology Assessment 21 (EMA/EUnetHTA 21). We describe the outcome of this work and reflect on the discussions that had taken place on how to leverage prior knowledge through identifying and addressing uncertainties during life cycle management to support regulatory and HTA decision-making. Using examples, we explore the range of applications for evidence generation and offer regulatory and HTA insights on key design considerations for producing better evidence, reflecting our shared ambition. Early interactions with all respective stakeholders, particularly between regulators and HTA bodies are key to optimise data generation and utility in children. In Europe, the HTA regulation will offer opportunities for collaborations, which are important for all development efforts. We collaboratively explored the unique specific challenges relating to paediatric drug development, ethically and in its ability to leverage prior knowledge, as exemplified using extrapolation. Learnings from these offer opportunities to further develop methodology on how to leverage uncertainties across a product's life cycle for small populations generally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
12.30%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is a biomedical science journal offering comprehensive international coverage of experimental and translational pharmacology. It publishes original research, authoritative reviews, mini reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, databases, letters to the Editor, and commentaries. Review articles, databases, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are typically commissioned, but unsolicited contributions are also considered, either as standalone papers or part of themed issues. In addition to basic science research, BJP features translational pharmacology research, including proof-of-concept and early mechanistic studies in humans. While it generally does not publish first-in-man phase I studies or phase IIb, III, or IV studies, exceptions may be made under certain circumstances, particularly if results are combined with preclinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信