数据为谁服务?坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉地区两家医院对围产期电子登记的体验和看法。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jil Molenaar, Amani Kikula, Yusufu Kionga, Hassan Tearish Berenge, Lenka Benova, Josefien van Olmen, Claudia Hanson, Muzdalifat Abeid, Andrea Barnabas Pembe
{"title":"数据为谁服务?坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉地区两家医院对围产期电子登记的体验和看法。","authors":"Jil Molenaar, Amani Kikula, Yusufu Kionga, Hassan Tearish Berenge, Lenka Benova, Josefien van Olmen, Claudia Hanson, Muzdalifat Abeid, Andrea Barnabas Pembe","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital data systems have the potential to improve data quality and provide individual-level information to understand gaps in the quality of care. This study explored experiences and perceptions of a perinatal eRegistry in two hospitals in Mtwara region, Tanzania. Drawing from realist evaluation and systems thinking, we go beyond a descriptive account of stakeholders' experiences and provide insight into key structural drivers and underlying social paradigms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out 6 weeks of focused ethnographic observations at the labour wards of the two hospitals and 29 semi-structured qualitative interviews with labour ward staff, as well as with administrative and managerial stakeholders at hospital, district and regional levels. Multi-stage reflexive thematic data analysis was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide an in-depth account of the day-to-day functioning of the eRegistry in the two hospitals, including both aspects of positive change and key challenges with its integration into routine documentation duties. Experiences with and perceptions of the eRegistry were inextricably linked to broader systemic constraints relating to staffing, workload and infrastructure. A key underlying theme shaping the way people engaged with the eRegistry was the notion of data ownership: the presence or absence of a feeling of being responsible, involved and in control of data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some of the key systemic challenges in recording accurate, timely information about women and their babies are not solved by digital tools. Our findings also underline that when healthcare workers feel that data are not primarily for them, they document only for reporting purposes. The eRegistry increased a sense of data ownership among the nurse-midwives directly involved with data entry, but the potential for promoting and supporting data use feedback loops for improvement in care provision remained largely untapped. Our findings highlight the importance of local relevance and ownership in digitisation of routine health information systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Data for whom?</i> Experiences and perceptions of a perinatal eRegistry in two hospitals in Mtwara region, Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Jil Molenaar, Amani Kikula, Yusufu Kionga, Hassan Tearish Berenge, Lenka Benova, Josefien van Olmen, Claudia Hanson, Muzdalifat Abeid, Andrea Barnabas Pembe\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital data systems have the potential to improve data quality and provide individual-level information to understand gaps in the quality of care. This study explored experiences and perceptions of a perinatal eRegistry in two hospitals in Mtwara region, Tanzania. Drawing from realist evaluation and systems thinking, we go beyond a descriptive account of stakeholders' experiences and provide insight into key structural drivers and underlying social paradigms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out 6 weeks of focused ethnographic observations at the labour wards of the two hospitals and 29 semi-structured qualitative interviews with labour ward staff, as well as with administrative and managerial stakeholders at hospital, district and regional levels. Multi-stage reflexive thematic data analysis was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide an in-depth account of the day-to-day functioning of the eRegistry in the two hospitals, including both aspects of positive change and key challenges with its integration into routine documentation duties. Experiences with and perceptions of the eRegistry were inextricably linked to broader systemic constraints relating to staffing, workload and infrastructure. A key underlying theme shaping the way people engaged with the eRegistry was the notion of data ownership: the presence or absence of a feeling of being responsible, involved and in control of data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some of the key systemic challenges in recording accurate, timely information about women and their babies are not solved by digital tools. Our findings also underline that when healthcare workers feel that data are not primarily for them, they document only for reporting purposes. The eRegistry increased a sense of data ownership among the nurse-midwives directly involved with data entry, but the potential for promoting and supporting data use feedback loops for improvement in care provision remained largely untapped. Our findings highlight the importance of local relevance and ownership in digitisation of routine health information systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:数字数据系统有可能提高数据质量,并提供个人层面的信息,以了解护理质量方面的差距。本研究探讨了坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉地区两家医院对围产期电子登记系统的体验和看法。借鉴现实主义评估和系统思维,我们不仅描述了利益相关者的经验,还深入探讨了关键的结构性驱动因素和潜在的社会范式:我们对两家医院的产房进行了为期 6 周的重点人种学观察,并对产房工作人员以及医院、地区和区域层面的行政和管理利益相关者进行了 29 次半结构化定性访谈。我们进行了多阶段反思性专题数据分析:结果:我们深入介绍了电子登记册在两家医院的日常运作情况,包括积极变化的方面以及在将其纳入日常文件职责时所面临的主要挑战。对电子登记册的体验和看法与人员配置、工作量和基础设施等更广泛的系统限制密不可分。影响人们参与电子登记册方式的一个关键基本主题是数据所有权的概念:有无对数据负责、参与和控制的感觉:结论:在准确、及时地记录妇女及其婴儿的信息方面,一些关键的系统性挑战并不能通过数字工具来解决。我们的研究结果还强调,当医护人员认为数据主要不是为他们服务时,他们记录数据只是为了报告。电子登记册增强了直接参与数据录入的助产士对数据的主人翁意识,但促进和支持数据使用反馈循环以改善护理服务的潜力在很大程度上仍未得到开发。我们的研究结果凸显了地方相关性和所有权在常规医疗信息系统数字化中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data for whom? Experiences and perceptions of a perinatal eRegistry in two hospitals in Mtwara region, Tanzania.

Introduction: Digital data systems have the potential to improve data quality and provide individual-level information to understand gaps in the quality of care. This study explored experiences and perceptions of a perinatal eRegistry in two hospitals in Mtwara region, Tanzania. Drawing from realist evaluation and systems thinking, we go beyond a descriptive account of stakeholders' experiences and provide insight into key structural drivers and underlying social paradigms.

Methods: We carried out 6 weeks of focused ethnographic observations at the labour wards of the two hospitals and 29 semi-structured qualitative interviews with labour ward staff, as well as with administrative and managerial stakeholders at hospital, district and regional levels. Multi-stage reflexive thematic data analysis was carried out.

Results: We provide an in-depth account of the day-to-day functioning of the eRegistry in the two hospitals, including both aspects of positive change and key challenges with its integration into routine documentation duties. Experiences with and perceptions of the eRegistry were inextricably linked to broader systemic constraints relating to staffing, workload and infrastructure. A key underlying theme shaping the way people engaged with the eRegistry was the notion of data ownership: the presence or absence of a feeling of being responsible, involved and in control of data.

Conclusion: Some of the key systemic challenges in recording accurate, timely information about women and their babies are not solved by digital tools. Our findings also underline that when healthcare workers feel that data are not primarily for them, they document only for reporting purposes. The eRegistry increased a sense of data ownership among the nurse-midwives directly involved with data entry, but the potential for promoting and supporting data use feedback loops for improvement in care provision remained largely untapped. Our findings highlight the importance of local relevance and ownership in digitisation of routine health information systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信