药房参与对弥合医疗补助管理患者护理差距的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ellen Montgomery, Tiffany Sherod-Harris, Marina Adkins, Molly Hinely
{"title":"药房参与对弥合医疗补助管理患者护理差距的影响。","authors":"Ellen Montgomery, Tiffany Sherod-Harris, Marina Adkins, Molly Hinely","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A population health pharmacy team was developed to improve health and increase reimbursement for patients with value-based care plans. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacy involvement on care gap closure in Managed Medicaid patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of Managed Medicaid patients seen at outpatient facilities. Patients had a pharmacy risk score (PRS) of 6 or greater and had not achieved the Medicaid quality measures for both glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP). The intervention group included patients reviewed by pharmacy, compared to a control group of patients not reviewed by pharmacy. The primary outcome was closure of at least one care gap by the end of 2022. Secondary outcomes were the number of each type of gap closed, the frequency at which recommendations were made by pharmacists, and the frequency at which pharmacist recommendations were implemented by providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected for 80 patients for the period from January through October 2022. The primary outcome occurred in 37 (74%) patients in the intervention group and 15 (50%) patients in the control group (odds ratio, 2.85; P = 0.032). The HbA1c gap was closed in 30 (60%) patients in the intervention group and 8 (27%) patients in the control group. The BP gap was closed in 24 (48%) patients in the intervention group and 11 (37%) patients in the control group. The frequency with which recommendations were made by a pharmacist was associated with gap closure (P = 0.012). No significant difference was found based on the frequency at which recommendations were implemented by providers (P = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacy intervention was associated with an almost 3-fold-higher likelihood of closing at least one care gap in Medicaid patients. HbA1c gap closure was achieved more frequently than BP gap closure due to pharmacy involvement. The frequency with which recommendations were made by pharmacy was associated with increased gap closure regardless of the frequency with which these recommendations were implemented by providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pharmacy involvement on care gap closure in Managed Medicaid patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Montgomery, Tiffany Sherod-Harris, Marina Adkins, Molly Hinely\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A population health pharmacy team was developed to improve health and increase reimbursement for patients with value-based care plans. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacy involvement on care gap closure in Managed Medicaid patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of Managed Medicaid patients seen at outpatient facilities. Patients had a pharmacy risk score (PRS) of 6 or greater and had not achieved the Medicaid quality measures for both glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP). The intervention group included patients reviewed by pharmacy, compared to a control group of patients not reviewed by pharmacy. The primary outcome was closure of at least one care gap by the end of 2022. Secondary outcomes were the number of each type of gap closed, the frequency at which recommendations were made by pharmacists, and the frequency at which pharmacist recommendations were implemented by providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected for 80 patients for the period from January through October 2022. The primary outcome occurred in 37 (74%) patients in the intervention group and 15 (50%) patients in the control group (odds ratio, 2.85; P = 0.032). The HbA1c gap was closed in 30 (60%) patients in the intervention group and 8 (27%) patients in the control group. The BP gap was closed in 24 (48%) patients in the intervention group and 11 (37%) patients in the control group. The frequency with which recommendations were made by a pharmacist was associated with gap closure (P = 0.012). No significant difference was found based on the frequency at which recommendations were implemented by providers (P = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacy intervention was associated with an almost 3-fold-higher likelihood of closing at least one care gap in Medicaid patients. HbA1c gap closure was achieved more frequently than BP gap closure due to pharmacy involvement. The frequency with which recommendations were made by pharmacy was associated with increased gap closure regardless of the frequency with which these recommendations were implemented by providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立人口健康药学团队的目的是通过基于价值的护理计划改善患者的健康状况并提高报销额度。本研究旨在评估药房参与对弥合医疗补助管理计划患者护理差距的影响:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在门诊设施就诊的医疗补助管理计划患者。患者的药房风险评分(PRS)为 6 分或更高,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和血压(BP)均未达到医疗补助质量标准。干预组包括经药房审核的患者,对照组则包括未经药房审核的患者。主要结果是在 2022 年底前至少消除一个护理差距。次要结果是每种类型的差距缩小的数量、药剂师提出建议的频率以及医疗服务提供者实施药剂师建议的频率:收集了 80 名患者在 2022 年 1 月至 10 月期间的数据。干预组 37 名患者(74%)和对照组 15 名患者(50%)出现了主要结果(几率比为 2.85;P = 0.032)。干预组 30 名患者(60%)和对照组 8 名患者(27%)消除了 HbA1c 差距。干预组有 24 名患者(48%)消除了血压差距,对照组有 11 名患者(37%)消除了血压差距。药剂师提出建议的频率与差距缩小有关(P = 0.012)。根据医疗服务提供者实施建议的频率,没有发现明显差异(P = 0.4):结论:药剂师的干预与医疗补助患者缩小至少一个护理差距的可能性几乎相差 3 倍。由于药房的参与,HbA1c缺口缩小的频率高于血压缺口缩小的频率。无论医疗服务提供者实施这些建议的频率如何,药房提出建议的频率都与差距缩小率的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pharmacy involvement on care gap closure in Managed Medicaid patients.

Purpose: A population health pharmacy team was developed to improve health and increase reimbursement for patients with value-based care plans. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacy involvement on care gap closure in Managed Medicaid patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of Managed Medicaid patients seen at outpatient facilities. Patients had a pharmacy risk score (PRS) of 6 or greater and had not achieved the Medicaid quality measures for both glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP). The intervention group included patients reviewed by pharmacy, compared to a control group of patients not reviewed by pharmacy. The primary outcome was closure of at least one care gap by the end of 2022. Secondary outcomes were the number of each type of gap closed, the frequency at which recommendations were made by pharmacists, and the frequency at which pharmacist recommendations were implemented by providers.

Results: Data were collected for 80 patients for the period from January through October 2022. The primary outcome occurred in 37 (74%) patients in the intervention group and 15 (50%) patients in the control group (odds ratio, 2.85; P = 0.032). The HbA1c gap was closed in 30 (60%) patients in the intervention group and 8 (27%) patients in the control group. The BP gap was closed in 24 (48%) patients in the intervention group and 11 (37%) patients in the control group. The frequency with which recommendations were made by a pharmacist was associated with gap closure (P = 0.012). No significant difference was found based on the frequency at which recommendations were implemented by providers (P = 0.4).

Conclusion: Pharmacy intervention was associated with an almost 3-fold-higher likelihood of closing at least one care gap in Medicaid patients. HbA1c gap closure was achieved more frequently than BP gap closure due to pharmacy involvement. The frequency with which recommendations were made by pharmacy was associated with increased gap closure regardless of the frequency with which these recommendations were implemented by providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信